Spearmint Rhino
Registered User
- Sep 17, 2013
- 9,322
- 9,337
We will send Armia down to deliver Webers contract, Yotes can keep him tooWishful thinking.
It will definitely cost the Habs a pick or prospect.
We will send Armia down to deliver Webers contract, Yotes can keep him tooWishful thinking.
It will definitely cost the Habs a pick or prospect.
Wishful thinking.
It will definitely cost the Habs a pick or prospect.
Wishful thinking.
It will definitely cost the Habs a pick or prospect.
The benefit for Montreal is the contract spot along with more offseason flexibility. The team cannot exceed the cap by more than 10% in the offseason and during the offseason Weber’s full cap hit counts until the season starts so they can’t acquire anyone with that 8 million cap space.
Likewise a team needing to get to the cap floor can use the 8 million in cap space he uses in the offseason while only paying him 1 million.
If Price also needs to go on LTIR at 10 million then that is even more cap space they lose during the offseason.
I am sure there are other benefits I am not capturing.
Interesting note from Elliotte Friedman this evening:
What would a deal for this contract look like? Would Montreal have to add a pick? Would they demand a pick or player as compensation?
That is quite a savings to ArizonaHe was talking about over the next 4 years Webers total cap hit is 25 million more than the money Arizona will have to pay.
Interesting note from Elliotte Friedman this evening:
What would a deal for this contract look like? Would Montreal have to add a pick? Would they demand a pick or player as compensation?
Nope, Habs are helping a team out. Or they hold onto the contract. Either way, Habs don’t lose assets. No reason yo.Absolutely they would have to pay to move 4 years of 7.85M in dead cap (the only exception being Nashville).
Nope, Habs are helping a team out. Or they hold onto the contract. Either way, Habs don’t lose assets. No reason yo.
What’s in it for Habs? Weber only counts to the cap in the offseason and Habs are in rebuilding mode. They will be loading up on assets. Not giving them up while rebuilding.Not without taking a bad contract back a la Tyler Johnson for Seabrook.
High cap hit with low actual cash paid out.
Makes too much sense for Arizona. I dont see a downside for them.
I do see downside for The Habs though. If they intend to have a 2 year retool then that LTIR can be useful in 2 years.......
Habs have no need to go 7.9M above the cap in the offseason this coming season or the one after. They are rebuilding and at least 2 years from competing. By that time, Weber will retire.It's not useful to Montreal at all. Weber on LTIR allows them to go up to 7.9 mil over the cap, but he also costs 7.9 mil against the cap. There's no savings by keeping his contract. In fact, they're more likely to have less cap space by keeping him, since they almost certainly won't be able to fully maximum the LTIR potential. They also won't be able to bank cap space as long as they are using LTIR.
LTIR FAQ - CapFriendly - NHL Salary Caps
Habs have no need to go 7.9M above the cap in the offseason this coming season or the one after. They are rebuilding and at least 2 years from competing. By that time, Weber will retire.
Whether they do or not is irrelevant to the point I was making. The point is, keeping Weber doesn't benefit them in any way. It can only hurt them.
It actually could benefit them in a couple years if they are competing and fall under that strange loophole where his LTIR helps circumvent the cap. I see Weber retiring in 2 years and taking a role in player development with the Habs. He is the ultimate team captain.
Because he can make the same money in the front office, doing what he loves to do. He's owed 1M per season at the end of his contract.I wish people would explain this. Why would he retire and give away free money?
High cap hit with low actual cash paid out.
Makes too much sense for Arizona. I dont see a downside for them.
I do see downside for The Habs though. If they intend to have a 2 year retool then that LTIR can be useful in 2 years.......
Many billlionaires post on HF so for them 1m$ is chump change.I wish people would explain this. Why would he retire and give away free money?
Because he can make the same money in the front office, doing what he loves to do. He's owed 1M per season at the end of his contract.
I see Weber as a future Coach or GM in the league.