If the premise is that right now, 2 years out, a team is planning on being terrible in the bottom 3 that season, there would need to be buy in from ownership to management to the HC on that direction starting now. There are GM/HC who can't afford to be a bottom 3 team in 25/26 and still be employed afterwards.
Probably looking at clubs who are on the downward swing. Calgary is most likely as looking at their contract situation, guys like Rasmus Anderson, Coleman and others they could trade well in advance of the 26 TDL. Really hard to say the others being 2 years out. Pitt and Wash are nearing the end but Sid would put Pitt in too high a spot to be terrible bad. Wash, think they made a bunch of moves to get Ovy as close to Wayne's record as they can for 24/25. Once he gets it, most likely in the first half of 25/26 season, they can then move Carlson at the TDL in 26.
For the teams that have been very bad in the bottom 3/4 since 2022, which GMs would still be employed if they were bottom 3 bad in 2 years? Can they have 1) multiple young prospects perform well & 2) still being an overall bottom 3 club. Detroit, once Seider and Raymond arrived, they moved from 4/5th worst to 8/9th worst in their first 2 seasons in the NHL. The development of their young players may push them outside the bottom 3 in 2 years time.