WestCoast CyberG
Registered User
- Nov 5, 2018
- 533
- 361
Kadri lets his mouth do all the fighting no need to drop the gloves and do anything, better to just beak off and walk away it worked for Cooke.
As mentioned - they scored roughly 1-2 seconds after the Goodrow penalty ended. Whether or not that was a deciding factor or not it still swung in the Leafs favour almost instantly.
Fluke goal...definitely...but it was still likely as a result of having had the extra man.
This is what I saw happen.
Honestly I didn’t really even notice the PBP getting that upset. San Jose usually has great broadcasts.
No it didn't because the Sharks scored like three minutes later to tie it up and later took the lead into the intermission.
Yes of course, I'm sure Naz was just minding his own business playing a clean, quiet game when the big bad sharks started antagonizing him.
This thread is dumb.
The only people who look bad are those who didn't see the game. Look, I know it's Kadri and all but they were trying to fight him off the start. He was slew footed, he got hit to the back of the head a few times. Sharks players were targeting him the whole game. Even the coach acknowledged this
This has everything to do with Kadri and Thornton's fight last year when Kadri got some of his beard hair during it.
For some reason I doubt you would say the same if it were MarchandKadri has fought a few times but he is another one of those cowardly rats. I'm sure he did something to earn the attention. Seeing above, yes it all makes sense.
Yeah it was 1-1 with like 55 minutes left to play. Toronto’s next 4 goals were all off the rush caused by San Jose breakdowns.No it didn't because the Sharks scored like three minutes later to tie it up and later took the lead into the intermission.
Once again - they gave up 2 PPs (one of which led to a goal), negated a PP and instead went 4 on 4 on another (if I recall the Leafs also scored on that 4 on 4 but I may be mistaken?). How is that not an impact? Who cares if the Sharks came back? There are very few goals scored in any given game - the Leafs needed 4 to win, and because the Sharks were stupid from the moment rubber hit ice, they got one of the 4 they needed.
So I'd say it had - at minimum - a 25% impact on the Leafs win.
Edit: Nope - I wasn't wrong. Kapanen's first goal came on the 4 on 4 (which should have been a Sharks PP).
Yeah it was 1-1 with like 55 minutes left to play. Toronto’s next 4 goals were all off the rush caused by San Jose breakdowns.
They went into the intermission 3-2 instead of 3-0 since both of the Leafs 1st period goals were related to penalties taken against Kadri.
I agree that Kadri didn't have to work very hard to antagonize the Sharks, but they obviously had the wrong priority this game. The Leafs got 2 goals after the Sharks had 2 dumb penalties going after him. The Sharks should have game planned a bit differentlyThe Tavares goal can happen to anyone at any time. It's merely coincidental that it happened after an expired penalty. The Kapanen goal was poor officiating and an awful turnover. That is par for the course for San Jose this season. You give Kadri too much credit for what is circumstantial more than anything else. These things are things that the Sharks have needed to clean up all season and have failed to do so.
The Tavares goal can happen to anyone at any time. It's merely coincidental that it happened after an expired penalty. The Kapanen goal was poor officiating and an awful turnover. That is par for the course for San Jose this season. You give Kadri too much credit for what is circumstantial more than anything else. These things are things that the Sharks have needed to clean up all season and have failed to do so.
I agree that Kadri didn't have to work very hard to antagonize the Sharks, but they obviously had the wrong priority this game. The Leafs got 2 goals after the Sharks had 2 dumb penalties going after him. The Sharks should have game planned a bit differently
I'm not giving Kadri credit for anything, I'm saying the Sharks were dumb.
Also your entire argument is based on circumstantial stuff, specifically that the Sharks responded after the goals and thus the penalties that led to them don't matter.
why are you so intent on dying on this hill? Teams who are on their game don't take a penalty that leads to a goal against right from the opening face off, nor do they take runs all game that lead to other goals againstThey had one dumb penalty. The other penalty was a bad call. Pretending like it all influenced how the Sharks played or the result is being overly generous.
Nothing about their game changed due to the incident. That's the point. It's not why they lost. People thinking it is are pretending like it got them off their game. It didn't.
why are you so intent on dying on this hill? Teams who are on their game don't take a penalty that leads to a goal against right from the opening face off, nor do they take runs all game that lead to other goals against
They had one dumb penalty. The other penalty was a bad call. Pretending like it all influenced how the Sharks played or the result is being overly generous.
Nothing about their game changed due to the incident. That's the point. It's not why they lost. People thinking it is are pretending like it got them off their game. It didn't.