RefalancheStillLose
irreverent
- May 24, 2014
- 9,415
- 7,554
Yeah but who likes baseball?Salary Cap= Parity. Smaller markets would have no chance to compete otherwise
Looking at the MLB....Snoooooooozzzzzzzzzze
Yeah but who likes baseball?Salary Cap= Parity. Smaller markets would have no chance to compete otherwise
Looking at the MLB....Snoooooooozzzzzzzzzze
Yeah but who likes baseball?
LTIR is a thing, you know
Its a loophole, not meant to help you with your cap. Teams are just shamefully taking advantage on that.
Salary Cap= Parity. Smaller markets would have no chance to compete otherwise
Looking at the MLB....Snoooooooozzzzzzzzzze
Salary Cap= Parity. Smaller markets would have no chance to compete otherwise
Looking at the MLB....Snoooooooozzzzzzzzzze
No, salary cap = cost certainty.
It has NOTHING to do with parity.
the cap isn't tied permanently to a 50/50 split of HRR ( although that is what it is now, at least for a while) and having a cap floor absolutely forces some teams to spend up to it ( creatively) to ATTEMPT ensure parity by NOT allowing the rich teams to use their financial might to keep the not rich teams relegates to second class developmental teams like in some leagues.That's not why there's a salary cap. It's to ensure a 50/50 split of HRR as an attempt to stabilize the financial health of all 31 franchises.
Does LTIR count towards expenditure and escrow or is it 'off the payroll'? Seeing a list like the leafs if that counts towards escrow the players would be getting burned.
You've been on this site for 15 years, since 2004, and you don't yet understand why the NHL and the NHLPA bargained LTIR into the CBA, and how the salary cap works?
If you don't get it by now, I don't think there's any further and other explanation that has not already been given.
the cap isn't tied permanently to a 50/50 split of HRR ( although that is what it is now, at least for a while) and having a cap floor absolutely forces some teams to spend up to it ( creatively) to ATTEMPT ensure parity by NOT allowing the rich teams to use their financial might to keep the not rich teams relegates to second class developmental teams like in some leagues.
Actually, it's one of the best. Parity is the reason the NFL is king in the US while the MLB has fallen off dramatically. It's why the MLB and NBA have progressively moved more and more towards a hard cap model. It's fun in the short term to have a few elite teams running around but it's unhealthy in the long run.Salary cap is the worst idea for the league in a long while.
It does count toward payroll and thus, escrow. The more LTIR, the less there is left for the remaining players.Does LTIR count towards expenditure and escrow or is it 'off the payroll'? Seeing a list like the leafs if that counts towards escrow the players would be getting burned.
people that werent athletic enough to play hockey and/or to slow to follow the puck on TV.
Salary cap is the worst idea for the league in a long while.
What? Baseball doesn’t require you to be athletic?people that werent athletic enough to play hockey and/or to slow to follow the puck on TV.
Considering how much bigger it is than hockey, I’d say quite a few.Yeah but who likes baseball?