wintersej
Registered User
Bruins would massively lose any trade. Don’t think it’s really on the table.
Lol how long did it take you to convince yourself this wasn't completely one sidedWe'll offer you Gibson, take it or leave it.
Jokes aside, I am still fairly certain Gibson could become a bonafide number 1 goalie again in a different market and with an actually capable defense in front of him.
Maybe something around Gibson @30% retained plus a B-level prospect like Sidorov could be considered fair value.
Boston gets a proven goalie with a somewhat high probability of bouncing back and rejuvenating his career as well as a prospect that pots goals en masse in juniors but is completely unproven amongst men.
Anaheim gets a great goalie, who can easily mentor Dostal to take over in a few years and some redemption for the lopsided mess that was the Lindholm deal.
Skinner(stuart) + Nurse (some retention) + 1st or 2nd round pick 26/27
Boston would probably rather pay Swayman 10 mill than take on Nurse, unless that "some retention" is 50%Skinner(stuart) + Nurse (some retention) + 1st or 2nd round pick 26/27
AFPAnalytics which have been close on most contracts had his value @ 5 years x 6.4m
They used hellebyuk shesterkin and demko contracts as comparables.
Funny enough, both Ryder and Halak were good Bruins.Ryder, Halak, and a 2nd, that’s IT!
Those 2 had good long-term NHL careers and who knows what a 2nd could bring? Overpay!!!Ryder, Halak, and a 2nd, that’s IT!
If a team acquires a player without knowing what the contract will be, they leave themselves vulnerable.
If you pay assets for a player and then don't sign him, that's like buying hot air. If the player then uses this leverage, there's a risk. The player alone does not determine value. It's the combination of player and contract that does.
But yeah, reading your message, I can see it from your angle. If a player like Suzuki (or even Montembault really) haggled for a contract, I most certainly wouldn't give him away as a RFA for free.
I just don't think it would be very wise for a team to acquire them. It usually ends up with a bad contract and a player that has negative (or neutral) value.
I'd certainly be on board if Hughes inquired about Swayman and asked the Bruins permission for contract discussions before the trade. But then, why not just make a contract offer at the RFA for what you think is fair value, see if he likes it? Then the Bruins can either match, or take the compensation, or discuss a different trade with the other team. Seems more simple to me than trading for a mystery contract.
No they don't ! lolHabs offer Montembeault, 2025 1st - Calgary's, and a 2025 2nd - Pittsburgh's..OR B-level winger like Mesar or Luke Tuch.
.... that Hughes would never offer ! That completes the sentence , lol .That would be something.
Zero interest in Kane.Swayman on the Oilers would be filthy... what about Stuart Skinner, Evander Kane, and significant futures?
Almost as if you could find 2 different opinions from people that cheer for the same hockey team right?LMAO
Hab fans. Savard is worth a 1st.
also Habs fans, Swayman is worth nothing and potentially negative value if signed. Unreal.
Pulling 11.5 out your backside and adding etc like it could go higher is laughable.
If, I have 10+M and need a player. Marner isn't it.Swayman for Marner straight up. Marner with Pastrnak on the same line would be lethal.
Kane is done.Zero interest in Kane.
Kane is done.Zero interest in Kane.