Shall we look at Makar's numbers without MacKinnon again, perhaps? We've been through this multiple times already. All players, even the best players in the world, see their numbers heavily affected by their teammates. Just for fun though..
Bouchard without Draisait or McDavid: 2.93 GF/60 5v5. (54.29 GF%)
Makar without MacKinnon: 2.22 GF/60 5v5. (40.54 GF%)
Not sure why people still use this argument and keep a straight face while saying Makar is the best Dman in the world. Makar is. But this is normal.
Yup it's definitely normal for sure. Posters are generally lazy when it comes to research. It takes effort to research, and zero effort to post
A great example would be to see how many ppl have said Drai would be nothing without McDavid
Yet anyone who watches the team, or took any time to put in the effort would see Drai has performed fabulously without him. When McD had his first injury, Hall and Drai didn't miss a beat
When McD took his second injury, the RNH-Drai-Yamamoto was one of the best lines in the NHL for months
The whole Bouchard is a product of McDrai is nonsense. Put him w/ Mack and Rant and you would see similar #'s too