Who has the better Cup window? Panthers or Leafs

PaulD

71,73,76,77,78,79,86,93
Feb 4, 2016
31,933
18,943
Dundas
I swear I misread the post.. I read this:

Who is more likely to win a Cup.. the team that just won a cup and was in the finals the year before or the team that can't get past round 2. And I like the Leafs roster and how they're built but why are we comparing them to a team that has been to the finals 2 in a row and still has a strong roster?

I swear I misread the post.. I read this:

Who is more likely to win a Cup.. the team that just won a cup and was in the finals the year before or the team that can't get past round 2. And I like the Leafs roster and how they're built but why are we comparing them to a team that has been to the finals 2 in a row and still has a strong roster?
Leafers like to play "make believe"
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jeremy2020

Sticksandsun

Registered User
Mar 11, 2015
2,194
4,518
Going forward it unquestionably is the Leafs, only because Florida will simply cap and age-out of its window, as happens with any great team. This isn't a slight against Florida or even a compliment to the Leafs. It's simply the nature of two teams at different stages.
Most of Florida's roster/core is in their mid to late 20s, taking them into their early 30s for the next 3-4 years.

Are you expecting a drop off in offense, defense, goaltending or 2 of 3, all of them?

The Leafs definitely have some great players but also need a true #1 goalie and cheap productive depth to offset the cap space eaten up by 4-5 players.

This is why I posed the question from earlier threads with Florida and Toronto.
Toronto seems close to going on a run but missing key pieces IMO, Florida will have to overcome playing so much hockey in the last 2 years, basically half of another season.

Also, Bob is either white hot or dark blue cold and Knight isn't there as a #1 yet, Leafs have similar goaltending questions but related to playoff experience.
 

FriendlyGhost92

Registered User
Jun 22, 2023
4,463
5,399
I guess I don't get why OP cited two poll threads but didn't make this thread a poll.

... Anyways, Leafs automatically lose due to their cap structure. Even with Bobo at a hefty price, the Leafs still have four players being paid more. Gross.
 

Sticksandsun

Registered User
Mar 11, 2015
2,194
4,518
I guess I don't get why OP cited two poll threads but didn't make this thread a poll.

... Anyways, Leafs automatically lose due to their cap structure. Even with Bobo at a hefty price, the Leafs still have four players being paid more. Gross.

I prefer reading and analyzing the opinions posted and not getting lost in the tally of a poll.
Kind of forces a reply instead of a quick vote and exit thread.
 

x Tame Impala

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Aug 24, 2011
28,942
14,049
There's no need to overthink this. Florida has a much better salary cap structure in the near to mid term. I'm sure people will blame state income tax for that, but the Panthers are paying a hair less for Barkov, Reinhart and Forsling than the Leafs are for just Matthews and Nylander.

Toronto is also run by Brad Treliving. Easy call, IMO.
This is the answer. I’m not sure what happens with Marner and Tavares but I’m assuming they’ll try and sign Marner to another huge contract and perpetuate the cycle. The Leafs core players don’t care about winning. They want to make as much money as they can and have great regular seasons.

Florida is a better built team and they’re in a great position going forward specifically because Ekblad, Bobrovsky, and Bennet are UFA’s. They can let these guys walk if they see fit and use that cap space accordingly.
 

Evilhomer

Registered User
Oct 10, 2019
5,724
5,656
Most of Florida's roster/core is in their mid to late 20s, taking them into their early 30s for the next 3-4 years.

Are you expecting a drop off in offense, defense, goaltending or 2 of 3, all of them?

The Leafs definitely have some great players but also need a true #1 goalie and cheap productive depth to offset the cap space eaten up by 4-5 players.

This is why I posed the question from earlier threads with Florida and Toronto.
Toronto seems close to going on a run but missing key pieces IMO, Florida will have to overcome playing so much hockey in the last 2 years, basically half of another season.

Also, Bob is either white hot or dark blue cold and Knight isn't there as a #1 yet, Leafs have similar goaltending questions but related to playoff experience.
I think people are over-thinking this. Florida has been to two straight Cup finals. How many more do they have in them? Are they realistically going to bump up against the 1980s Islanders or Oilers? The odds are that Florida will follow Tampa's path. Eventually age and the cap will take their toll on Florida, that's all. The better comparison for me would have been Toronto to a team in a similar situation - maybe the Rangers, Wild, etc. - teams that have not just come off two Cup final runs.
 

Space umpire

Registered User
Nov 15, 2018
3,277
2,663
Cocoa Beach, Florida
Reporting states Sam Reinhart would pay 1.1 mil more in taxes if he played in California.

1.4mil more in taxes to play in Toronto.

1.5 mil more in taxes to play in nyc.

It’s more than 10%. His aav is under 9. It’s close to 15%.

