haohmaru
boomshakalaka
How that is relevant to subject? Jagr scored more goals than Messier. So what?
Well, this is a puzzling sentence.
How that is relevant to subject? Jagr scored more goals than Messier. So what?
How that is relevant to subject? Jagr scored more goals than Messier. So what?
How that is relevant to subject? Jagr scored more goals than Messier. So what?
How that is relevant to subject? Jagr scored more goals than Messier. So what?
The point is whatever nonsensical and poorly explained thing 94now wants it to be, guys. Come on.
Anyway, glad Henke seems to have turned it around.
sorry, what is the subject?
The subject was why Hank sucked for so long. His accomplishments that no one questions have nothing to add to the conversation.
My points were as follows:
1. Lundqvist has always been able to elevate his game above his average by putting a lot of effort into the process only he knows.
2. He intentionally reserved that "elevation" for February, assuming he would play his average at season onset.
3. instead of playing his average in Oct through Dec he played way below it.
4. If there were no Olympics he might have reconfigured his scheme. And that would have allowed the Rangers to enjoy somewhat better results at this point of their season.
You have no evidence for that claim. I can similarly make a claim with no evidence to refute what you just said, by saying that Henrik struggled early in the season because he was getting used to fatherhood and taking care of his infant daughter. Now that things have settled down at home, he's able to be a bit more relaxed and focused at work.
The subject was why Hank sucked for so long. His accomplishments that no one questions have nothing to add to the conversation.
My points were as follows:
1. Lundqvist has always been able to elevate his game above his average by putting a lot of effort into the process only he knows.
2. He intentionally reserved that "elevation" for February, assuming he would play his average at season onset.
3. instead of playing his average in Oct through Dec he played way below it.
4. If there were no Olympics he might have reconfigured his scheme. And that would have allowed the Rangers to enjoy somewhat better results at this point of their season.
This is not a New York Times, but a message board. For those looking for factual material I'd suggest nhl.com
You speculation might be true, I wouldn't argue it other than saying that quiet fatherhood could be purchased easily. 24hour nurse is something Hank could afford.
Being-at-his-best comes at huge cost to any pro athlete. Just think about what baseball players used to do, they harmed their health for it!Did he 'intentionally' withhold his best knowingly? .
But you can't expect to claim that the reason Henrik is struggling is because he intentionally took it easy until Olympics time, present that idea as fact, and expect to be taken seriously.
The subject was why Hank sucked for so long. His accomplishments that no one questions have nothing to add to the conversation.
My points were as follows:
1. Lundqvist has always been able to elevate his game above his average by putting a lot of effort into the process only he knows.
2. He intentionally reserved that "elevation" for February, assuming he would play his average at season onset.
3. instead of playing his average in Oct through Dec he played way below it.
4. If there were no Olympics he might have reconfigured his scheme. And that would have allowed the Rangers to enjoy somewhat better results at this point of their season.
How that is relevant to subject? Jagr scored more goals than Messier. So what?
Can we close this thread now? It's ****ing ridiculous.