Coffees
blackhawk down
How so? Flyers fans are tough, id bet good majority of them won’t be bothered by what I said, Sabre head.What an oddly worded and slightly condescending thread...
How so? Flyers fans are tough, id bet good majority of them won’t be bothered by what I said, Sabre head.What an oddly worded and slightly condescending thread...
Surprised Anaheim would be interested in TK as they are rebuilding too but i’d do:I’d be curious as a ducks fan….
Zegras carlsson Konecny
Killorn mctavish terry
Vatrano Lundy strome
Would be a pretty good top 9.
I’d do a protected 1st + any forward prospect not named carlsson +
This is the type of content I make threads for.
Thanks for the thoughtful reply , it makes sense to me.
The only reason I even made that Flyers fan comment in my post, was because usually what happens in my encounters is fans making nonsense , no context whatsoever replies saying the player isn’t available when it makes zero sense from an outside fan perspective.
And I get it for teams that are competing, but teams that are retooling or rebuilding need to at least be open to converse.
Cheers
I don’t mind the premise, tho I think gaucher is a player pv personally picked and may rather move lundestrom or groulx over gaucher.Surprised Anaheim would be interested in TK as they are rebuilding too but i’d do:
TK for 1st top 10 protected 24 (but no protection in 25) Gaucher and Pastujov.
Out of curiosity, if Briere didn't do the "dumb thing" and sign guys like Staal, Hathaway and Poehling, who would take those roster spots? It sounds like their young talent isn't quite ready, so he signed a couple of mediocre band-aids to fill out the active roster for a year or two while he builds his team.
"You did what i told you not to do!" boohoo. Just because you're starting a thread doesn't mean you get to dictate how anyone responds. Frankly by your second post you sounded like a xapmat pearl...How so? Flyers fans are tough, id bet good majority of them won’t be bothered by what I said, Sabre head.
Okay fair enough. But I can assure you my intent was pure!"You did what i told you not to do!" boohoo. Just because you're starting a thread doesn't mean you get to dictate how anyone responds. Frankly by your second post you sounded like a xapmat pearl...
...hope you like words!
You're reading me wrong. They have guys who are ready to play. They don't have gamebreakers or elite talents in hand (Michkov is locked away) or anyone who really projects to be a 1D—that's the "not ready" to start thinking about post-rebuild life. But they have a handful of NHL-ready young guys who likely project to play in the top half of the lineup, and right now only 1 F and 1 D are getting the opportunity per game.
Foerster was a first round pick who had 7 points in his 8 NHL games last season. Brink led the NCAA in scoring 2 years ago. Andrae was one of the best defensemen in the SHL last season. Zamula's got the makings of a good 3rd-pairing guy, but at this point he's 23 with 3 AHL seasons under his belt because, you know, guys like Nick Seeler and Keith Yandle and now Marc Staal just had to be in the lineup every night.
Staal was signed for VETERAN MENTORSHIP (and bad performance) because Walker, Sanheim, Seeler, and Risto (lol) weren't enough VETERANS for them I guess. Andrae and Zamula are more than ready to play 3rd pairing (or higher) minutes on a bad team. Right now they have so many trash veteran defensemen that they have room for 1 or 0 prospects in the lineup any given night.
On offense, it's the same look. Deslauriers (who was signed the prior summer) is garbage and barely an NHL player. Hathaway is fine, but they have too many NHL RWs, haven't traded anyone to move the younger ones up the depth chart, and cut off the last roster spot for one by signing a guy they didn't need. Brink and Foerster are both NHL ready right now—but are RWs.
Really, they could be using Atkinson (who looks cooked) and Laughton on the "4th line" with some PK specialization, then leaving Deslauriers and/or Hathaway in the press box, which would let Foerster AND Brink get into the top 9 and play real minutes. Instead, they're cycling one-in, one-out. They've avoidably created a situation where they're not looking at "First line minutes in the AHL are better than 4th line minutes in the NHL!" They're looking at "NHL or press box" for these youngsters.
They're in a "rebuild" but have backed themselves into a situation where they are only playing 1 or 2 prospects at maximum, because god forbid they not have a 4th line entirely of TUFF AGITATORS up front and MOAR VETERANS on defense. These kids should be playing, not watching f***ing Marc Staal and Nic Deslauriers from the press box. That's the dumb shit.
I appreciate the detailed response, but it sounds like your reasoning is essentially that you want all of the NHL ready youngsters in the NHL lineup. And, as a fan, I fully understand that viewpoint.
