Burrowsaurus
Registered User
- Mar 20, 2013
- 44,720
- 17,686
Regardless of what Dorion has done this season the roster if Murray's vision and could take another 5 years to get turned around again.
To be honest I really wished that they hired a GM from outside of the organization.
Let's say they miss the playoffs again this year. Who would you like to See being brought in from the outside to overview the whole hockey operations department [including Dorion]
I like Dorion and Boucher. Give Dorion money to bury Ryan and Phaneuf and he could turn this team around in 1 summer
I like Dorion and Boucher. Give Dorion money to bury Ryan and Phaneuf and he could turn this team around in 1 summer
It doesn't really matter. Dorion is an extension of Murray so we will have to wait until all of Murray's signings have either been good or bad moves before Dorion's watch will truly start.Let's say they miss the playoffs again this year. Who would you like to See being brought in from the outside to overview the whole hockey operations department [including Dorion]
It doesn't really matter. Dorion is an extension of Murrayso we will have to wait until all of Murray's signings have either been good or bad moves before Dorion's watch will truly start.
This is it exactly. You can still get out from under bad contracts IF Melynk would open up his wallet and buy them out.
Melnyk is not going to do that to Murray.Not necessarily. There's a way around that. Creating a president of hockey ops role above the GM. To oversea all hockey ops. Similar to when Shanahan came in for Nonis in TO. Don't have to wait long at all for that to transpire. Then from there evaluation can take place and accountability can finally be put into action on the management level.
Not really. Phaneuf on Toronto looked decent. Coming to Ottawa he has regressed so far. his value is not the same as that from the starting of last season.Neither Phaneuf or Ryan need to get bought out. Ryan could return something decent with no retention, Phaneuf could return something decent with retention. Look at what we gave up for Phaneuf - basically Michalek (will be dealt for a 3rd or so), Lindberg, and a 2nd. If we retain, we could get something similar.
Not really. Phaneuf on Toronto looked decent. Coming to Ottawa he has regressed so far. his value is not the same as that from the starting of last season.
Melnyk is not going to do that to Murray.
Melnyk has pretty much gave Murray a life contract to do as he pleases. No one is going to come in and undermine what Murray has built even though it should be done.
You make good points, but you're missing the real point - Phaneuf is not a very good player.
There are a ton of option on all these players, looks what Detroit did with Datsuk And a Florida did with their salary.
Lots of options on the table, you do t have to go all in on a declining player who is way overpaid. Trade makes sense when it's explained to you, then you look at it on the ice and it doesn't make sense.
The "he's a fitness freak he can play at a high level for a while " seems to be untrue as he was never very swift to begin with. So any regression whatsoever is a massive hinderance.
Also the "Andy wasn't a starting goalie for a while, therefor he can be elite weeellllll past the time other goalies start regressing" is also seeking as if it was BS. So odd.
Look at the structure of Anderson's contract compared to the structure of Lehner's. Sometimes GMs pump players tires and tell white lies to put trades over. I think it is fair to speculate that at one point or another the Senators weren't expecting Anderson to hold up as a #1 goalie throughout the entirety of his contract. Trading Lehner might have had more to do with them giving up on Lehner than them choosing Anderson. Ultimately, goaltending is the last thing I'd worry about, at least long term, because this off season will provide a great opportunity for the Senators to pick up a goalie who otherwise wouldn't have been available via trade if teams try to leverage themselves against the expansion draft.
This is it exactly. You can still get out from under bad contracts IF Melynk would open up his wallet and buy them out.
If you buy out Bobby Ryan, you have 3.5 million in dead cap space and save 3.75 million dollars. Now if you reeeaaaaally lucky, you might get a player almost the calibre of, i dunno, let's say a Bobby Ryan type for 3.75 million. If you're reeeaaaally lucky!
If they can sign him before the expansion draft, wouldn't it be great if we could right a wrong and get Bishop back? Wishful thinking but maybe not impossible.
True, we might, that would be pretty lucky, wouldn't it?.....or we might have one of our kids on an ELC play well enough to get 15 goals and some good assist numbers.
...or we can trade Ryan in another year or two for something halfway decent (and thus not have a cap penalty).
There are all sorts of options out there. We aren't 'stuck' with these contracts if the team is willing to do something about them whenever they decide to make changes.
going forward sure, but doing that before Dorion was promoted was when it should have happened is what I am saying.Murrays essentially already out of the picture. The keys to the car are handed down to Dorion. It wouldn't be unreasonable tp think that Melnyk could possibly undercut Dorion for some needed outside help if they miss again. Think of the lost revenue he will miss out on again if they miss. He wont be a happy camper. Which could become catlyst for some changes like this
If the Zibby + 2nd for Brassard deal is any indication of Dorians trading talents... expect the Sens to get wrecked in more deals