OHLTG
Registered User
And ya rd 2 KW looked like an 8th seed, so I guess it's more of a Windsor wasn't a true 1 seed?
You could argue Windsor's D wasn't up to snuff with being a top seed, sure. No arguments here. That said, it doesn't remove the fact that hockey people outside of here had the same "The Rangers are better than their record" opinion. "They're much better than an eight seed and Windsor needs to be careful" isn't exactly an excuse or bad thing to say but that could be just me.
As far as the London comment you referenced you are wrong. Totally wrong. But way to defend the org and BK lol. Again that wasn't it lol. Ya coulda just asked instead of assume
I'm not defending anyone. I made an observation. "Legend mentioned London and RVE is a London guy so... two and two?!" Was it the height/weight of Peer? Players often grow at that age so wouldn't have even factored into "what could RVE be thinking is a qualifier?"
The comment was about something else in the post. I'd explain but probly would get a timeout. Those with cred don't need to justify a post, those without........
Sorry, I'm not big on guessing games lol "this is what I was talking about... and now I turn it to you." Easy peasy.