We Have A Gm Problem | Page 53 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

We Have A Gm Problem

There are times I go back and forth on KD. I like some of his picks but he has a handful of moves I didn’t like and a few that were just downright bad.

I think this year seeing who he takes at 3 and how he meets the cap floor will be telling for me and if I have confidence in him.
 
There are times I go back and forth on KD. I like some of his picks but he has a handful of moves I didn’t like and a few that were just downright bad.

I think this year seeing who he takes at 3 and how he meets the cap floor will be telling for me and if I have confidence in him.
I will say I have liked his picks. I can be objective on that. I havent liked a single FA signing outside of Teravainen, his contracts have mostly been awful, and trades have seemed weak. I am not fan of the coach either
 
I will say I have liked his picks. I can be objective on that. I havent liked a single FA signing outside of Teravainen, his contracts have mostly been awful, and trades have seemed weak. I am not fan of the coach either
Judging his UFA signings is silly. He needed to sign players to fill out a roster that was made to be among the worst in the league. You don't get your pick of the litter when your team is set up to be bad.
 
I will say I have liked his picks. I can be objective on that. I havent liked a single FA signing outside of Teravainen, his contracts have mostly been awful, and trades have seemed weak. I am not fan of the coach either
They went with the old Cubs rebuild strategy, a lot of short term deals to flip for assets, cap dumps and signings to get to the cap floor, they were intentionally awful because they need to get as many blue chip assets as possible at the top of the draft...this was their strategy going in and they've stuck to it, and should for another year or two until most of the high picks in pipeline are in the NHL...KD has mostly avoided the really bad UFA mistake, and hopefully he continues that this summer
 
There are times I go back and forth on KD. I like some of his picks but he has a handful of moves I didn’t like and a few that were just downright bad.

I think this year seeing who he takes at 3 and how he meets the cap floor will be telling for me and if I have confidence in him.
He's had some absolute home run moves - Dach for Nazar, Rinzel in the last 1st, some really good value picks like Lardis...its way way too early to judge his work, NHL prospects take a long time relative to say the NFL or NBA where they're drafted and immediately hit the active roster. His intention was in the right place with the HC job with Carle but you can't force him to leave Denver. If he had him looking at houses then KD made a hell of a pitch.
 
Last edited:
Judging his UFA signings is silly. He needed to sign players to fill out a roster that was made to be among the worst in the league. You don't get your pick of the litter when your team is set up to be bad.


Brodie getting 2 years is indefensible. He absolutely deserves to be negatively judged for that move.

The Bertuzzi contract doesn’t look great either.
 
Last edited:
I will say I have liked his picks. I can be objective on that. I havent liked a single FA signing outside of Teravainen, his contracts have mostly been awful, and trades have seemed weak. I am not fan of the coach either

Who were the players he missed out on in FA that you would have liked?? Also players need to want to come rebuilding team. usually that means you need to pay extra. Hawks have plenty cap space and actually need to hit the floor.

What trade was weak? Jones deal was homerun. Hagel deal was great. We got good picks and were able to tank better.

So you wanted coaching change and you got it. Now you complane that you dont still like the coach. So I ask you what coach was available that we missed on that would make you happy??
 
Brodie getting 2 years is indefensible.

What does it matter, he played at the start of the year when prospects were not ready. At half way he was more and more scratched. KD doesnt have crystall ball and know for sure when prospect are ready so he gave Brodie two years. The second year wont effect Hawks anyway they can buy it out or send Brodie to AHL.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cashman
Brodie getting 2 years is indefensible. He absolutely deserves to be negatively judged for that move.

The Bertuzzi contract doesn’t look great either.
Brodie was straight up awful. No getting around that but his contract won't prevent them from being able to do anything. I think the thought behind the 2nd year was that KD knew that the team had no vet Dmen on the roster going into this year other than Murphy and Jones. He probably would have rather given another year to Martinez but he probably indicated that he only had 1 year left to play.
 
Brodie getting 2 years is indefensible. He absolutely deserves to be negatively judged for that move.

The Bertuzzi contract doesn’t look great either.
Bertuzzi contract is fine, he's a 3rd line player, who scores 20G, that's what he makes.

They have needed to sign guys just to reach the floor. Who cares if they overpay bums. No one is itching to come to Chicago to not win games.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad