Player Discussion What do we have in J.T. Miller? | Part 2

DonnyNucker

Registered User
Mar 28, 2017
4,002
2,896
Just curious.

How much money would you be willing to bet on us making the playoffs?
Just to gauge how sure you are of this.
A few thousand for sure. Obviously I don’t make any bets without knowing the potential return. But if it was 50/50 payout, I’d bet a lot.
 

BWJM

Registered User
Sponsor
Mar 16, 2011
2,721
3,067
Here’s to hoping Miller loves Vancouver and takes a team friendly deal in a few years to keep the ball rolling.
 

WetcoastOrca

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jun 3, 2011
39,950
25,606
Vancouver, BC
I thought after last night's game this thread deserved a bump.
On pace for 31 goals and 79 points. Way better than anyone could have hoped for at the time of the trade.
But it's not just the points: 19 minutes of ice time and a plus-two rating along with two key penalty-killing shifts late in the second period and midway through the third, three blocked shots and a 73-per-cent success rate in the face-off circle.
He's such a good all round player. The kind of leadership that the young guys really need to fully develop their games.
 

Jay Cee

P4G
May 8, 2007
6,155
1,234
Halifax
I thought after last night's game this thread deserved a bump.
On pace for 31 goals and 79 points. Way better than anyone could have hoped for at the time of the trade.
But it's not just the points: 19 minutes of ice time and a plus-two rating along with two key penalty-killing shifts late in the second period and midway through the third, three blocked shots and a 73-per-cent success rate in the face-off circle.
He's such a good all round player. The kind of leadership that the young guys really need to fully develop their games.

Exceptttt for Jim Benning and John Weisbrod. Amirite?
 

Grantham

Registered User
Mar 28, 2017
1,408
1,492
This was either going to be a stupid buffoon level trade, or gutsy, and fortunately for the us, it has turned out on the gutsy and rewarding side. Gotta give credit where credit is due even though I’m not a big fan of the management overall.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ginger Papa

F A N

Registered User
Aug 12, 2005
19,489
6,378
I just want to know whether those who were against the trade due to "timing" would still be arguing "timing" if the Canucks win the division.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WetcoastOrca

Billy Kvcmu

Registered User
Dec 5, 2014
28,396
17,196
West Vancouver
I thought after last night's game this thread deserved a bump.
On pace for 31 goals and 79 points. Way better than anyone could have hoped for at the time of the trade.
But it's not just the points: 19 minutes of ice time and a plus-two rating along with two key penalty-killing shifts late in the second period and midway through the third, three blocked shots and a 73-per-cent success rate in the face-off circle.
He's such a good all round player. The kind of leadership that the young guys really need to fully develop their games.
My prediction was Miller would def hit 50 maybe close to 60 in a permanent top 6 role.

I was so naive
 

Billy Kvcmu

Registered User
Dec 5, 2014
28,396
17,196
West Vancouver
I’m pretty sure he’s among the top of the league at faceoff winning % which is stupidly insane.

also, can we just emphasize that he’s signed til 2023 with a cap hit of 5.25m????

Like...Tampa made a successful bet with signing him long term, but they aren’t benefiting from it thus far
 

Spectrefire

Registered User
Jan 3, 2013
1,243
1,319
I could *never* understand the talk that Miller was a good middle six forward.

At the time of the trade, his totals for his previous 4 seasons were 43, 56, 58, and 48, with 20 goals in each of the first 3, and his final year in Tampa was widely considered a down year due to being moved up and down the lineup.

At the very least, Miller was a legit top-six forward when the Canucks traded for him, yet for some reason, people refused to call him that.
 

Chimpradamus

Registered User
Feb 16, 2006
16,634
5,249
Northern Sweden
Man, there's a lot of overconfidence here for a team that is literally one loss away from being out of the playoffs again.
bipolar_o_1034058.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Luckylarry

Billy Kvcmu

Registered User
Dec 5, 2014
28,396
17,196
West Vancouver
I could *never* understand the talk that Miller was a good middle six forward.

At the time of the trade, his totals for his previous 4 seasons were 43, 56, 58, and 48, with 20 goals in each of the first 3, and his final year in Tampa was widely considered a down year due to being moved up and down the lineup.

At the very least, Miller was a legit top-six forward when the Canucks traded for him, yet for some reason, people refused to call him that.
It’s the agenda on this board by a group of ppl
 

Frankie Blueberries

Dream Team
Jan 27, 2016
9,414
10,992
Canucks have had a record of piss-poor pro-scouting. Plus, Miller was coming off a down year.
You're telling me there wasn't a reason to be skeptical?

Coupled with the fact that the Canucks have finished in the bottom 10 in the league for the last four seasons, and the rumour that Benning didn't try to negotiate the offer at all (in isolation this seems unlikely, but a similar report came out about the McCann + 33rd overall for Gudbranson trade).

But facts and logical reasoning don't matter. It's all hindsight arguments that will prevail, which miss the point of judging the trade at the time it happened.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rypper

DonnyNucker

Registered User
Mar 28, 2017
4,002
2,896
Coupled with the fact that the Canucks have finished in the bottom 10 in the league for the last four seasons, and the rumour that Benning didn't try to negotiate the offer at all (in isolation this seems unlikely, but a similar report came out about the McCann + 33rd overall for Gudbranson trade).

But facts and logical reasoning don't matter. It's all hindsight arguments that will prevail, which miss the point of judging the trade at the time it happened.
Man this the most frustrating narrative of all on hockey buzz. There is no way you actually believe that benning didn’t try to negotiate. You are smart guy and surely you know this isn’t true. So why write this comment? It’s incredibly disingenuous . Benning himself said TA was asking for more and this is what they settled on.

I mean a 6 year old knows how to negotiate and you think a man running a $500 million franchise doesn’t know how to or refuses to? Absurd. He may sound like an idiot on interviews but I don’t think his IQ is below 70
 

Frankie Blueberries

Dream Team
Jan 27, 2016
9,414
10,992
Man this the most frustrating narrative of all on hockey buzz. There is no way you actually believe that benning didn’t try to negotiate. You are smart guy and surely you know this isn’t true. So why write this comment? Benning himself said TA was asking for more and this is what they settled on.

It's just a rumour - like I said, normally I'd just discard it, but there are other rumours of different, similar stories as well. Either way though, it's not one of the more important factors in evaluating the trade. The team's trajectory at the time of the trade, along with Benning's track record of pro-scouting, were the main causes for concern.

It is amusing to see all these people chest thumping about how good the trade was, when they never even watched J.T. Miller before the trade occurred aside from a handful of games, and we still don't even know where the pick ends up lol.
 

WetcoastOrca

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jun 3, 2011
39,950
25,606
Vancouver, BC
Coupled with the fact that the Canucks have finished in the bottom 10 in the league for the last four seasons, and the rumour that Benning didn't try to negotiate the offer at all (in isolation this seems unlikely, but a similar report came out about the McCann + 33rd overall for Gudbranson trade).

But facts and logical reasoning don't matter. It's all hindsight arguments that will prevail, which miss the point of judging the trade at the time it happened.

Well your post including wild rumours of Benning not negotiating is certainly proof of that. The irony is quite amazing.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad