When will we see the first $20m a year player in the NHL?

hoglund

Registered User
Dec 8, 2013
5,925
1,361
Canada
The CFL is not the best football league nor has the best football talent and doesnt make similar money for a reason. The football is just not good in comparison to the NFL and the fans know it, thats why they spend their money to watch and support the NFL and not CFL. You dont make more money as a sports league by enslaving your players and trimming their capital from them lmfao. Its just a ridiculous comparison on your part.
I agree, it's the same reason the women's professional hockey doesn't pay as well as NHL.
 

1989

Registered User
Aug 3, 2010
10,530
4,194
Either are you
And matthews is currently using that strategy to $200 million in career earnings.

By his agents advice
Yes, the exception to the rule is certainly the best example to use - and if Matthews gets a bad injury this season?

I doubt your average high school-educated NHL athlete knows much about finances, but hey, everyone remembers when a player signs a "Show Me" bridge contract that works out but not the 100s of other short-term "I bet on myself and lost" contracts that failed because of injuries, stalled development, etc.

Professional athletes, especially in hockey, have short careers for earnings potential. Even superstars can lose lots of potential money very quickly with bad choices in RFA/UFA negotiations.
 

BKarchitect

Registered User
Oct 12, 2017
8,357
15,039
Kansas City, MO
Joe Sakic made $16.45 million in 97-98…that’s $31 million today.

The fact that a mediocre MLB or NBA player makes as much if not more than the best hockey player astounds me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HabsQC

Breakers

Make Mirrored Visors Legal Again
Aug 5, 2014
23,163
21,941
Denver Colorado
Yes, the exception to the rule is certainly the best example to use - and if Matthews gets a bad injury this season?

I doubt your average high school-educated NHL athlete knows much about finances, but hey, everyone remembers when a player signs a "Show Me" bridge contract that works out but not the 100s of other short-term "I bet on myself and lost" contracts that failed because of injuries, stalled development, etc.

Professional athletes, especially in hockey, have short careers for earnings potential. Even superstars can lose lots of potential money very quickly with bad choices in RFA/UFA negotiations.

And that still doesn’t change the fact that players are trying to land on a 8 year deal in their early 30’s not late 20’s

Pretty easy to grasp
 

MadLuke

Registered User
Jan 18, 2011
10,892
6,365
Matthews is at what 13.25 millions.

3% a year inflation/revenus grow and we would reach 20 millions in about 14-15 years, 5% would take 8-9, 2% would take like 20 something.

Really hard to predict, league revenues grow, cap rules for max contract, there is a world where league revenues decline instead of growing and that never happen, average nhl fan age, cable tv difficulty, giant competition for eye balls... would not be that surprising if it peaked and it is just raw barely following inflation no actual grow from here if not decline.
 

olli

Least biased user
Dec 2, 2016
3,881
2,143
Canada
Oilers will probably give McDavid around 16x8 so not for awhile. If Bedard and Celebrini along with other top young guys pan out then they’ll probably get to 20M on their 2nd contracts assuming they don’t get bridge deals on their first deals.
 

JiricekSaveUs

Danila Yurov Fan Club Executive Assistant
May 2, 2018
19,315
12,271
Sooner than you think… Kaprizov is getting at least 16M in his next deal. McDavid could get 20 if he wants it.
 

Drake1588

UNATCO
Sponsor
Jul 2, 2002
30,304
2,974
Northern Virginia
I do wonder when superstars will start demanding the max (by percentage), and shorter multi-year contracts so they can keep getting the max rate as it shifts over time. With the cap steadily rising each year, long contracts lock you into the market rate at the start, but then it's outdated within 18 months or so. McDavid should probably be signing two-year or three-year deals at ~20 percent of the cap.

I think the answer is it will happen when the league's best player decides he should be paid like it. The NHL's best players have taken substantially less for a while now, by choice.
 

Hennessy

Ye Jacobites, by name
Dec 20, 2006
14,666
6,168
On my keister
Me.
It's me.
I can't even skate.
Last I tried was in the early 80s. Ankles all splayed out like some idiot.
But I keep dreaming I'm in Hockeyland where I'm my size (6'4, ....uh...210 lbs...yeah).
Am slow on my skates, but takeaways and possession through the roof.
I score at least twice a game because of it.
On that weird "L" shape ice.
But, yeah. I'm pretty good.
 

Russian_fanatic

Registered User
Jan 19, 2004
7,935
2,237
Pre salary cap, wasn't Jagr's salary in his final season with Pittsburgh something like $17 million(including bonuses)? That's crazy considering it was 25 years ago.
 

MadLuke

Registered User
Jan 18, 2011
10,892
6,365
A year (average of the contract) is quite different than peak year salary via bonus.

With the cap steadily rising each year,

A bit like Matthews ?

But since 2019, steadily could be generous

  • 2018-19: $79.5 million
  • 2019-20: $81.5 million
  • 2020-21: $81.5 million
  • 2021-22: $81.5 million
  • 2022-23: $82.5 million
  • 2023-24: $83.5 million

A bit less than 0.95% a year, from 2006 to 2011 it would been great, injury career (or greatness) ending is always right around the corner and if the long contract make it possible to do like Tavares and be frontloaded early bonus heavy your money is likely to growth faster than the cap to balance things out.

And the cap not growing at all like the last 6 seasons is also always possible.

McDavid making 15 millions the first year, 10 millions by the end reproduce this a bit.
 

JiricekSaveUs

Danila Yurov Fan Club Executive Assistant
May 2, 2018
19,315
12,271
McDavid could go on a 1-3 year contract for sure or arbitration awards him 18+/yr
I’m just saying if he went to the market someone would be willing to give him 20 (when the cap rises over 100M)
 

Calderon

Registered User
Mar 24, 2006
1,206
816
Regarding the issue of 20 percent of the cap being too much for one player and a competetive NHL team we're in a situation right now where the Wild is kind of showing that it could be feasible. They still have the dead cap space of 14.7 million yet actually lead the league as of now. Theoretically, CBA allowing, Kaprizov could currently have a cap hit of 23.7 million with the Wild still leading the league. Just an observation.
 

Michel Beauchamp

Canadiens' fan since 1958
Mar 17, 2008
23,322
3,407
Laval, Qc
McDavid is gonna be a UFA fairly soon, and he would be the obvious choice. Thoughts?
As a number of posters stated or hinted at, the fly in the ointment is that pesky rule about no player getting more than 20% of the cap.

I doubt the cap will hit $100M by the time McDavid hits UFA.
 

FastEddie

Registered User
Feb 22, 2019
156
138
Joe Sakic made $16.45 million in 97-98…that’s $31 million today.

The fact that a mediocre MLB or NBA player makes as much if not more than the best hockey player astounds me.
That's not true at all. I don't know much about basketball but there are only 5 players on the court and some of them play the whole game, so it's a different thing. But MLB... on the Jays there are only 5 players making more than Matthews. And 10 players making less than a million, what is basically entry level money in the NHL. In a system without a hard cap.
 
Last edited:

Green

Registered User
Nov 13, 2019
896
502
The real question is if there were no salary cap in the NHL what would Mcdavid get? I am guessing like 40 million a year or something, it is insane with how freaky good McDavid is he is only making a few million more a year than some above average players, I wonder if it bothers him that he is getting paid so little compared to the elites in other sports.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad