VanIslander
20 years of All-Time Drafts on HfBoards
Before the others, please. If there's justice.Zetterberg
Weber
(Edit: Botterill is also a solutely necessary when you think of women's Olympic hockey.)
Before the others, please. If there's justice.Zetterberg
Weber
I don't have an opinion, but some possibles in random order are:
Mogilny
Datsyuk
Marleau
Gonchar
Meghan Duggan
Jennifer Botterill
Brind'Amour
Miller
Keith Tkachuk
Kovalchuk
Zetterberg
Cujo
Weber
What about Gonchar, he must be closeHard to keep Shea Weber out. 5 times he is top 4 for the Norris. Twice 2nd team all-star, Twice 1st team all-star. Both of the times he finished 2nd in Norris trophy voting he easily could have been the winner. I think he left Nashville at the wrong time as they went to the Cup final after he left, and I think it hurts him being on Nashville and then a sad sack Habs team. But this was who you want as a defenseman. He wasn't going to get you 70 points a year, but he played in every single situation and I would call him an elite defenseman. Plus he was excellent in the Olympics. I don't know how you keep him out.
Datsyuk and then Zetterberg are the most deserving after that and on that list alone the only ones I would induct. I have no idea how Ryan Miller could get win when we don't even put the likes of Cujo, Beezer, Moog, etc. in.
Apart from that list Fleury is still a good choice. I think Vernon opened up a bit of a door for goalies you can argue and I think Turgeon did it for forwards too. Not that I like the doors being opened for more undeserving guys, but they are just a long list of many who have done this.
Maybe open up the discussion on J-C Tremblay again. And I am sure Middleton is talked about regularly.
What about Gonchar, he must be close
Hard to keep Shea Weber out. 5 times he is top 4 for the Norris. Twice 2nd team all-star, Twice 1st team all-star. Both of the times he finished 2nd in Norris trophy voting he easily could have been the winner. I think he left Nashville at the wrong time as they went to the Cup final after he left, and I think it hurts him being on Nashville and then a sad sack Habs team. But this was who you want as a defenseman. He wasn't going to get you 70 points a year, but he played in every single situation and I would call him an elite defenseman. Plus he was excellent in the Olympics. I don't know how you keep him out.
he’s rob blake with no cup or norris
but man, rob blake without hardware would be reaaaaally tempting to leave out wouldn’t he?
I think Weber's Norris voting record may be better than Blake's, even without a Norris.
I had to look and surprisingly they're pretty much even (counting Blake's win).
Blake: 1,3,3,4,5
Weber: 2,2,3,4,4
What argument does Marleau have other than the games played record?My pick were:
Datsyuk (First Ballot)
Zetterberg
Mogilny
Weber (First Ballot)
Hold Marleau for one more year to induct him together with Thornton and might consider one of Roenick, Tkachuk or Damphousse in 25. One more spot? Chara for another first ballot.
The face of a franchise and its scoring leader (and will be for a very long time) and scoring over 550 goals in the nhl.What argument does Marleau have other than the games played record?
I think he'll eventually make it. But he shouldn't. He's had two seasons in his career where he finished top 10 in goals. He's an accumulator more than a great goal scorer. His GPG would be more impressive if he played like 500 fewer games.The face of a franchise and its scoring leader (and will be for a very long time) and scoring over 550 goals in the nhl.
A bit like Turgeon with points, with 566 goals Marleau will be the players with the most goals in league history not in the Hall, you need to go down to Pat Verbeek at 522 goals, 15 spots down to find someone with less goals not in.
Once Roenick become the most points not in the hall guy that would also I imagine create a narrative, talks and pressure to get in at some point.
Obviously someone need to be and Verbeek will never make the hall, but compiling a lot of something his valued a lot by hall voters (and players in general, probably feeling in their bones what it means to do it for so long more than us and giving credit for it more).
Since 1990 players with more even strength goals than Marleau: Jagr-Ovechkin-Selanne-Iginla-Crosby, that the list.
Probably mean, played 500 more games ?His GPG would be more impressive if he played like 500 fewer games.
If not Marleau for the Shark, would it be Nolan, Burns or Thornton ?Is he the face of the franchise? More like the 1/2 face of a franchise known for playoff disappointments during his career.
I'd say Thornton/Marleau. The face of the franchise shouldn't lose their captaincy. Both of those guys did. It wouldn't be Nolan, Burns, or Couture though. Maybe the Shark logo itself is the face of the franchise?Probably mean, played 500 more games ?
If not Marleau for the Shark, would it be Nolan, Burns or Thornton ?
He played 500 more games as a Shark than Thornton and did absolutely nothing outside of San Jose both helping him to be.
Depending on Couture, longest captain tenure as well, 2004 to 2009 ?
The face of a franchise and its scoring leader (and will be for a very long time) and scoring over 550 goals in the nhl.
A bit like Turgeon with points, with 566 goals Marleau will be the players with the most goals in league history not in the Hall, you need to go down to Pat Verbeek at 522 goals, 15 spots down to find someone with less goals not in.
Once Roenick become the most points not in the hall guy that would also I imagine create a narrative, talks and pressure to get in at some point.
Obviously someone need to be and Verbeek will never make the hall, but compiling a lot of something his valued a lot by hall voters (and players in general, probably feeling in their bones what it means to do it for so long more than us and giving credit for it more).
Since 1990 players with more even strength goals than Marleau: Jagr-Ovechkin-Selanne-Iginla-Crosby, that the list.
What argument does Marleau have other than the games played record?
He was never one of the league's top forwards either statistically or using the eye test. Disappeared in the playoffs. His numbers aren't impressive considering he played more games than Gordie freakin' Howe.
Gordie Howe was an impact player in his 40's. Marleau was just hanging on to break the games played record.He hold all sorts of records with Sharks. Sharks became contender due to him (they were in WCF before getting Thornton). He is Mr. Sharks. Plus, 2 gold medal for Canada helps him a lot.
Plus, don't talk like unathletic person that Howe's game record is easy to broke. There were reason why those records stands. It is almost impossible to broke until Marleau did it. Marleau only bad in his last 3 seasons which is normal btw.
Furthermore to say, Howe's performance in Whalers is also stat compiling one. Because he is 50+, we give him a leeway.
"His numbers isn't impressive". Any 1000/1000 players are in their own class. To say his number is not impressive is straight up bs and acts as bland counter arguement.
Playoff choker... Lots of player in Hall are playoff choker - Dionne, Ciccarelli, Sundin and so on. He did manage several WCF and also being in one SCF so he is better than Dionne in that regard.
Gordie Howe was an impact player in his 40's. Marleau was just hanging on to break the games played record.
I'm not saying he sucks or is the offensive equivalent of Stu Grimson. I'm just saying he doesn't belong in the Hall of Fame.........I know he'll get there anyway because of how the committee votes.
I think Weber's Norris voting record may be better than Blake's, even without a Norris.
I had to look and surprisingly they're pretty much even (counting Blake's win).
Blake: 1,3,3,4,5
Weber: 2,2,3,4,4