Kevin Musto
Hard for Bedard
- Feb 16, 2018
- 22,943
- 29,631
You don't like him at 2?The Levshunov propaganda is overwhelming today
I think it's an okay pick, not a great one.You don't like him at 2?
At least we aren’t going after Lindstrom. That’s the one that’ll be a straight up mistake.I think it's an okay pick, not a great one.
Media is just really pushing him as the guy today.
I like Levshunov's tools for the most part. A lot to like, but I think there is a scenario where he's like a 5D like a below average player and I think other guys have better floor and ceiling combos.
If you take the injuries out of the equation, he's a better pick than Lev.At least we aren’t going after Lindstrom. That’s the one that’ll be a straight up mistake.
I don’t think he has everything you look for, and I don’t think he projects as a 1 or a high end 2 at the NHL level. He has the potential to be, but I don’t project that level.I mean, there's a scenario in which any highly-touted prospect busts and becomes a replaceable player.
Levshunov has excelled since coming to N.A.. He has everything you look for in an impact defensemen in the game today. There's no reason to think he's going to be a 5D.
I don’t think he has everything you look for, and I don’t think he projects as a 1 or a high end 2 at the NHL level.
He doesn’t check the thinking box for me. Also the compete is inconsistent. He’s rarely put it all together. I haven’t liked his puck game under pressure.What box doesn't he check? How does he not project as a top-pairing D in the NHL?
He doesn’t check the thinking box for me. Also the compete is inconsistent. He’s rarely put it all together. I haven’t liked his puck game under pressure.
It's a real thing.Literally the only place I see concerns about Levshunov's hockey sense is on this board. Peters, Pronman and Wheeler don't share the skepticism.
The problem with needing a star in this draft is there aren’t guarantees after Celebrini. Every player from 2-12 has their warts, so to say Lev has major issues while other guys have star potential is wrong.On top the controller disconnected moments, Levshunov also has the lamest highlight package Ive ever seen for a top prospect.
Doesn't carry the puck much on zone entries. No clips of him manipulating oppenents with pace and/or creativity. Since he doesn't have much creativity and skill he can't hold onto the puck for long since he gets stripped of it by forecheckers if he tries to make moves. Average slapshot/wristshot.
Most of his offense comes from quick passes in transition and whipping a low shot on goal fron the point and either scoring through a screen or creating a rebound. Projectable? Sure, but he needs to have much more in his arsenal to score at the rate of a 1D.
Yes he scored at a very impressive clip this season and you would assume he's only going to improve upon that. But same things were said of Matthew Wood last year...
Im obviously very harsh on him, but we need a STAR and I don't see how he has the tools to ever become that.
It feels like in a draft of uncertainty (beyond Celebrini), Levshunov is a safe pick.The problem with needing a star in this draft is there aren’t guarantees after Celebrini. Every player from 2-12 has their warts, so to say Lev has major issues while other guys have star potential is wrong.
If you took this draft and combined it with the 2023 draft, Celebrini might be the only guy to crack the top 10.
Seems like I disagree with them then.Literally the only place I see concerns about Levshunov's hockey sense is on this board. Peters, Pronman and Wheeler don't share the skepticism.
As far as consistency, he was a freshman D, in his second year in N.A. And if an inconsistent Levshunov gets you 35 points in 38, just imagine if he improves, as you'd anticipate he will.
Hopefully they go for the exciting swing on wherever that second first ends up being.It feels like in a draft of uncertainty (beyond Celebrini), Levshunov is a safe pick.
And that's probably what the Blackhawks see. A guy that they know will have a long NHL career.
But I don't think it's an exciting swing for upside.
I think that's likely.Hopefully they go for the exciting swing on wherever that second first ends up being.
Can we bring receipts from the game reports on Demidov then? Nearly every game: careless with puck, trying too much, turnovers abound.It's a real thing.
There are moments when you watch him play where you can see the gears in his head grind to a halt, and then he'll just shovel the puck off somewhere random.
It's a common enough occurence that I don't see a top pairing guy either.
You're the only one making this a Demidov vs Levshunov debate.Can we bring receipts from the game reports on Demidov then? Nearly every game: careless with puck, trying too much, turnovers abound.
They all have knocks.
Demidov thinks the game at an elite level. Combine that with the shot and the puck skills and I’m a lot more confident in the ability to translate to the next level. When you can’t think you can’t playCan we bring receipts from the game reports on Demidov then? Nearly every game: careless with puck, trying too much, turnovers abound.
They all have knocks.