The don godfather
Registered User
Solid young core look at today. McAvoy carlo Zacha swayman pasta jake Frederic now poitras and lohrei. Unreal.
You didnt answer the why part.Sure, we will do this then
I didn’t say the league was ‘fixing’ games for the bruins, and I don’t think that they are
I said the bruins have been successful for so long due to favorable refereeing
You didnt answer the why part.
Listen to the second ref say “I know” this is systemic and obvious to any and every fan
Just search game management discussions on here, I’m pretty sure you’ve likely posted in some of those discussions.
Who denies that this happens in the NHL??
I guess my mistake was starting with the game evidence, in retrospect I should have begun my evidence with the fact that refs game manage. I thought this was commonly accepted knowledge by now, but I over estimated how tuned in you guys are to the league here
The argument isn’t that the bruins win the cup every year, the argument is that they get favorable treatment by refs when calling penalties.
This doesn’t mean they never have a penalty called against them or that they never lose.
It means that the bruins have been so successful due in part to favorable refereeing
Now can we stay on this topic?
This makes more sense and I actually agree to some extent. I think its the same in the playoffs for all teams. Games have never been called by the book. Games would never finish.I think the ‘why’ is due to their style of play. I think the refs feel like they can’t call all the penalties or it would be ‘unfair’ so they let teams like Boston, who play the way they do, get away with more than other teams who play more clean
If games were called by the book, Boston would either be forced to change their approach, or they would be in the penalty box much more than their opponents, and likely lose a lot more games.
It’s not just Boston, I think the early 2000’s leafs benefitted from the same thing.
Meh, I totally disagree.This makes more sense and I actually agree to some extent. I think its the same in the playoffs for all teams. Games have never been called by the book. Games would never finish.
No that's being in your basement by yourself.
Yah it was. It's still less tight in the playoffs than regular season. Grinding, hitting teams can have advantageMeh, I totally disagree.
Games used to be much worse. Lemieux used to have to carry 3 guys on his back to score. The refs started calling it tighter and players adapted.
That's an opinion. It's an insane, asinine opinion, but it's an opinion.
This makes more sense and I actually agree to some extent. I think its the same in the playoffs for all teams. Games have never been called by the book. Games would never finish.
Meh, I totally disagree.
Games used to be much worse. Lemieux used to have to carry 3 guys on his back to score. The refs started calling it tighter and players adapted.
If so, can we apply this template to all teams and all situations ? We’ll just make random arguments using one game sample size to push whatever agenda suits us in that moment. It will certainly debating hell of lot simpler.And if (BIG IF) the Bruins were given preferential treatment in that one game, we are now to use that as a template going forward in order to build out the case.
You still need some remedial communication work. It isnt the Bruins you are wailing about, its checking, tough, playoff style hockey. Some teams dont do as well.So can we finally move on and talk about it?
Or do we still need more remedial work to get in the same page?
Sure, we will do this then
I didn’t say the league was ‘fixing’ games for the bruins, and I don’t think that they are
I said the bruins have been successful for so long due to favorable refereeing
Im truly flabbergasted at this, furthermore I’m not sure of what your tactics are so I’m going to skip this and save what little sanity I have left this afternoon.Sure, the Leafs took more penalties than Boston did but committed less infractions total.
The refs held off calling a powerplay for the leafs (even though they had multiple opportunities, legitimately several opportunities) until Boston was winning 2-0, there was no way the refs, with the bruins down 1 game to none were going to call a leafs powerplay until Boston was winning the game.
How’s that? Next, if you want to participate, you can count the infractions in the video and see what the variance in infractions vs penalties are for both teams.
Once this pattern is established, let’s find some other games were that pattern might be repeated
Good thing they give Boston favorable refereeing, because since the '19-'20 season to today, the Bruins are the 3rd most penalized team in the NHL. Imagine how bad it would be if they didn't get favorable refereeing.
No, you’re not at all understanding.
If you guys would have looked at my example you’d know what I’m talking about.
The bruins get less penalties than they commit, what’s the ratio to other top teams? Hard to say, you’d need to do a study.
And cleaner teams get MORE penalties than they really deserve.
This makes it appear to be fair in something like a box score or a spreadsheet
This is why it looks like the bruins committed less penalties than the leafs did in game 2 in 2019. Because that’s what the box score says. But if you watch the game, it’s pretty obvious that that isn’t the reality.
So looking at the logs is irrelevant
I can tell you that over the same time frame as them being ranked 3rd in penalties taken, they are at -58 in net penalties (they took 58 more penalties then the drew), which ranks 27th. Colorado ranked #1 by drawing 158 penalties more than they took.
The idea that Boston gets favorable officiating is laughable
So can we finally move on and talk about it?
Or do we still need more remedial work to get in the same page?
Game management /= favoritism.So can we finally move on and talk about it?
Or do we still need more remedial work to get in the same page?
The Leafs got 5 straight power plays against the Jets last night. Apparently they are favored by the refs.If so, can we apply this template to all teams and all situations ? We’ll just make random arguments using one game sample size to push whatever agenda suits us in that moment. It will certainly debating hell of lot simpler.
Another detractor with a bruins pfp
Fancy that!
I think they believe their profile picture hides the large amount of Leafs board activity they have.Doesn't like the facts. Attacks the messenger.
Fancy that.
Have I demonstrated that the Blue Jackets are a better team than the Maple Leafs?
Game management /= favoritism.
The Leafs got 5 straight power plays against the Jets last night. Apparently they are favored by the refs.
Here are the highlights:
And here is the box score:
Winnipeg Jets vs. Toronto Maple Leafs Box Score: January 24, 2024 | Hockey-Reference.com
Get the latest box score updates on the Winnipeg Jets vs. Toronto Maple Leafs game played on January 24, 2024 on Hockey-Reference.comwww.hockey-reference.com
DEFINITIVE PROOF!!!!!
I think they believe their profile picture hides the large amount of Leafs board activity they have.
Just another Leafs fan trying to detract from the Bruins success.
Fancy that!
We know, the bias in your opinion has been obvious from the startI’m a leaf fan, all my life
So pressure on the refs to give the Leafs some PPs, so they can mask the real goal of not giving the Leafs PPs? Could it be the Leafs play pond hockey and it doesnt work in playoff type, high effort, checking games?I didn’t say the refs favored the bruins, I said the receive favorable refereeing. Theres a difference, and you’ve been putting words that I didn’t say out there this whole conversation.
That leaf game? 100% fishy as f***. I’m glad you’re finally on board here.
My first thought about that 5 PP in a row was that the refs know people are noticing the leafs haven’t been getting nearly enough powerplays due to how they manage the games, so this would be a bit of a boost for them to crawl out of bottom 2-3 in the league
I’m a leaf fan, all my life
I didn’t say the refs favored the bruins, I said the receive favorable refereeing. Theres a difference, and you’ve been putting words that I didn’t say out there this whole conversation.
That leaf game? 100% fishy as f***. I’m glad you’re finally on board here.
My first thought about that 5 PP in a row was that the refs know people are noticing the leafs haven’t been getting nearly enough powerplays due to how they manage the games, so this would be a bit of a boost for them to crawl out of bottom 2-3 in the league
I’m a leaf fan, all my life
I'm sure it's been said in 21 pages, but Jack Edwards exudes class and great, which spreads throughout the whole organization.