When does the Yzerplan start getting criticized?

ricky0034

Registered User
Jun 8, 2010
15,442
7,898
When did they finish 9th last season? News to me.

There’s also essentially no difference between picks 6-10 in NHL potential. Certainly not the last few years

And for the 4th time, utterly hilarious Andrew Copp is both a horrible player and single handedly keeping the Wings out of last place.

this is pretty silly considering the year being talked about had Michkov available at 7
 

ricky0034

Registered User
Jun 8, 2010
15,442
7,898
The player that many teams passed on due to a number of factors.

sky-sky_.gif
 

Boud

Registered User
Dec 27, 2011
13,786
7,340
It seems like Yzerman wanted a bunch of vets around to ease in the younger impactful players coming in, and to have a shot at the playoffs. It kinda worked, but a lot of the moves he has done haven't panned out and/or don't provide great value so it doesn't look good.

I think the real plan was to be competitive when Edvinsson, Sandin-Pellika, B-Nygard, Kasper, Danielson, Wallinder, Cossa etc start making an impact. Majority of the younger Wings players haven't made it to the roster yet so some of these vets are just place holders. People were a bit too fast calling them a playoff team, they aren't there yet.

Not excusing some of the moves that were made but I think in a way this was part of the plan. Detroit was always a bit behind in their rebuild if you compared to Ottawa, and even Ottawa is still trying to find a way. Detroit should be legit in 2-3 years.
 

Hockeyfan2390

Registered User
Nov 19, 2010
9,215
6,757
Kansas City, MO
Not at the state the 2019 Wings were in, no. The roster he stepped into, the 2019-2020 Red Wings were one of the worst non-expansion (or within 2-3 years of expansion) teams of all time. Dead last in the cap era. You don't turn that around in 5 years when Larkin was the only redeemable asset on that team. I mean, he could have done some stupid shit like flipping picks for players, but that's not at all sustainable. That's a one and done playoff run which does no one any good.

He's got a mediocre team right now. But he also has 5 more 1st round picks knocking on the door.

If he wasn’t going to turn it around for them to be at the very least, a playoff team, in half a decade (in a league where literally half the teams make it in), then what was the point of hiring Yzerman?

He was hired to be special, not just another run of the mill GM. Detroit could have hired someone like Marc Bergeron or Jeff Norton or Chuck Fletcher - they’d be right where they are now.

“You don’t turn it around in 5 years when Larkin was the only redeemable asset on that team”? The Vegas Golden Knights and Seattle Kraken literally didn’t exist the last time the Red Wings made the playoffs and had zero roster players. Vegas has made the playoffs every year but one and the Kraken went to Game 7 of Round 2 in their sophomore season.

I can’t understand the hesitancy by you and others to start demanding more and come to terms with the fact that no playoffs after five years on the job (regardless of what he came into) isn’t good enough for someone who was regarded as one of the best, if not the best, GM in the game.
 
Last edited:

Hockeyfan2390

Registered User
Nov 19, 2010
9,215
6,757
Kansas City, MO
I think another 2 seasons, though to be fair we missed last year with the same pts as WSH and if Phi hadn't pulled their goalie when they were already eliminated we get in. People are acting like we were 25 pts out last season or something.
If Detroit hadn’t fallen head first into a wood-chipper in March by looking completely disinterested against opponents like Arizona and Columbus and Pittsburgh, Torts pulling the goalie wouldn’t have mattered.
 

Pavels Dog

Registered User
Feb 18, 2013
20,625
16,241
Sweden
If he wasn’t going to turn it around for them to be at the very least, a playoff team, in half a decade (in a league where literally half the teams make it in), then what was the point of hiring Yzerman?
The point was to do a legitimate rebuild.

“You don’t turn it around in 5 years when Larkin was the only redeemable asset on that team”? The Vegas Golden Knights and Seattle Kraken literally didn’t exist the last time the Red Wings made the playoffs and had zero roster players. Vegas has made the playoffs every year but one and the Kraken went to Game 7 of Round 2 in their sophomore season.
Using expansion teams as your examples completely invalidates your opinion tbh. I would also take Detroit's future outlook over Vegas and Seattle every day. Yes, Yzerman could have greatly sacrificed futures to get into the playoffs and lose a round. It would ruin the inane arguments by some of the haters, but it wouldn't be a benefit to the long-term health of the team.

I can’t understand the hesitancy by you and others to start demanding more
We are demanding more. But we are 3 games into the season. If we're 20-30 games in and not close to a playoff spot there will be building pressure to make changes to the roster and/or coaching.
Again, we are 3 games into the season. 3.
 
Last edited:

norrisnick

The best...
Apr 14, 2005
30,920
16,202
If he wasn’t going to turn it around for them to be at the very least, a playoff team, in half a decade (in a league where literally half the teams make it in), then what was the point of hiring Yzerman?

He was hired to be special, not just another run of the mill GM. Detroit could have hired someone like Marc Bergeron or Jeff Norton or Chuck Fletcher - they’d be right where they are now.

“You don’t turn it around in 5 years when Larkin was the only redeemable asset on that team”? The Vegas Golden Knights and Seattle Kraken literally didn’t exist the last time the Red Wings made the playoffs and had zero roster players. Vegas has made the playoffs every year but one and the Kraken went to Game 7 of Round 2 in their sophomore season.

I can’t understand the hesitancy by you and others to start demanding more and come to terms with the fact that no playoffs after five years on the job (regardless of what he came into) isn’t good enough for someone who was regarded as one of the best, if not the best, GM in the game.
Because the Wings needed a GM.

He was hired to GM the team. That's what he's doing. You ascribing some mythical qualities and subsequent expectations on him is entirely on you.

Do you not understand how the most recent expansion drafts worked? If Yzerman got to ditch everything, get a top 2 pick, and pick a roster full of the 6/7th best players from every team, he'd be much further ahead. Vegas and Seattle didn't start in a flaming pit of shit. Yzerman did.

I demand plenty from Yzerman. But I live in the real world and not some imagined fantasy land where GMs are heroes and can conjure elite players out of nothing.
 

Frk It

Mo Seider Less Problems
Jul 27, 2010
36,760
15,541
I'm saying conventional wisdom is that it's better to either be contending or "tanking" to get future superstars. As is, the Wings finished 9th without significant injury issues and without a youth infusion on the roster. Without "tanking", it makes it tougher to acquire future superstar talent which usually goes high in the draft. Are you stating that 3-year run of signing a bunch of Vets to Mid-out at a time when the bulk of prospects are still in the Minors/Europe/NCAA/Juniors is an ideal stage of a rebuild?

Average age of the Wings Top-16 most utilized Skaters

2021-22: 24.375, Finished 25/32
2022-23: 26.0625, Finished 24/32
2023-24: 28.1875, Finished 18/32

You want to praise the rise in the standings while also noting that the "core" pieces are still developing and so they can't be judged yet. Can't have it both ways big dog.
Criticizing a GM for not more aggressively tanking in a time where the league intentionally put in place a lottery system to deter tanking is a tough sell in my book. Especially when this team in particular has already had 7 years in a row of drafting top 10.

Right now last place gets you most likely pick #3. Up until a year or two ago, it got you most likely pick #4. Most GM's are not going to go out of their way to get pick 3 or 4.

Congrats to you on your team getting lucky and getting Bedard. We were dead last in 19/20 and were rewarded with pick #4.

Tanking is not too viable of a gameplan for a GM nowadays.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nbwingsfan

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad