aleshemsky83
Registered User
- Apr 8, 2008
- 17,909
- 463
Oilers will have to keep most of their cap hits to trade them, not interested , I'd rather buy them out
If the Flyers can dump the Carter and Richards contracts I don't see why Horcoff can't be moved. Don't forget the Canadiens took on Gomez's contract a couple years ago and his is even worse.
And when Richards/Carter start to not be worth their contracts they will be bought out/retire, and that is still many years away.
And when Gomez went to Montreal he was still 60 point/season center. Horcoff has 46 points in his last 122 games, about a 30 point/season pace so yeah Gomez was significantly better when he was traded. And when Gomez started reaching Horcoff levels of suck he was bought out.
Furthermore MacT has publicly stated that Horcoff should move on. That tends to lower any asking price when the GM is actively admitting they don't want the player around next year.
It seems nobody has focused on this. To be succinct many of MacT's comments since taking management have been blatantly stupid and devaluing players that are presumably on the trading block.
I mean why say that about a player you want to deal? Makes zero sense.
I think Horcoff ends up in Detroit and Hemsky ends up in Carolina or Boston.
I do think Edmonton could avoid going the buy-out route here in both cases. I guess we'll wait and see.
I do not understand why MacT would discuss on the air about moving their Oiler veterans such as their captain and assist. capt so nonchalantly. Sure the team played poorly this year and the two aforementioned vets' plays were not up to par but I believe they should have been discussed behind closed doors. By now, they should have earned some level of respect and professionalism given all their time here. The team does need veteran leadership going into the future. I would hang on to Horcoff as a third line centre. Buying him off would show the young guns about Oilers management has selective loyalty and only Smyth will be the chosen one to stay. After all, we do need a centre given our frequent injuries at that position and Horc is virtually untradeable with his contract and age. Let's not make this a 3 ring circus, a little professionalism is needed. MacT maybe the polar opposite of Tambo when it comes to revealing press conferences. Well that is my 2 cents worth...
It seems nobody has focused on this. To be succinct many of MacT's comments since taking management have been blatantly stupid and devaluing players that are presumably on the trading block.
I mean why say that about a player you want to deal? Makes zero sense.
It seems nobody has focused on this. To be succinct many of MacT's comments since taking management have been blatantly stupid and devaluing players that are presumably on the trading block.
I mean why say that about a player you want to deal? Makes zero sense.
Yes, because their values were sky high before the comments
If a GM didn't know these players were available for scraps then he is worse than Tambo. Hemsky might fetch a 2nd rder. If the Oil ask for more than that, I'm sure the team inquiring would settle for Havlat, whom the Sharks would cough up for a late 2nd/3rd. Horcoff has a limited NTC and can list 10 teams, all while having one of the worst cap hits in the league for what he brings.
This isn't a Ferrari that has an engine with a slight miss that MacT disclosed while putting it on the market, this is a Kia held together with duct tape.
Buy out window ends June 30.
Horcs no move clause ends July 1.
Horcs 10 team list will be submitted June 30 midnight.
Horc isn't being bought out, nor is Hemsky. You guys know how often we look at other teams players thinking oooh he could work despite sucking on his current team? Other teams do the same.
If Horc was a free agent he would get 2-2.5 Million at least, as the free agent crop is non existant. He would have a number of suiters at that price I'd suspect.
So if we can retain some salary or cap and give him at that price we'll get something, maybe minor, maybe a bad contract, but we'll get something.
Same with Hemmer.