I’d guess Sam doesn’t care as much about palm trees as he does millions of dollars.
Your numbers are flawed. A) You fail to account for road games being taxed by that state.
B) You fail to consider signing bonuses which are taxed at a players home states rate ( not where they play, where they legally reside.

Matthews for instance has nearly all of his pay as signing bonus. His legal residency is in Arizona. Which has no state income tax.

Plus you keep stating 10% which is telling that you are either making the number up but think it’s correct or lying on purpose to help your case.
 

PaulD

71,73,76,77,78,79,86,93
Feb 4, 2016
31,933
18,943
Dundas
What I don't understand is why the Panthers are always being compared with the Leafs, and vice versa. Seems like it's been that way for several years.
Panthers are the team to beat.
Bruins get compared with them
Bolts, Leafs too ......all Atantic play off teams.
No other team in the Atlantic teams ever make the play offs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VivaLasVegas

Stephen

Moderator
Feb 28, 2002
82,057
60,209
Most of Florida's roster/core is in their mid to late 20s, taking them into their early 30s for the next 3-4 years.

Are you expecting a drop off in offense, defense, goaltending or 2 of 3, all of them?

The Leafs definitely have some great players but also need a true #1 goalie and cheap productive depth to offset the cap space eaten up by 4-5 players.

This is why I posed the question from earlier threads with Florida and Toronto.
Toronto seems close to going on a run but missing key pieces IMO, Florida will have to overcome playing so much hockey in the last 2 years, basically half of another season.

Also, Bob is either white hot or dark blue cold and Knight isn't there as a #1 yet, Leafs have similar goaltending questions but related to playoff experience.

The question you should be asking is whether Florida can quality control and maintain the standard they achieved in 2023-24 with loss of personnel and wear and tear. Barring unforeseen roster changes and behavioral shift in the Leafs, I don't see a measuring stick for Florida at all.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VivaLasVegas

Dread Clawz

LAWSonic Boom
Nov 25, 2006
28,167
10,229
Pennsylvania
Indeed. However, the league has revenue sharing in place to compensate for some teams being in better markets, plus there is a salary cap to significantly reduce the advantage.

The tax advantage has no such checks and balances which makes it a more significant advantage that is also outside teams' control. They can strive to increase revenue or make their location more desirable, but they can't adjust their state tax. Some teams effectively operate under a different salary cap than others.

Therefore it is not a "lazy argument", but rather a very valid one even if it isn't the only one.

Tampa and Florida both in the top half of revenue now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VivaLasVegas

VivaLasVegas

Registered User
Sponsor
Jun 21, 2021
8,320
8,899
Lost Wages, Nevada
This Leafs' core has basically proven that they are not capable of a serious Cup run.

Treliving should have blown it up, but he's apparently committed to perpetuating playoff failure as long as possible.
 

Space umpire

Registered User
Nov 15, 2018
3,277
2,663
Cocoa Beach, Florida
If you consider “local” things such as taxes I feel there needs to be 2 more things included in cap (cost/income) determining.
A) Bonus monies paid and the tax rate of each individual players legal residence.
B) Commercials and sponsorships by each player.
Using the Leafs as example… they are insanely popular in the Toronto metro region. I’d venture (guessing) while it’s the star players leading the way a guy like Matthews makes more doing commercials locally than the entire Panther team combined.

That is millions of additional dollars paid to players in certain markets that is not available in all markets.
 

Stephen

Moderator
Feb 28, 2002
82,057
60,209
This Leafs' core has basically proven that they are not capable of a serious Cup run.

Treliving should have blown it up, but he's apparently committed to perpetuating playoff failure as long as possible.

Unless this group of Leafs somehow takes the next level in development and goes on an unexpected growth and maturation… kind of like Florida actually did… I don’t think they have it in them. They’ve been pretty flat line on being who they are… but I also think it’s unrealistic for a 100 point team to start blowing it up for change mandate reasons. Like Carolina probably isn’t winning a cup soon but why would they dismantle a competitive team?

But getting back to the OP, comparing Florida to Toronto is like asking for a compliment.
 

brentashton

Registered User
Jan 21, 2018
16,058
23,283
Leafs

1735264120234.gif
 

Dread Clawz

LAWSonic Boom
Nov 25, 2006
28,167
10,229
Pennsylvania
If you consider “local” things such as taxes I feel there needs to be 2 more things included in cap (cost/income) determining.
A) Bonus monies paid and the tax rate of each individual players legal residence.
B) Commercials and sponsorships by each player.
Using the Leafs as example… they are insanely popular in the Toronto metro region. I’d venture (guessing) while it’s the star players leading the way a guy like Matthews makes more doing commercials locally than the entire Panther team combined.

That is millions of additional dollars paid to players in certain markets that is not available in all markets.

Exactly, "taxes" is dumb and lazy.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad