HockeyPops
Registered User
- Aug 20, 2018
- 7,831
- 6,917
Pareto Principle. In a nutshell it's similar to the idea of low hanging fruit. 20% of the problems cause 80% of the issues.
And now you jinxed it! Although losing is not the worst thing.Random thing - the Spitfires have played in two (2) Leap Day games since 1999. They're 2-0; one at home, one on the road.
Newbury won't be back at all imo. Guessing the Spits didn't vet the hiring process.Newberry gone for the season. Suspension from Hockey Canada. BOWLER for the rest of the season behind the bench?
Should just get rid of them all when season is done.I am guessing Newbury won't be back at all. Guessing the Spits didn't vet the hiring process.
Bad hiring..Bowler will not make any comment. Ask Hockey Canada? Anyone know what happened in Newberry's past ? Bowler hired him with or without the knowledge of pending discipline. Shaky ground, wonder why someone mid-season wants to join a bottom feeder club at the time. Now have the answer. Thin ice, take any job offered??
Absolutely . This is a as bad a hire as Smith. There is no way in the hockey circles Bowler was not aware of pending discipline for his past.Bad hiring..
Maybe u turn a blind eye for friends...Absolutely . This is a as bad a hire as Smith. There is no way in the hockey circles Bowler was not aware of pending discipline for his past.
Yes, not a good look especially not wanting to answer the why's when asked.Absolutely . This is a as bad a hire as Smith. There is no way in the hockey circles Bowler was not aware of pending discipline for his past.
Agree. The hush hush to why he was suspended is definitely concerning and Bowler stating he will not comment on it tells me he liklely new better and hired him anyways.I want to know what Bowler knew and when. If he knew before hiring, it shouldn't have happened.
I will argue some things for Bowler but no way you can defend this.Agree. The hush hush to why he was suspended is definitely concerning and Bowler stating he will not comment on it tells me he liklely new better and hired him anyways.
Agree. The hush hush to why he was suspended is definitely concerning and Bowler stating he will not comment on it tells me he liklely new better and hired him anyways.
The broadcast tonight said Bowler said he will not comment about it and to ask Hockey Canada about it. I didn't go to tonight's game.Where did he say no comment? (I haven't seen, that's all)
Chris the p by p guy said there would be no comments from Bowler and he said contact hockey Canada if you wish more info, so Nick laughed and said did he give you the phone number? There was a smerk in there.Where did he say no comment? (I haven't seen, that's all)
Exactly. Nothing to smirk about though.Chris the p by p guy said there would be no comments from Bowler and he said contact hockey Canada if you wish more info, so Nick laughed and said did he give you the phone number? There was a smerk in there.
I am supposed to get the missing 20 minutes of Watergate. After that I will contact Hockey Canada about this.I want to know what Bowler knew and when. If he knew before hiring, it shouldn't have happened.
I think the smirk was directed at Bowler.Exactly. Nothing to smirk about though.
Than it is warranted. No pun intended lolI think the smirk was directed at Bowler.
Joey will be. Teams are always willing to move OA's though, I'm not worried about the other two spots a year+ out.The 05s are Outwater, Costanzo, Martin, Winegard, Eichler, Greenwell. That's not a strong group and those are your 19 year olds in 24-25. I would be hard pressed to commit to any of those for an OA year.