windsor7
Registered User
- Nov 29, 2015
- 10,339
- 3,169
AgreedI've asked this before. You'll never get an answer and because no such comparison is done it really makes it a useless stat.
AgreedI've asked this before. You'll never get an answer and because no such comparison is done it really makes it a useless stat.
I've asked this before. You'll never get an answer and because no such comparison is done it really makes it a useless stat.
It's just a guess...I don't see 'returning goals' as useless. They might not always hit projections but knowing which teams return 75% of their goals versus, say, 25% of their goals, is interesting to know.
It’s a good thing you like your ‘06’s because you don’t have any ‘05’s and you’re not gonna have any ‘07’s or ‘08’s.It's called winning a conference title something totally foreign to you
Yes he has no answer for his team
You got that right,he cant get over last year's choke job up 3-2 in conference final then bye bye next 2 games,now down 3-1 in this year's playoffs and then huffing and huffing on this site.
No response to their drafting this year despite higher picks then Windsor, then no class appearance on this site ,unprovoked, I dont troll on their forum not sure why it happens here.
It's just a guess...
It’s a good thing you like your ‘06’s because you don’t have any ‘05’s and you’re not gonna have any ‘07’s or ‘08’s.
So are a lot of other things in sports. Do you toss those aside, too?
Agree with what you said,for example Guelph has been mentioned as a contender for next year ,as of now projected to have 4th most goals returning plus an OA could be added,Ottawa another team mentioned as contender next year has 4th most goals returning,1 solid goalie,plus 2 open OA spots,plus OA goalie to trade ,4th most points returning, Saginaw Mem Cup host ,5th most goals returning, 1 open OA spot, 6th in points, and you saw what Brock Otten said via twitter for Windsor 7 of top 10 point producers able to return,goaltending set,2nd most points projected to return,only Sudbury has more.I don't see 'returning goals' as useless. They might not always hit projections but knowing which teams return 75% of their goals versus, say, 25% of their goals, is interesting to know.
I don’t agree I think Maggio Wright others showed heart but just couldn’t execute. Constantini was a wall and stepped up at right time. They were out coached. Plain and simple.Crazy. I mentioned in the OS forum that even when the game was out of reach, the Attack never stopped skating. Watching the Windsor series, the Spits never started skating. Cant for the life of me figure out why.
I've asked this before. You'll never get an answer and because no such comparison is done it really makes it a useless stat.
Agree with what you said,for example Guelph has been mentioned as a contender for next year ,as of now projected to have 4th most goals returning plus an OA could be added,Ottawa another team mentioned as contender next year has 4th most goals returning,1 solid goalie,plus 2 open OA spots,plus OA goalie to trade ,4th most points returning, Saginaw Mem Cup host ,5th most goals returning, 1 open OA spot, 6th in points, and you saw what Brock Otten said via twitter for Windsor 7 of top 10 point producers able to return,goaltending set,2nd most points projected to return,only Sudbury has more.
Nor an exact science but then nothing is.
Rose coloured glasses. I watched both series. The difference was quite evident.I don’t agree I think Maggio Wright others showed heart but just couldn’t execute. Constantini was a wall and stepped up at right time. They were out coached. Plain and simple.
Close to useless..Projection is a part of sports. Sometimes it's wrong, good or bad, and sometimes it's right. They can be ignored if desired but they're far from useless.
IMO returning goals or points has always been a crap shoot. Lots of times players returning benefitted from a 19 year old or OA that was the main reason for most of the points.I don't see 'returning goals' as useless. They might not always hit projections but knowing which teams return 75% of their goals versus, say, 25% of their goals, is interesting to know.
Projection is a part of sports. Sometimes it's wrong, good or bad, and sometimes it's right. They can be ignored if desired but they're far from useless.
Just saying the game has moved ahead of retunring goals and +/= as important stats like 15 years ago.
Interesting you didn't comment on Brock Otten 's twitter regarding Windsor for next season,lines up with mine,check it out,u claim to fair prove it.Projection is a part of it for sure.
BUT revelance is important. Teams don't rely on simple 30 year old measuring sticks for projections and if they do they are getting lapped. Just saying the game has moved ahead of retunring goals and +/= as important stats like 15 years ago.
In hindsight maybe they were using HLs stats for the last 13 years.
It means nothing without context.I don't see 'returning goals' as useless. They might not always hit projections but knowing which teams return 75% of their goals versus, say, 25% of their goals, is interesting to know.
It means nothing without context.
That's the point, the validity of the stats is what's being called into question. You need to demonstrate their usefulness not that they're merely interesting, or else why bother mentioning them? And if someone provides those stats year after year, and cannot explain whether they have any value or merit because they couldn't be bothered to go back and check, then it makes you wonder why they're continually mentioned. So, it's an entirely fair question to ask whether there's anything to those numbers. E. G. It could very well be the case that those stats are meaningless for predicting the success of a team the following year, and if so, once again, I ask, why bother? Fair question?You'd clearly use more than just returning goals, but that doesn't take away their validity.
Correct, but simply listing returning goals without historical data such as where each team finished the previous 1, 3, 5 years is basically useless... and with context? It's useful.
Nowhere did I question the heart or desire of the Spits. I said they didnt skate. Stop painting your bias on a factual statement.Great post. Boys did not get it done but no one should be attacking their heart or desire. Maggio’s interview alone showed he has heart! He’s battled hard for Windsor for years!
Fans were all excited and players were psyched on some moves but not at expense of blowing up chemistry of locker room, which happened. Results followed. In this league, almost every team has talent and Kitchener was a fierce and formidable opponent. What sets really good teams apart is not an individual player or two but the chemistry and consistency of the players on and off the ice. Those trades hurt because those 05s were blindsided and the 06s realized they were going to be left on a team w limited future potential given lack of draft choices. Then injuries and BB had to go bring up players. Lots happened and clear failures. But boys deserve for otherwise amazing season. Wish them every success.
Correct, but simply listing returning goals without historical data such as where each team finished the previous 1, 3, 5 years is basically useless
That's the point, the validity of the stats is what's being called into question. You need to demonstrate their usefulness not that they're merely interesting, or else why bother mentioning them? And if someone provides those stats year after year, and cannot explain whether they have any value or merit because they couldn't be bothered to go back and check, then it makes you wonder why they're continually mentioned. So, it's an entirely fair question to ask whether there's anything to those numbers. E. G. It could very well be the case that those stats are meaningless for predicting the success of a team the following year, and if so, once again, I ask, why bother? Fair question?