It's a tough call, and I'll be happy with either Stutzle or Byfield... But I lean Byfield based on shear potential alone. Is Stutzle a better player right now?? Maybe. But Byfield's ceiling is essentially non-existent. I mean seriously, what's his ceiling?? I don't think anyone in the hockey world can actually give an educated answer on that. He's a 6'4, 214 lb 17 year old with elite skating and elite offensive skill.... what?!? He could legitimately be a 6'5/6'6 235 lb center who can skate like the wind and make plays all over the ice. When's the last time the NHL saw a player like that?
We throw out comparisons like Kopitar, Malkin, Draisaitl.... and if Byfield ends up being even close to those players the Kings will be in amazing shape.... but the crazy thing about Byfield's potential is that.. he could legitimately end up being better than those players. And I know that's a little crazy to say, but his potential is literally that high. Also, he's working with the same trainer as McDavid... Imagine how scary he could become if he keeps getting stronger and better and manages to preserve his elite speed??? So he'll be training with the same guy as McDavid and he'll be going to the Anze Kopitar School For Elite NHL Centers (Vilardi and Turcotte can be his classmates)...... that sounds pretty damn promising to me.
And I LOVE Stutzle's game... He's so fun to watch and it's hard not to become completely infatuated with his game. But in my opinion, Byfield's potential is literally too incredible to pass up. And yes, I understand he may not reach his potential.... But imagine if he does. Imagine if he ends up as a more dominant player than say Jack Eichel for example. And the Kings just.... passed on him because "Oh we have some other centers that could be pretty good".
Some centers can play wing, others can be traded to address other organizational needs. You don't pass on a player like Byfield, IMO.