Winners and losers of the 2024 NHL draft?

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/

Pantokrator

Who's the clown?
Jan 27, 2004
6,172
1,395
Semmes, Alabama
Philly prob are the biggest losers of the draft. giving up Buium for a 3rd
To be fair, if the Flyers drafted Buium, he would have either refused to play for the team, come down with some mystery ailment that would make him retire early, changed careers and become a head chef somewhere - undoubtedly it would not have worked out because this is the Flyers way.

We can all be happy they didn't draft him so the kid can go and have a great career. Instead, we took a future 3rd line center so we can stay mediocre to bad. The hockey gods will allow this.
 

Random schmoe

Random fan with their own opinions
Sponsor
Feb 13, 2019
1,054
1,190
Grading the Caps' draft will likely hinge on whether Terik Parascak ends up justifying the slot he was taken at. He's high reward, based on his "point accumulation" ability and reputation for work ethic and all situations play could end up one of the best players from the class, but he could also never solve some of the concerns that prospect analysts had for him going in.

IF Hutson ends up closer to his brother than a Christian Djoos type for example that could also move them into a 'winners' column.

Ask me again in 5 years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AlexBrovechkin8

Dr Jan Itor

Registered User
Dec 10, 2009
46,460
21,316
MinneSNOWta
This is what alarms me the most. If you're going to isolate a singular position of need, fine. But Hage and Helenius, IMO, are objectively better. Not only did you pass on them, but once the "rebuild" that isn't actually happening is complete, you'll be competing with the teams that got both Helenius and Hage.
Doesn't the "IMO" make them subjectively better?
 

SannywithoutCompy

Registered User
Dec 22, 2020
2,358
4,385
As a Blues fan I absolutely love how Carolina took on this draft. If we take out the Poirier pick, which I wasn't a fan of, I feel like they got tremendous value out of every other pick they made.
Funny, I think the Poirier pick was their best value pick.
 

57special

Posting the right way since 2012.
Sep 5, 2012
49,459
21,355
MN
Cam York never posed a problem. I just don’t see how one player ruins it for an organization.

Still, Helenius was the best centre at that point.
Luchanko came on in the eyes of scouts. He's faster than Helenius, but otherwise plays a similar game, and is almost the exact same size. Coaches love him, and praise his IQ. I don't see any difference between him and Helenius- I like both.

Luchanko was a decent pick, and if PHI doesn't need an offensive LHD then i understand the move. In real time, they had very little time to make a deal, and i can only assume that MN's was the best one, allowing them to move back only one spot, still be able to pick the player they wanted, and gain a 3rd out of it.

I really like Buium, but like most prospects in this draft besides Celebrini, he has his flaws. He needs to work on his defending, and skating(mostly for speed).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bye Bye Blueston

Misery74

Registered User
Nov 20, 2017
2,488
2,432
Pittsburgh the big loser. Take this with a grain of salt, as I am a Caps fan.

This organization is struggling with the “in between times”, and seem to be making things worse.

It’s time to blow it up Pittsburgh.
 

TGWL

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 28, 2011
15,712
10,443
Very jealous that players like Artamonov went at 50. That's fantastic value.

Rangers missed out some some players that dropped by not having a pick until 119, which they moved up to grab. (Seemed pointless by then). I said this was going to be a draft where players are going to drop to the 2nd/3rd round and teams having multiple picks would make out with a lot of potential. Oh, well. I don't hate their first pick in Emery but i'm not super hyped over it either.
 

Zegs2sendhelp

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 25, 2012
41,787
38,316
I am curious to know who Montreal was targeting when they moved up to 21.
Originally I thought it was to target stolberg,

or maybe a more enticing piece for a potential trade they were working on, if Demidov didn’t fall to them
 

kyne

Registered User
Oct 24, 2007
664
405
I am curious to know who Montreal was targeting when they moved up to 21.
It was Hage all along apparently. Hughes mentioned he had a trade in place for the pick if he didn't get him. Toronto thought the same way.
 

CanadienShark

Registered User
Dec 18, 2012
39,549
13,963
San Jose won by far.

Underrated pick: Winnipeg. For a team that didn't have much draft capital, I felt like they got good value.
Hard not to win with Celebrini. Dickinson falling was... Something else. I'm less familiar with prospects outside the 1st round, but we landed a 1st round calibre guy at #33. Super, super happy with this draft. Things are looking up, finally.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 67 others

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad