Lannes
🇮🇱🇮🇱🇮🇱
- May 5, 2024
- 123
- 286
By this logic, there is not an elite defenseman in the league.Again, let’s see how he does against Dallas.
By this logic, there is not an elite defenseman in the league.Again, let’s see how he does against Dallas.
It's one series tho and Hughes was clearly not himself. We need a larger sample size.Does outplaying the Norris trophy winner (probable) by a large margin head to head in a playoff series count?
what are you doing here? Matthews posted a picture of himself on a boat wearing a nice purse, shouldn't you be fawning over that right now?OIlers going to have Nurse and Bouchard making nearly 20 million and neither can actually defend
I wont discredit you by saying Bouchard hasn't been good, but this +/- stat is not the way to prop up his play.He's also +10 leading the playoffs.
Recency bias at it's finestI have him as a top 3 defenseman in the league right now
He is the only defenceman in the history of the league to have 20 points through the first two rounds of the playoffs.Never.
well... yeah, that's kind of how it works. What a player did 8 years ago doesn't matter at all in current rankings.Recency bias at it's finest
This proves advanced stats are sus.The advanced statistics all showed that Bouchard is the best defenceman in the league and he's proving it in the big games. What a stud.
How does it prove that? If the advanced stats predicted that Bouchard would perform great and he's performed great, wouldn't that be evidence that advanced stats are useful, rather than the opposite?This proves advanced stats are sus.
If you'd take Bouchard over every one else in the league you are high
Right now the NHL only has 4 teams so...Recency bias at it's finest
Good luck with that. It starts at 8x8.Hopefully AFTER he signs a cheap extension with Oilers.
5x5 him Holland!!
Bouchard vs VanNot the most deluded Oiler fan post I've seen but certainly a contender
Hughes was wildly disappointing in that series, for all the Hype he garnered this year with the Norris nomination.Bouchard vs Van
7GP, 4G 7A 11P +7. 8 points at even strength.
65% CF
62.7% XGF
67.29% SCF
67.39% HDCF
10-4 5v5 goals for/against
played 25:55 a night
If that's not a stomping, I don't know what is. Bouchard outperforming Hughes by a wide margin is one of the biggest reasons Edmonton took that series.
Who cares that without him the Oilers would had not won the series... He is an ECHL D-man at best, and the Oilers should not play him.... Eyetest or somethingBouchard vs Van
7GP, 4G 7A 11P +7. 8 points at even strength.
65% CF
62.7% XGF
67.29% SCF
67.39% HDCF
10-4 5v5 goals for/against
played 25:55 a night
If that's not a stomping, I don't know what is. Bouchard outperforming Hughes by a wide margin is one of the biggest reasons Edmonton took that series.
you've migrated here to crap on himIt's one series tho and Hughes was clearly not himself. We need a larger sample size.
I can promise you that number is going to get destroyed in the WCF, Dallas might be the deepest team in the league. Going to be a nightmare trying to line match from Edmontons perspective, expecting this to be over in 5.He's also +10 leading the playoffs.
To have a chance, our stars have to be better than theirs and we're going to need Skinner to be at least Oettinger's equal. A tall task, but not impossible.I can promise you that number is going to get destroyed in the WCF, Dallas might be the deepest team in the league. Going to be a nightmare trying to line match from Edmontons perspective, expecting this to be over in 5.
As for the thread title, when he stops being babysat on defence. Guy has an absolute rocket of a shot, the great thing about him as an Oilers fan is that all his flaws are coachable. I said the same thing about Hughes a year or two ago, so I fully expect these things to be sorted out in the near future for him.
I have some hope as ottinger hasn't been superhuman this spring.To have a chance, our stars have to be better than theirs and we're going to need Skinner to be at least Oettinger's equal. A tall task, but not impossible.
Bouchard's been very good defensively these playoffs too. McDavid and Draisaitl both spoke about how good he's been on both sides of the puck.
He's also now the only defenceman in the history of the league to have 20+ points in the first two rounds of the playoffs.
Here's the thing. If Bouchard(and the rest of the first unit) get outperformed by Dallas, Oilers have just about no hope of winning. In that case, Oilers' other units would need to be playing positive hockey. And the other two defensive pairings? They have been absolutely brutal in comparison to Bouchard+Ekholm. If not Bouchard+Ekholm, which of the two other pairings would be playing positive hockey in their stead?I can promise you that number is going to get destroyed in the WCF, Dallas might be the deepest team in the league. Going to be a nightmare trying to line match from Edmontons perspective, expecting this to be over in 5.
As for the thread title, when he stops being babysat on defence. Guy has an absolute rocket of a shot, the great thing about him as an Oilers fan is that all his flaws are coachable. I said the same thing about Hughes a year or two ago, so I fully expect these things to be sorted out in the near future for him.
A lot of people won't consider him elite as long as he plays with McDavid and Draisaitl. Heck, we see some still suggesting that Draisaitl is just a product of McDavid, so that should tell you what the haters are going to say.All I've seen on here is people saying Bouchard is a PP merchant, product of Ekholm etc.
He's got 37 pts in the past 24 playoff games, he's +10 in plus minus this playoffs, 3 game winning goals. He was 4th highest scoring dman in the regular season with over a PPG and +34 in plus/minus.
I've watched a ton of Oilers games and he passes the eye test too imo. He's often the key to Oilers getting out of their own zone. And his play in the offensive zone is unmatched.
I'm just wondering what he has to do in order for people to consider him elite? He's basically setting playoff records for dmen and nobody gives him notice.
Hughes was at best the 3rd best defenseman in that series. I wouldn't put Zadorov over him just because of QoC but either way he was behind Bouchard and Ekholm.Hughes was wildly disappointing in that series, for all the Hype he garnered this year with the Norris nomination.
Dude is the American Erik Karlsson.
I would say that Dallas has a far better second defense pair than Edmonton does, but I also think that either Kulak and Ceci or Nurse and Desharnais match up very well to Dallas' bottom pair. Edmonton's blueline has looked a lot better the last couple of games, after they flipped up the pairs a bit. Ceci has been playing the best hockey of his life (thank the gods that we didn't flip him+ to Philly for Walker), and Desharnais has been far more reliable than he was a year ago. It isn't perfect back there, that's for sure, but if Nurse can figure his struggles out, then I really don't have any concerns on the Oilers blueline. It's Dallas' scoring depth that could be the biggest test for the Oilers. Even the fourth line could be problematic, Sam Steel always plays well against Edmonton unfortunately.Here's the thing. If Bouchard(and the rest of the first unit) get outperformed by Dallas, Oilers have just about no hope of winning. In that case, Oilers' other units would need to be playing positive hockey. And the other two defensive pairings? They have been absolutely brutal in comparison to Bouchard+Ekholm. If not Bouchard+Ekholm, which of the two other pairings would be playing positive hockey in their stead?
And yes, if they get destroyed by a stronger opponent, then the team's players will likely have negative +/-. That's hardly a knock on an individual player.
Assuming the series is competitive, I'd expect Bouchard's +/- to go up, rather than down.