Mikeshane
Registered User
- Jan 15, 2013
- 6,175
- 3,924
One thing I'm glad for is that the "but Calgary" narrative is now dead.
This post has an extra chromosome.Couture got his hat-trick and he'll then disappear for the rest of the series.
Ha. I’m too fast on that edit dogg.
This post has an extra chromosome.
Now I'm like BOUT THAT BABY! The brain is the works! Y'all seen how the sharks play in these playoffs ! I mean woah, this that type of of dirty third dirt y'all know what I'm talkin bout! The sharks going all in and doing it smartz. They playing the history on these too. This is all philosofy on these. Read, Darwin I ching and Bible that that there and the sharks is moving on it. Doing thangs and moving thangs.He can't skate backwards well. His forward skating and overall mobility have improved significantly, so I'm hoping we're witnessing him becoming healthier.
He's mostly contributing with his incomparable hockey brain.
What are you trying to prove here? I said a million times here that Sharks have some fantastic snipe depth. It seems like 90% of your top 9 can just rip it. Giving you lot easy access to the slot like Mikko did on the Labanc goal and Landeskog did tonight is asking for us to lose. However, it's not like the Sharks have done anything magical to get those goals where I personally have to tip my cap. Half of the goals have come from stupid correctable mistakes. Because of that Sharks deserve to be up 2-1 in the series, but it's not because they're playing this amazing ultra brand of hockey where Avs look like an AHL team.Are you the same guy who dismissed the Labanc goal in game 1 as Rantanen's mistake gifting Labanc a goal?
Avs defencive unit is solid, team defence has always been prone at some mistakes. However, that's our best defencive player and one of the better ones in the league making a super rookie mistake.i mean, the avs don't play airtight defense. this is not news.
Do you just flat out refuse to give the Sharks any credit? Aren't you also the one that said Labancs goal was lucky?He's been pretty terrible for the last couple of games, perhaps you know more but he also seems like someone to disappear for a couple of games similar to Pasarnak. He's got an insane shot so he doesn't need a lot of chances, but I thought Avs gave you lot some easy goals again especially the GWG.
Sharks flat out dominated the game for 2 periods but yeah sureWhat are you trying to prove here? I said a million times here that Sharks have some fantastic snipe depth. It seems like 90% of your top 9 can just rip it. Giving you lot easy access to the slot like Mikko did on the Labanc goal and Landeskog did tonight is asking for us to lose. However, it's not like the Sharks have done anything magical to get those goals where I personally have to tip my cap. Half of the goals have come from stupid correctable mistakes. Because of that Sharks deserve to be up 2-1 in the series, but it's not because they're playing this amazing ultra brand of hockey where Avs look like an AHL team.
Avs defencive unit is solid, team defence has always been prone at some mistakes. However, that's our best defencive player and one of the better ones in the league making a super rookie mistake.
AHL team? Said who?What are you trying to prove here? I said a million times here that Sharks have some fantastic snipe depth. It seems like 90% of your top 9 can just rip it. Giving you lot easy access to the slot like Mikko did on the Labanc goal and Landeskog did tonight is asking for us to lose. However, it's not like the Sharks have done anything magical to get those goals where I personally have to tip my cap. Half of the goals have come from stupid correctable mistakes. Because of that Sharks deserve to be up 2-1 in the series, but it's not because they're playing this amazing ultra brand of hockey where Avs look like an AHL team.
Avs defencive unit is solid, team defence has always been prone at some mistakes. However, that's our best defencive player and one of the better ones in the league making a super rookie mistake.
So many similarities between the Sharks and last year’s Caps....hope San Jose goes all the way this year.
— Tortured fan base that’s starved for a Cup
— Dead to rights in round 1, and then life (Eller 2OT goal in G3 for WSH, 4-goal PP for SJ)
— Still winning games despite injured superstar forward (Backstrom, Pavelski)
— Winning games on the road in the playoffs
That's because Avs didn't show up. This is not the Krebs cycle we're talking about here Milhouse, cause and effect is quite easy to spot. Avs didn't show up, Sharks go up 2-0. Same thing happened in Game 2, but reserve. Don't get your panties in a knot, you're going to need them in game 4.Sharks flat out dominated the game for 2 periods but yeah sure
sorry but i don't think any avs defensemen are any of the better ones in the league.Avs defencive unit is solid, team defence has always been prone at some mistakes. However, that's our best defencive player and one of the better ones in the league making a super rookie mistake.
That's because Avs didn't show up. This is not the Krebs cycle we're talking about here Milhouse, cause and effect is quite easy to spot. Avs didn't show up, Sharks go up 2-0. Same thing happened in Game 2, but reserve. Don't get your panties in a knot, you're going to need them in game 4.
I think the Sharks are doing a much better job than Calgary of clogging the neutral zone preventing the Avs from gaining the blue line with speed.Colorado didn’t even get 30 shots on goal. In the two CGY games at Pepsi, the Avs got 108 shots on Mike Smith,
What is San Jose doing that Colorado did not?
being a decent team with 2 norris caliber defensemen and 1 that makes people talk about how the norris is never won by the best defensive dman.Colorado didn’t even get 30 shots on goal. In the two CGY games at Pepsi, the Avs got 108 shots on Mike Smith,
What is San Jose doing that Colorado did not?
sorry but i don't think any avs defensemen are any of the better ones in the league.
San Jose is doing nothing, Colorado isn't showing up to play the game on time. Avs got 108 shots at Smith is because they showed up at the start of the puck drop and not somewhere off a momentum building powerplay at a random segment in the 2nd period.Colorado didn’t even get 30 shots on goal. In the two CGY games at Pepsi, the Avs got 108 shots on Mike Smith,
What is San Jose doing that Calgary did not?
I was talking about Landeskog...sorry but i don't think any avs defensemen are any of the better ones in the league.
You are insane and I love you man.Now I'm like BOUT THAT BABY! The brain is the works! Y'all seen how the sharks play in these playoffs ! I mean woah, this that type of of dirty third dirt y'all know what I'm talkin bout! The sharks going all in and doing it smartz. They playing the history on these too. This is all philosofy on these. Read, Darwin I ching and Bible that that there and the sharks is moving on it. Doing thangs and moving thangs.
He’s a leafs fan. We claim responsibilityYou are insane and I love you man.
FYI: he is not a sharks fan
I stand corrected. Still thought the GWG was just brainless by the Avs though.
i guess. he's probably in the high 20s among defensemen for me, which means most teams have a better D.Pretty sure a lot of teams would love to have Barrie.
San Jose plays hockey, and not after the whistleColorado didn’t even get 30 shots on goal. In the two CGY games at Pepsi, the Avs got 108 shots on Mike Smith,
What is San Jose doing that Calgary did not?