Over the volcano
Registered User
So many spoiled takes.
No one is owed anything in this world.
That core brought the Cup to Boston
.
No one is owed anything in this world.
That core brought the Cup to Boston
.
So many spoiled takes.
No one is owed anything in this world.
That core brought the Cup to Boston.
Not everything has been roses. Not by a long shot.So many spoiled takes.
No one is owed anything in this world.
That core brought the Cup to Boston
.
Once. One Cup. 12 years ago. Chicago got 3, Pittsburgh 2 (or 3), TB 2. Hell, even LA got two. Sorry if wanting to be more than "one and done" makes us "spoiled".So many spoiled takes.
No one is owed anything in this world.
That core brought the Cup to Boston
.
Now that it’s over, I’ve made peace with the fact that they only won the one Cup.
I’ve been among the most critical of this organization, including management and the core pieces.
It’s hard to say a team ever should win the Cup, so I’ll refrain from saying they should have won 2 or 3 Cups.
I will say they could have won multiple Cups. It was there to be had, but they came up short.
I have my poster of Tim Thomas Conn Smythe down in the basement.
The fact that that’s the only Cup they’ve won in my lifetime makes that season, and that particular group of players, a bit more special.
To put an overall letter grade on the thing? B+
Very very good.
Not great. Not an all time team.
Apology accepted.Once. One Cup. 12 years ago. Chicago got 3, Pittsburgh 2 (or 3), TB 2. Hell, even LA got two. Sorry if wanting to be more than "one and done" makes us "spoiled".
Yup, they unfortunately are in last place for the past 15ish years to all the teams comparable.Absolutely nothing beats 2011.
Could go 82-0, but it still wouldn't compare to seeing that happen.
A fun ride, but overall, a feeling of they could have gotten one or two, but couldn't get it done.
Some of my favorite sports times during Bergeron's time, and honestly, may just feel like I'm missing something knowing he's done.
A lot of whatifs, while not full blown regrets, winning was great, but the almosts will be forgotten with time.
Not sure what you mean here.Yup, they unfortunately are in last place for the past 15ish years to all the teams comparable.
Ya thats a pretty vague half asleep post, my bad. I meant last place in terms of cups in the last 15ish years compared to the other high end teams of the Era. Pittsburgh/Chicago/TB/LA. all got 2(Pittsburgh 3) (chicago 3)and the Bruins got 1.Not sure what you mean here.
They bullied the Bruins. I have no issue with that.
Kopitar for LA.I’d be curious to see someone historically versed in hockey to post similarly talented cores and their overall body of work results
Something tells me there have been a lot of great 5-6 guys on teams that never won or only won once.
The cores off the top of my head that were great enough to win multiple times are;
Crosby - Malkin - Letang et al
Lemieux - Jagr et al
Yzerman - Federov et al
Kucherov - Stamkos et al
Kane - Toews - Keith et al
LA I can’t even name that core beyond Brown Quick and Doughty but are they even seen as in the same echelon as the above? They had a lot of bad years surrounding the good ones. Bruins take care of the blues like they should have and they aren’t mentioned below LA that’s for sure
Who else? Devils? Avalanche? I didn’t bother with 80’s and before since it was such a different era that lacked the same parity, especially as the 2000’s