A few thousand for sure. Obviously I don’t make any bets without knowing the potential return. But if it was 50/50 payout, I’d bet a lot.Just curious.
How much money would you be willing to bet on us making the playoffs?
Just to gauge how sure you are of this.
* as long as all three teams behind them get points.Man, there's a lot of overconfidence here for a team that is literally one loss away from being out of the playoffs again.
With the loser point, that isn't a huge stretch.* as long as all three teams behind them get points.
I thought after last night's game this thread deserved a bump.
On pace for 31 goals and 79 points. Way better than anyone could have hoped for at the time of the trade.
But it's not just the points: 19 minutes of ice time and a plus-two rating along with two key penalty-killing shifts late in the second period and midway through the third, three blocked shots and a 73-per-cent success rate in the face-off circle.
He's such a good all round player. The kind of leadership that the young guys really need to fully develop their games.
Have you not check in the tank thread?I just want to know whether those who were against the trade due to "timing" would still be arguing "timing" if the Canucks win the division.
My prediction was Miller would def hit 50 maybe close to 60 in a permanent top 6 role.I thought after last night's game this thread deserved a bump.
On pace for 31 goals and 79 points. Way better than anyone could have hoped for at the time of the trade.
But it's not just the points: 19 minutes of ice time and a plus-two rating along with two key penalty-killing shifts late in the second period and midway through the third, three blocked shots and a 73-per-cent success rate in the face-off circle.
He's such a good all round player. The kind of leadership that the young guys really need to fully develop their games.
Agreed Billy, you areMy prediction was Miller would def hit 50 maybe close to 60 in a permanent top 6 role.
I was so naive
I could *never* understand the talk that Miller was a good middle six forward.
Man, there's a lot of overconfidence here for a team that is literally one loss away from being out of the playoffs again.
It’s the agenda on this board by a group of pplI could *never* understand the talk that Miller was a good middle six forward.
At the time of the trade, his totals for his previous 4 seasons were 43, 56, 58, and 48, with 20 goals in each of the first 3, and his final year in Tampa was widely considered a down year due to being moved up and down the lineup.
At the very least, Miller was a legit top-six forward when the Canucks traded for him, yet for some reason, people refused to call him that.
Wrong, with one loss, we are still in the top three. try again.Man, there's a lot of overconfidence here for a team that is literally one loss away from being out of the playoffs again.
Canucks have had a record of piss-poor pro-scouting. Plus, Miller was coming off a down year.It’s the agenda on this board by a group of ppl
Canucks have had a record of piss-poor pro-scouting. Plus, Miller was coming off a down year.
You're telling me there wasn't a reason to be skeptical?
Man this the most frustrating narrative of all on hockey buzz. There is no way you actually believe that benning didn’t try to negotiate. You are smart guy and surely you know this isn’t true. So why write this comment? It’s incredibly disingenuous . Benning himself said TA was asking for more and this is what they settled on.Coupled with the fact that the Canucks have finished in the bottom 10 in the league for the last four seasons, and the rumour that Benning didn't try to negotiate the offer at all (in isolation this seems unlikely, but a similar report came out about the McCann + 33rd overall for Gudbranson trade).
But facts and logical reasoning don't matter. It's all hindsight arguments that will prevail, which miss the point of judging the trade at the time it happened.
Man this the most frustrating narrative of all on hockey buzz. There is no way you actually believe that benning didn’t try to negotiate. You are smart guy and surely you know this isn’t true. So why write this comment? Benning himself said TA was asking for more and this is what they settled on.
Coupled with the fact that the Canucks have finished in the bottom 10 in the league for the last four seasons, and the rumour that Benning didn't try to negotiate the offer at all (in isolation this seems unlikely, but a similar report came out about the McCann + 33rd overall for Gudbranson trade).
But facts and logical reasoning don't matter. It's all hindsight arguments that will prevail, which miss the point of judging the trade at the time it happened.