Player Discussion: Winnipeg Jets Defense
- Thread starter voyageur
- Start date
-
Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
That's exactly what I'd do. I don't think Arniel will hesitate to swap guys if they struggle to start.
scelaton
Registered User
- Jul 5, 2012
- 3,798
- 6,309
This alignment was my preference. Keep the first pair intact as we know it works well, and give them a bit more ice time, if necessary.
I've been impressed with Fleury. I think he can play a complimentary 2-way role with Pionk, keeping the size that we lost with Samberg.
I'm less sure of Miller anywhere but the third pairing, but he will give stability to that pairing in a sheltered role as Heinola adjusts again to the NHL.
- Jun 10, 2014
- 59,930
- 33,500
I can see swapping Miller and DeMelo to better support Ville at first. Not saying that is necessary but it might be an option. Not sure how badly Miller would do with JMo in the top pair. It might cost Morrissey's offence.
I think at this point they will treat Villie as any other player, as tonight's lineup suggests. You move the #3 guy up and insert the guy playing his 1st game in at #3. Miller is a capable 3rd pairing vet, that along with some sheltering should be enough for Villie. I don't think you want to mess with your top pairing unless you get desperate, and if that is the case not a good outcome for Villie.
- Mar 10, 2010
- 36,028
- 36,039
When I look at that D line up, I would say be have a top pair two bottom pairs. Teams deal with injuries though so lets see how it goes vs one of the hottest teams in the NHL.
- Dec 29, 2016
- 8,029
- 14,872
It will be interesting to see how the guys play in front of our D tonight -
If they don't provide top level support, we might be on for a long night.
I would think Arniel will ask the bottom 4 to play with defense as the priority - and let JoMo continue to do his thing (although I expect his minutes will be way up tonight).
We'll might also see big minutes for the Lowry line - and more minutes for the 4th line.
The top 6 up front might see less - especially if our D has trouble with outlets and dzone time.
Hoping we play a hard grinder tonight - I don't want to see a wide open game
If they don't provide top level support, we might be on for a long night.
I would think Arniel will ask the bottom 4 to play with defense as the priority - and let JoMo continue to do his thing (although I expect his minutes will be way up tonight).
We'll might also see big minutes for the Lowry line - and more minutes for the 4th line.
The top 6 up front might see less - especially if our D has trouble with outlets and dzone time.
Hoping we play a hard grinder tonight - I don't want to see a wide open game
voyageur
Grizzled vet
- Jul 10, 2011
- 11,581
- 12,240
So what do you think about Stanley coming back?
He's going to get into the lineup sooner rather than later.
Who comes out?
I think you go back with Stanley and Miller. Miller is quietly showing that he can handle some defensive responsibility this year. And I wonder if at some point he starts getting some playing time with Morrissey since De Melo hasn't been as steady this year. Melo and Stanley could be the 1st unit PK for the time Samberg is out.
I'd like to see Heinola with Pionk for a game or two, what that looks like. I feel like Pionk is a better player with a better skater on his side. Heinola can cover a lot of ice and I think with a puck moving line like the Ehlers line there's some offensive opportunities there. At some point maybe gets some PP2 time?
He's going to get into the lineup sooner rather than later.
Who comes out?
I think you go back with Stanley and Miller. Miller is quietly showing that he can handle some defensive responsibility this year. And I wonder if at some point he starts getting some playing time with Morrissey since De Melo hasn't been as steady this year. Melo and Stanley could be the 1st unit PK for the time Samberg is out.
I'd like to see Heinola with Pionk for a game or two, what that looks like. I feel like Pionk is a better player with a better skater on his side. Heinola can cover a lot of ice and I think with a puck moving line like the Ehlers line there's some offensive opportunities there. At some point maybe gets some PP2 time?
- Mar 10, 2010
- 36,028
- 36,039
BobTheSolarsystem
Registered User
- Oct 4, 2020
- 11,934
- 19,341
He has been diagnosed as not zdeno chara.
voyageur
Grizzled vet
- Jul 10, 2011
- 11,581
- 12,240
As of Wednesday he ditched the yellow non contact jersey for a regular one, so I expect with a practice he is good to go. IC's change of servers has given them some hiccups, so no more info.
Crocket
Registered User
- Jul 14, 2013
- 1,383
- 987
Heinola is a going to get a run of games, to see how he progresses and conditions. His IQ and puck moving ability are far better than Stanley's and Samberg's. If his speed gets back to normal he's a great add to our D.
Stanley is not only a liability at times he gets untimely penalties.
Samberg has had a good start. But he definitely has lapses and is best suited to a simple game with a puck moving partner. His size and shot blocking are great.
Pionk is a wild card. He's great when playing 100, a liability when he isn't. I'd trade him.
Stanley is not only a liability at times he gets untimely penalties.
Samberg has had a good start. But he definitely has lapses and is best suited to a simple game with a puck moving partner. His size and shot blocking are great.
Pionk is a wild card. He's great when playing 100, a liability when he isn't. I'd trade him.
BobTheSolarsystem
Registered User
- Oct 4, 2020
- 11,934
- 19,341
Holy tough crowd... all sambergs stats point towards a top pairing D what is the guy supposed to do
- Dec 29, 2016
- 8,029
- 14,872
If only those guys were as good as Ville, we'd have the best D on the planet.
A Ville clone would be perfect?
This sort of matches the "eye test" for me. Morrissey, Samberg and Miller have been anchoring the 3 D pairs. I think Pionk is getting downgraded in this model due to his poor prior performance, so I'd rank him higher.
The concern has to be about DeMelo, as noted...
The concern has to be about DeMelo, as noted...
It also aligns with what most are seeing - Stanley is hot garbage and worse than 3rd pair
- Jun 10, 2014
- 59,930
- 33,500
I don't think Stan is quite that bad. Fleury is less bad though. Too soon to reach any conclusion on Heinola. Pionk needs to keep up the offense to be a positive.
Crocket
Registered User
- Jul 14, 2013
- 1,383
- 987
Don't think anyone is saying that. The Samberg Pionk pair has been good. Except a couple games where they were caved in.
Heinola is gonna need lots of time if he's going to develop
BobTheSolarsystem
Registered User
- Oct 4, 2020
- 11,934
- 19,341
voyageur
Grizzled vet
- Jul 10, 2011
- 11,581
- 12,240
The model posted has Pionk as the 2nd worse d-man. He leads the defense in ES points. 2nd in +/-. 2nd in hits. 2nd in blocked shots. Plays heavy defensive zone minutes too. I say the model is wrong, and not even worth considering if that is the analysis.
BobTheSolarsystem
Registered User
- Oct 4, 2020
- 11,934
- 19,341
Again. This is the entire purpose of models... to find and define a larger dataset to give us a clearer picture than just gut instinct
I find his rating surprising but this makes me wonder if we are wearing rose coloured glasses - it doesnt make me throw the model away
I was looking at that, too. Pionk's rating just seems wrong. Especially offense.
BobTheSolarsystem
Registered User
- Oct 4, 2020
- 11,934
- 19,341
bustamente
Fraud Supporter
Samberg's worth is being shown right now, could be a great bargaining chip in the summer when he becomes a RFA
