I don't necessarily care that Tua stayed in the game. Honestly, it probably improved the Bills' chances of winning if anything, because the guy was clearly concussed. But, I do care that the Dolphins' management think people, in this day and age, are this... naive. It's just insulting.
To add to everyone's already perfectly valid points, the Miami Dolphins are saying that a back injury led to his stumbling. And as far as I know, which is admittedly very little, the only thing that could really account for a temporary loss of motor control would be some kind of nerve damage.
So, what did their medical staff do to support this claim that it was a back injury? Once they found presumably nothing of real concern related to his back, hence why Tua was allowed to return to the game, how do they not revisit the original concern that Tua had sustained a concussion? Did they do their due diligence? Did they even care to, given the team's now very public pursuits of Tom Brady and Deshaun Watson?
You would think with all the cameras firmly locked in on that particular play and its end result, with all that is know about concussions and brain-related trauma, with all the class-action suits surrounding concussions and its link to CTE, with all the drama surrounding Miami's ownership group in general, you would think there would have been a radically heightened level of sensitivity towards doing the right thing in the publics' eyes.
Me personally? I don't know how you get to a place where you'd feel comfortable putting him back in there. And, I'm just a fan. I don't have any skin in the game. The NFLPA, and their lawyers very much do, and I personally believe they will not pass this opportunity up, if it helps paint NFL's leadership like a bunch of assholes. Again.
Should be interesting to say the least.