From what i gather from the bright minds here is that weak playoff teams lose series, especially against teams that you don’t want to see win or give credit to
I definitely think the Sens have the highest floor out of the Buffalo, Detroit, Montreal, and Ottawa quartet. But Montreal has by far the highest ceiling.
Wouldn't that be considered weak? Slow forwards, don't have scoring...sounds weak to meI don’t think LA is weak. They just don’t match up well with EDM. The blueline and checking Fs are too slow, and they don’t have enough scoring.
Leaf-love? That'd be a first.In the last 6 playoff seasons the Habs have played in 7 series and have a 4-3 record. In the last 6 playoff seasons the Leafs have played in 8 series and have a 2-6 record.
Lots of Leaf-love and Hab-hate in this discussion.
There's no imperfection with seeding by points. You play to win games.Wasn't being rhetorical. Was a bit tongue in cheek but it goes more towards the imperfections of the seeding system based on points.
That's what I was getting at- in a meandering sort of way.There's no imperfection with seeding by points. You play to win games.
But you can look at things other than standings points to judge the underlying strength of teams.
Someone didn't bother reading the original post.Come PO time, the teams outside the PO are weak. Stupid question answered
You know that more than one thing can be true at the same time right? The Oilers are far better and a legit contender, and the Kings are a weak playoff team. One being true doesn’t invalidate the other.The Kings were not a weak team, and anybody that argues so is foolish.
The Kings simply encountered a BETTER team. The same BETTER team many years in a row.
As far as what determines a 'weak' playoff team, it's generally a team that does not control play at 5v5, does not outscore their opposition at 5v5, and over-relies on goaltending, hot shooting percentage, or their powerplay.
Teams that put up red flags this season were Washington, Winnipeg, Toronto.
Teams that made the playoffs, but everybody kind knew they were cooked include Montreal, Ottawa and Minnestoa.
I'd argue the teams in those two groups could be considered 'weak'.
I'm not a Kings fanOne guy calls your team weak and you make a passive aggressive main board thread?
That's WEAK
Is that the series Mick Vukota attacked Jeff Bloemberg or was that '90?Wanna see a real weak playoff team? Go back and watch the Rangers/Islanders in 94. Islanders were absolutely destroyed in every game.
You know that more than one thing can be true at the same time right? The Oilers are far better and a legit contender, and the Kings are a weak playoff team. One being true doesn’t invalidate the other.
Kings are a worse version of the current Hurricanes that are rightfully being clowned for their high-floor, low-ceiling safe roster.
Re: on fly adjustmentsA coaching staff that can make in-game adjustments on the fly have a huge advantage in the playoffs compared to those who stick rigidly to the systems that found them regular season success.
Vancouver is weak, ya know the one out of the playoffs.Wouldn't that be considered weak? Slow forwards, don't have scoring...sounds weak to me
..."and if you don't have that a weak team?"You need to be able to roll 4 lines and forecheck in the playoffs. Big heavy...grit and sandpaper with secondary scoring with someone reliable in net. You better have puck moving Dmen as well as a some shutdown guys that can be trusted out there.
JMHO
Yes Vancouver is weak. I agree with youVancouver is weak, ya know the one out of the playoffs.
That is where it gets intriguing for me.4 shots in 3 straight 3rd periods on your way to getting not only eliminated but a gentlemans sweep...hard argue Dallas isn't a weak PO team
Playoffs are a different rule book and play style. Success in the regular season doesn't usually carry over to the playoffs. Strong playoff teams aren't always on top of the regular season schedule.That is where it gets intriguing for me.
Weak as current PO performance vs. performance over the entire season.