Well I mean... there were only 9 players in the entire league last year with 100 plus points.
There's only been a handful of Redwings in the last 25-30 years with 90 plus points in a season. Idk if it's right to say it's "impossible" for Raymond to get there but odds suggest it's a steep climb.
Not sure anyone that questions 100 points plus is saying Raymonds a bad player. Just idk if he's with names like Pastrnak/Panarin/Rantanen etc. some of the best non-centers in the league... idk Seems like a guy that'll get somewhere between 30-40 goals consistently and have a few breakthrough years and TO ME that's really good still.
I'm not sure I'd put Tkachuk in that category, though, either. It feels like the lack of team success has made some of our guys undervalued compared to some other guys.
Tkachuck has had two more than anyone on the Wings have had in how long?
Him and Barkov and much better players than anyone on the Wings so they really don’t work as a comparable
we weren't talking about the rest of the team, though. Part of what makes Barkov and Tkachuk (and a host of other players) look so good is that they have good teams around them, and that's what I think we're waiting on to see what Danielson, Kaspar, Ed, Cossa, etc. actually end up being. i really don't think Larkin and Raymond are crazy far off from Eichel/Stone or Barkov/Tkachuk.