Hartnell/Foligno are tweener 1st line players... The team is no longer a four line score by committee team... if the first line wings could be upgraded putting Hartnell and Foligno on the second line the offensive scoring might improve.. Dubi and Anisomov being injured doesn't help but I'm not so sure how much they would improve the overall scoring with the bottom lines not producing as they did last season...
I guess I don't think the top two lines are adequate to carry the load of the current team makeup even if healthy, I may be wrong, just my thoughts..
GOOD G-DDAMN ****ING HELL. When the everloving nippletwisting **** are we going to FINALLY dump this outdated idea of arbitrary hierarchical caste "lines" and figure out that
it's chemistry between individual players that matters?
Foligno's been near-PPG or above PPG playing with Johansen. This is a GOOD THING. DO NOT **** WITH A GOOD THING. QUIT TRYING TO REMOVE HIM FROM THERE G-DDAMNIT, YOU WILL ONLY MAKE US A WORSE TEAM. Just because he can do it doesn't mean you can suddenly throw in someone with More "Talent" (whatever the **** that's supposed to be in this context) and somehow get Better Results. People don't work that way, damnit!
EDIT: *deeeeep breath* Not that I'm opposed to occasional experimentation to see if someone
can do better. But as the rant above clearly indicates, I'm just so damn tired of folks trying to break up working combos because "he's not a Nth liner" or similar arbitrary "you're marrying above your caste" bull.
EDIT 2: *deeper breath*
I should be clear. The whole "he's normally a Nth liner" thing is not, inherently, what I find objectionable. That actually does serve as a useful mnemonic for vague player evaluation in generic, all-else-is-equal situations, so it's a useful tool in that sense. What I find maddening is when it gets used to justify player shuffles when something non-generic and helpful and constructive is going on. When we're talking about having Gibbons on the "second line", then saying "he's normally a fourth-liner" is supposed to be a way of understanding why he's not putting up points. When we've got Foligno scoring a point per game on our "first line", pointing out that "he's normally a second-liner" is a way of saying "dude, he's got awesome chemistry with Johansen." It's
not a problem when that happens, and treating it like a problem that needs solving is silly.
That's what I was trying to convey.
* * *
Whether they are playing as third or fourth liners, they are not scoring AT ALL. I don't care about Gibbons' checking, if it does not go in the net and if it does not go in the net, it does not count in the score. DMAC and Comeau checked like crazy AND THEY ALSO SCORED GOALS.
i don't know if you think denying the obvious makes you clever .... But it does not. Last year our fourth line contributed something like 27 goals and almost fifty assists. This year ...........
Last year we had scoring by committee with every one chipping in. This year other than Joey, Nick and Cam, no one is chipping in.
Today we will learn about something called "matchups". It involves what players you're playing against on the other team, and what capabilities and accomplishments can be expected of you as a result.