- Dec 10, 2012
- 41,284
- 19,450
It’s okay. You have some unnecessary reason to defend Firstov and blame Guerin for him not sticking. Reality is the opposite, but you do you.
Right, like I said, it appears like you do not understand.
It’s okay. You have some unnecessary reason to defend Firstov and blame Guerin for him not sticking. Reality is the opposite, but you do you.
The Wild wanted him HERE last year. This is nobody’s fault but Firstov’s.
Imagine going into a new job and in the second week you give your employer the middle finger to go somewhere across the world to do the same thing (and be mediocre at it). Then coming back a year later, still being mediocre, and expecting a higher level position.
The issue isn’t going to Russia. The issue is giving your employer the middle finger.
He's fired Tim Army and promoted Matt Murray?iowa has been a dumpster fire and guerin has done nothing im aware of to improve that team.
Imagine wanting a player to develop in the minors, and then "flee" home at the first sign of adversity. Then be told that player should be gifted time in the big show.Down on the Farm: Firstov Aims for Minnesota | Minnesota Wild
2019 draft pick working towards start in St. Paulwww.nhl.com
Imagine uprooting your entire life to chase a dream, have an opportunity to go home and develop, and be with family and then told your selfish?
Look at the abysmal development rate in Iowa over the years and the abysmal record. People love touting that "YOU CAN'T TANK, IT'S BAD FOR MORAL" and then Iowa has been a terrible team and yet it's a good place to develop players?
Funny thing I remember is Avs fans warning Wild fans about Tim Army and how bad of a coach he was - and yep. He was. Who would you want to develop from Igor Larinov or Tim Army?
The issue is that if playing in the KHL is good enough for Yurov and Khusnutdinov, it should be good enough for Firstov to at least get a look in the NHL.
In the end, it isn't a big deal, because Firstov is another prospect that the Wild mismanaged and is now a bust for them.
However, logic dictates that if they thought he was going to be any sort of NHL player, they'd treat him different.
Yeah, Iowa was bad last year. The year before the lost the qualifying round for the playoffs. That really doesn't qualify as "a terrible team". Have they been great? No. But one bad year doesn't make them terrible either.
View attachment 873640
Imagine wanting a player to develop in the minors, and then "flee" home at the first sign of adversity. Then be told that player should be gifted time in the big show.
I don't think that's the gotcha you think it is. After getting to the 2nd round, Iowa couldn't even get past the qualifying round of the playoffs and got swept. They've added more talent and still can't get to the playoffs. They also have an abysmal rate of developing any type of scoring forward. Boldy and Rossi and...Duhaime? Dewar? Shaw? And Boldy was there for only 25 games.Two can play the spin game.
Yeah, Iowa was bad last year. The year before the lost the qualifying round for the playoffs. That really doesn't qualify as "a terrible team". Have they been great? No. But one bad year doesn't make them terrible either.
View attachment 873640
Tuch.Flee? He was given the opportunity to go home and play and stay with his family. Also what adversity? He was home sick. Should Boeser be criticized for commenting he wanted to be traded to Minnesota because he was homesick? Should we criticize Parise or Suter for signing for Minnesota because they got homesick? Also no one said gifted time, but given the opportunity to show what he had in the NHL and if he didn't look good, just send him back. There was no issue with just letting him play a game or two to see if he had ANY skills. BTW, did you even read the article I posted?
I don't think that's the gotcha you think it is. After getting to the 2nd round, Iowa couldn't even get past the qualifying round of the playoffs and got swept. They've added more talent and still can't get to the playoffs. They also have an abysmal rate of developing any type of scoring forward. Boldy and Rossi and...Duhaime? Dewar? Shaw? And Boldy was there for only 25 games.
Forgot about Tuch, because he was literally shipped off to Vegas.Tuch.
Imagine wanting a player to develop in the minors, and then "flee" home at the first sign of adversity. Then be told that player should be gifted time in the big show.
Two can play the spin game.
Yeah, Iowa was bad last year. The year before the lost the qualifying round for the playoffs. That really doesn't qualify as "a terrible team". Have they been great? No. But one bad year doesn't make them terrible either.
View attachment 873640
Are we sure we can't take credit for developing Kaprizov? Maybe we slipped him diet plans and stick-handling drills in fake rocks on the sidewalk in Moscow?
If you'd like. I don't particularly care about Firstov's situation.I think if you bring Kaprizov into the conversation, we have to acknowledge that it's okay for players to develop in the KHL, and then we kinda have to absolve Firstov of his sins (aka leaving Des Moines to go play in Russia for a couple years). Are we ready to do that?
If you'd like. I don't particularly care about Firstov's situation.
Interesting to see the 2 sides though.
Personally, I wouldn't categorize it as "selfish prick", but I do see a bit of a difference between somebody drafted out of the KHL that stays there for a bit, and somebody drafted out of the NCAA, that goes back just because he didn't like the AHL (saying this as what I believe, not knowing 100% of the facts). Especially if he was being counted on to make that AHL less of the dumpster fire that people are describing.I'm just trying to pave the way to an understanding for people who think he's a selfish prick for choosing to go back to the KHL. Won't lose sleep over his contract being terminated though.
Personally, I wouldn't categorize it as "selfish prick", but I do see a bit of a difference between somebody drafted out of the KHL that stays there for a bit, and somebody drafted out of the NCAA, that goes back just because he didn't like the AHL (saying this as what I believe, not knowing 100% of the facts). Especially if he was being counted on to make that AHL less of the dumpster fire that people are describing.
A nothing NHL player.I'm not sure you can count on him to make the AHL less of a dumpster fire at the same time that you're writing him off as a nothing player. In my opinion, if you think he's a nothing player, you probably shouldn't get mad and hold a grudge if he decides to try his hand in Russia, and if you think he's got a potential future here, why isn't he getting an opportunity in the NHL like Khusnutdinov and Ohgren did?
My guess is Guerin wanted him to take the Beckman route, and I don't blame Firstov for wanting to try a different way at all, and it's Guerin's right as GM to cut that cord if he wants.
I just don't think you can call Firstov a selfish prick (understand that you did not do this, speaking in general terms) for doing what's best for him and his career, as these guys only have a finite number of years to make enough money to live comfortably for the rest of their lives, and not call Guerin a selfish prick for trying to strong arm him into making less money with a higher cost of living on the other side of the world away from his family.
A nothing NHL player.
It's a partnership, but it's also and employer/employee relationship. The team does have a say.That's not really fair to Firstov, which, fine, you can say they don't have to be fair to Firstov. But Firstov also doesn't need to do right by them if they're not going to do right by him.
I think Firstov has bigger ambitions for his career than Guerin did, and I don't blame him at all for trying to realize those.
Both the team and Firstov have a say. Sounds like they were saying different things. Now Firstov is free to go wherever he can get something he wants. Neither side is a selfish prick. Can we agree on that and call it a day?It's a partnership, but it's also and employer/employee relationship. The team does have a say.
Sure.Both the team and Firstov have a say. Sounds like they were saying different things. Now Firstov is free to go wherever he can get something he wants. Neither side is a selfish prick. Can we agree on that and call it a day?
No, I totally agree that it’s Guerin’s fault. It’s his fault for not identifying that Firstov is a loser and a quitter fasterRight, like I said, it appears like you do not understand.