Bringing this from the Marchand thread:
2017: McDavid (won the Art Ross), Crosby (won the Richard), Bobrovsky (won the Vezina), Burns (won the Norris), Karlsson (2nd in the Norris)
2016: Kane (won the Art Ross), Crosby (finished the year really hot and was 3rd in points), Benn (2nd in points), Holtby (won the Vezina), Thornton (tied for 4th in points)
2015: Price (won the Vezina), Ovechkin (won the Richard), Tavares (2nd in points), Dubnyk (3rd in Vezina voting) and Crosby (3rd in points, 1st in PPG)
2014: Crosby (won the Art Ross), Getzlaf (2nd in points), Giroux (3rd in points), Varlamov (2nd in Vezina voting) and Bergeron (won the Selke)
2013: Ovechkin (won the Richard), Crosby (finished tied for 2nd in points in 12 less games), Tavares (carried a bad team to the playoffs), Toews (won the Selke), Bobrovsky (won the Vezina)
2012: Malkin (won the Art Ross), Stamkos (won the Richard), Lundqvist (won the Vezina), Giroux (3rd in points), Quick (2nd in Vezina voting)
2011: Perry (won the Richard), Sedin (won the Art Ross), St. Louis (2nd in points), Rinne (2nd in Vezina voting), Thomas (won the Vezina)
2010: Sedin (won the Art Ross), Ovechkin (2nd in both goals and points while missing a bunch of games), Crosby (won the Richard), Miller (won the Vezina), Bryzgalov (2nd in Vezina voting)
2009: Ovechkin (won the Richard), Malkin (won the Art Ross), Datsyuk (won the Selke and was 4th in points), Mason (won the Calder, 2nd in Vezina voting), Parise (5th in points)
2008: Ovechkin (won the Richard and Art Ross), Malkin (2nd in points), Iginla (3rd in goals on a bad team), Lidstrom (won the Norris), Brodeur (won the Vezina)
It seems pretty clear how the Hart is awarded, it's based on these criteria:
1. Be on a playoff team.
2. Win another major trophy (Vezina, Art Ross, Norris or Richard)
3. If you don't win another major trophy, finish at the top of the league in points.
4. Win a minor trophy (Selke mainly) or be a finalist for another major trophy.
The Hart has never been voted on based on team strength, or rather, no one has ever won based on team strength. I genuinely have no idea why people here insist that carrying a bad team or not having much support makes a player Hart worthy. The Hart has never been voted on that way. If you have to point to the rest of a team to support why player A deserves the Hart, then he doesn't deserve the Hart.