Maybe so, but how many posters can say if they never saw them play? I saw Rod at the end.
I agree the title could be best ever that you saw or something else.Ok but then OP shouldn't make the topic 'best ever'
I saw Ratelle, Gilbert in their primes, Park/Tkachuk and after as rookies
My dad raised me a Ranger fan, he went back to the '30's, wish I could ask him for his list
Brian leetch...and honestly it's not even that close.
And I'm a huge Henrik guy.
This is how I feel. The longevity henke held throughout his career and the fact he dragged teams into the playoffs that had no business kind of pushed him over for me, while also being an organizational icon for over a decade. Leetch was unable to do that throughout his career although he was an incredible player.I feel like Hank was on the same level, but maybe for a bit longer.
Leetch, for a number of debatable reasons, really was never quite the same player after this 29th birthday.
This is how I feel. The longevity henke held throughout his career and the fact he dragged teams into the playoffs that had no business kind of pushed him over for me, while also being an organizational icon for over a decade. Leetch was unable to do that throughout his career although he was an incredible player.
Good point. Leetch was a bit like McDonough in that the leadership role didn't really fit his personality. A bit of an introvert and he needed a real leader to supplement his outstanding play. Lundquist was in a class by himself in his prime, both as a superstar, the face of the franchise and a true leader; highly unusual for a goaltender. That is why IMHO he was the greatest Ranger of them all.I do think Lundqvist thrived on being "The Guy" more than Leetch did. That's not a knock on the latter by any means. But Lundqvist had the same mindset that Messier did, and Jagr did. He knew he was the most important piece of the team, and he wanted everything that went along with it.
I think Leetch, for all his amazing talent, was probably more comfortable being one of the top guys on a team. I think that's why Messier was such an important addition to the Rangers and was really instrumental in Leetch being "Leetch" for us.
According to Sega Genesis.Tom Poti
I’m an idiot because I thought this post was recent…..I was like is EDGE BACK?!?! But alas this post is like 2 years old lolI feel like Hank was on the same level, but maybe for a bit longer.
Leetch, for a number of debatable reasons, really was never quite the same player after this 29th birthday.
Frank said the greatest all around player who played for the Rangers was Bill Cook. The original Ranger.Frank Boucher......
I'm still salty about the Leetch trade. Guy should have played his whole career.
I'm even more salty they didn't bring him back for 05-06 given that their biggest need all season was an offensive defenseman and Leetch was allowed to finish his career as a Bruin, ugh.
Leetch would have done great on that '06 team. Instead we got late season Sandis Ozolinsh to try and fill the void.![]()
I'm 100% with you there. I even started to like a couple posts and was thinking how great it is that @Edge was back.I’m an idiot because I thought this post was recent…..I was like is EDGE BACK?!?! But alas this post is like 2 years old lol
@nyrmetros you really dug way back to bring this thread back
Yup, the "haul" was awful. Obviously what happened with Sauer was terrible, but given what we now know about susceptibility to concussions being hereditary and his brothers' struggles it's obvious in hindsight.Me too. Look at this "haul" we got for trading him. Sauer was the karma.
Maxim Kondratiev, Jarkko Immonen, a first-round pick in the 2004 draft, which became Kris Chucko (pick was later traded to the Calgary Flames), and a second-round pick in 2005, which became Michael Sauer.