BTP
Registered User
- Apr 28, 2013
- 4,575
- 6,024
I wouldn't be so sure, especially now that they added Meier who is very physical. Their fourth line plays a decent amount and is also very physical. I heard that Palat loves to get gritty in the playoffs. On the defensive side they don't hit a lot but they are big and use that to their advantage. Hamilton, despite being tall, is probably the softest. Marino is on the smaller side but somehow almost always win physical battles. Now, if by "grit" we mean fights, we might be the softest or one of the softest teams.Devils by far the softest.
The Lightning would love it if the Leafs had Clifford and/or Simmonds in the lineup.
For softest, I think it might be the LA kings or Jets.
Lowry, Dillon and the rest of the team just showed Minny that isn't true.Years past I might have said Islanders are the gritiest but not sure if they are now. I think it is either the Stars or the Bruins.
For softest, I think it might be the LA kings or Jets.
Curious how others see the playoff teams on the pugnacity scale
east coast bias lolJets the softest? LOL. What did you base that on?
Not this year we have Schenn and If need be they can call up Clifford or Simmonds.
Jets the softest? LOL. What did you base that on?
No mention of the Oilers? They seem grittiest to me. . .
OK, based on you watching two games. Thanks for the clarification rofl.Based on the games the Leafs played vs them they were extremely soft on the puck especially their core forwards outside of Dubois. I think that is more important than hitting or whatever which they didn't really do much of either
OK, based on you watching two games. Thanks for the clarification rofl.
Some Leafs fans on these boards make me laugh..
Mentioning Matthews, O'Reilly, and Knies in a thread that has to do with grit.
Majority of teams have like 6+ guys upfront who play with more grit than those 3.
I don’t think I've ever seen O'Reilly play physical, and I definitely don't recall him ever scraping. Don't let the big boy beard fool you.
Every fanbase in here is doing the same thing, pal.OK, based on you watching two games. Thanks for the clarification rofl.
Oilers game plan is usually to fly through neutral zone with speed for controlled zoned entries. And if you try and clog up the neutral zone or force dump ins absolutely hammer their Dmen on the forecheck.I think they are somewhere in the upper middle of grit. Hyman, Kane, and a bunch of depth guys play the grindy role well and then you have Nurse and Desharnais who are pretty tough customers.
But I don't think that is their team identity whereas with Dallas for example they want to run you out of the building. I think the Oilers first gameplan is to generate odd man rushes and if physicality happens then it happens
Oilers game plan is usually to fly through neutral zone with speed for controlled zoned entries. And if you try and clog up the neutral zone or force dump ins absolutely hammer their Dmen on the forecheck.
Every fanbase in here is doing the same thing, pal.
You could always ignore the thread if you have a problem with everyone's opinions.Notice how I didn’t comment on which team I thought was the softest. If the rest of you want to spew opinions based on complete ignorance without bringing up some metrics (size, weight, hits, fights, etc.), don’t mind me for chuckling, especially when you’re wrong.
Especially against Tampa, they aren't the bastion of physicality themselves. Leafs just need to play their game and unless Vasi is unstoppable (which could happen) they should beat Tampa this year.Yup, would be extremely stupid to dress either guy under any circumstance. Leafs are playing great hockey without them, they provide nothing offensively, are liabilities defensively, but sure they hit and fight.
Huh. I said they aren't soft. How does someone win a Smythe being soft? Matthews was about playing a physical brand of hockey. And Knies well.. You are just ignorant of Knies I guess because he is certainly not soft.
The other guys were the grit but regardless, people are allowed their opinions that's why I made the thread.