Cute but not there yet.
Bowler started the rebuild a while ago,after trading the veteran d-men Sobolev, Holmes and De'Angelis for 10 draft picks and Walton.A few thoughts...
- When you outshoot a team that badly, at least early on, I expect a win. Some props have to be given to the Hounds for pressing on the gas when the chance was there and shutting the door, otherwise.
- I think the biggest issues started with the Cloutier goal (3rd goal). When it's 2-1 and you're out playing them, having a goal scored like that (off the skates) is tough. Costanzo was angry at it.
- Then, having a buzzer-beater just added to the frustration.
- I feel for Costanzo in this. You see 5GA on 19 shots and think "he must have played horribly." He wasn't the issue by any stretch. Defensive lapses, a really solid PP from the Hounds, and just overall Grade A chances.
- The scrum in the third... it wasn't as bad as Saturday night, thankfully. Neither team was innocent and, fortunately, no suspensions will come from it. I liked how the Spits stood up for each other, though.
I don't know what the answers are. This wasn't necessarily a lack of D because they held them to 19 shots. You do that and you're going to win nine times out of 10. The Hounds just had some huge Grade A chances and did an impressive job in capitalizing. Combine that with the Spits lack of ability to solve Schenkel and... this is the result.
Windsor has to find a way. I'm perplexed. They have issues; everyone can see it and they know things need to change. How to do that beyond practice? I don't know. Maybe Bowler starts the rebuild earlier than expected? Does he bring in a veteran D to help? So many questions, so few answers.
AgreedIt is a D problem. I was there today. Giving up grade A chances that directly lead to goals is an issue. Guys still arent physical enough, they dont watch the backdoor in front of the net at all and they collapse to tight! In the O zone they were way to cute, shoot the puck and get traffic in front. Still very few willing to get into the slot. Cristo is feeling the sophomore jinx. Lack of energy all around and a sense of them thinking about what to do rather than knowing it. Im disappointed!
Bowler started the rebuild a while ago,after trading the veteran d-men Sobolev, Holmes and De'Angelis for 10 draft picks and Walton.
It's probably not far off. Of course they haven't scored more than 4 goals in a game this year. It seems they turn down great opportunities to make an extra pass and it's not needed. As for Costanzo I would agree to an extent but he still has to be better if this is what their offense is going to be.I'm a Greyhounds fan that was at the game today. I see a lot of hating on the vets, but on the bright side, I thought that Jacob Maillet was fantastic. That's the best I've seem him play.
I agree with OHLTG that Costanzo wasn't as bad as it seems. They Greyhounds had a lot of prime chances in those 19 shots and there was definitely some puck luck.
I thought the Spits biggest issue was goal scoring skill. They had good speed, competed hard defensively, and caused a lot of turnovers. It just seemed that where the Greyhounds got by that last defender or potted chances in tight, the Windsor forwards were turning the puck over, missing the net, or settling for outside shots. I was sitting on the edge of my seat dreading a prime scoring chance on several occasions and they rarely came to fruition.
The DeAngelis deal is clearly a sign they are rebuilding. They've already recouped decent amount of picks. Just need a 3rd this year and a 2nd next year.Sobolev/Holmes weren't sticking around, regardless. They have to deal enough OAs to get to their limit. The DeA deal was "reshuffling", as Bowler put it. If they get below 3 OAs and start dealing current 04s, then it's rebuilding.
The DeAngelis deal is clearly a sign they are rebuilding. They've already recouped decent amount of picks. Just need a 3rd this year and a 2nd next year.
Just a fancy way of saying it .I don't disagree that a rebuild is needed, just going on what Bowler said that it's not a "rebuild" but a "reshuffling." That's why I wondered if the rebuild, officially, would start earlier than expected.