But, I also know that there's a difference between being ready for a shot at the NHL, and actually being ready for the NHL, and it sounds like most of the Flyers youth is only ready for a shot. So, I also fully understand why Briere decided to sign a couple of mediocre bandaids to occupy those roster spots until guys show they are actually ready. Why rush the kids into full time roles, which carries a risk of hurting their long term development?
Also, of these youngsters, only Zamula isn't waivers exempt, so they can easily send the others down to the AHL to get playing time if they don't show something more over the first 8-10 games of the NHL season.
This is ongoing and though Briere is new, he's continued a frustrating pattern.
They do not develop players effectively or efficiently at either the AHL or NHL level, for a number of reasons. The Phantoms are coached by Ian Lapperriere—another played-out journeyman plug from decades past who played one season for the Flyers and earned their forever fealty by blocking a shot with his face, ending his career but fast-tracking him into the front office.
Lapperiere is...not a good coach. Meanwhile, the coaching turnover at the NHL level has jumbled that program even more, with the AHL team switching systems back and forth based on the NHL coach's desires. None of the guys in the AHL seem to improve season-over-season, and each new head coach the Flyers bring in has to do their "skeptical, hard look" at the young guys. So all their clocks keep restarting as they get older, with each new coach deferring to His Guys.
Morgan Frost is the purest example of this. Highly-skilled C, tore up juniors, decent two-way game, first rounder, made his NHL debut early in the 2019-20 season. He scored a couple goals immediately and went dry for a while and went back to the AHL. Didn't get a second sniff under Vigneault: They brought in more plugs (Derek Grant and Nate Thompson) and off they went.
Then AV gets fired and Frost has to go out there and prove to Mike Yeo that he can do whatever awesome hockey things Mike Yeo wants.
Then last year, he finally got sustained playing time with decent linemates last season—and had a great year! But last night he was a healthy scratch in the home opener, because John Tortorella still says he "doesn't know if he can trust him yet" to do whatever it is that John Tortorella wants him to do. He's 24 years old and he led the team in ES scoring last season.
It isn't a team of all kids I want: It's a team that actually commits to developing NHL players without stagnating them permanently or ruining their confidence. So, if there is no expectation to compete for a Cup right now, and the eye is to the future, they should be willing to play more than 2 rookies at any given time. They also need to let those rookies and other youngsters work through scoring droughts if they're doing everything else right.
The AHL development problem is something that Briere has acknowledged, by the way. The team hired about 5 additional skills and development coaches (mostly ex-Flyers and/or Dany Heatley) this summer and Briere mentioned in interviews that that was done because the organization didn't do it very well in the past. At the NHL level, though, they're still addicted to dinosaur coaches who default to playing journeyman scrubs rather than participating in player development.
I would ask for 1st, luneau, fwd prospectI don’t mind the premise, tho I think gaucher is a player pv personally picked and may rather move lundestrom or groulx over gaucher.
Got drysdale and zegras signed cheaper and get rid of silf and Henrique this deadline. I think it’s pretty much time to push…. Well also have plenty of money to resign Konecny, I think he’d do really well in Cronin system
Something around Konechny and Laughton with retention for Laf, Kakko and Goodrow makes way to much sense
That seems within fairI would ask for 1st, luneau, fwd prospect
Yuck. He’d look fantastic in the Tampa blue thoughI doubt any Rangers fans would want that. And I doubt many flyers fans would want TK in the ranger blue.
Thing is TB has no 1st next 2 drafts and next to 0 decent prospect to offer.Yuck. He’d look fantastic in the Tampa blue though
Pesce + B prospect + conditional Canes first if he signs an extension or not
Yikes. You running the Canes humorous social medias? Talk about lowballing.Pesce + B prospect + conditional Canes first if he signs an extension or not
It would not take Carlsson, and I don’t know which guy it would be, but I would bet you wouldn’t like it since there would be high draft capital included.I’d be curious as a ducks fan….
Zegras carlsson Konecny
Killorn mctavish terry
Vatrano Lundy strome
Would be a pretty good top 9.
I’d do a protected 1st + any forward prospect not named carlsson +
We’ll gladly trade anyone. We just don’t trust that they are serious about rebuilding, until they do something like trade Konecny, or someone who John Tortorella didn’t fully commit to making sure they were miserableHow so? Flyers fans are tough, id bet good majority of them won’t be bothered by what I said, Sabre head.
As much as I would loathe to give up Chibrikov, Konecny is an impactful piece that would strengthen the Jets.I’d do it.
We also have young LW and D if that would be preferred instead of Chibrikov