Jets winning with Helly having an off game was huge. I expect the goaltending advantage to swing pretty strongly in the Jets favour as the series progresses. Avalanche are going to have to play much better if they want to have a shot.
If one looks at that chart and doesn’t think it tells a story of one team dominating the other I don’t think they understand the data enough is what I mean or have a lot of experience with stats.Shortly after the Jets 6th goal, when the score was 6-3 for the Jets, the Jets xGF% in all situations was 44.4%. In most circumstances that's not worthy of a 3 goal lead, but that's a winnable game for a team with elite goaltending. There were peaks and troughs to the game, but score effects certainly impacted the final ~13 minutes of the game.
I think that's what the other Jets fan is referring too with the score effects thing. Despite your long-winded (and good faith explanation), he does not appear to have misread the chart. The game really was close and the 3 goal lead almost certainly impacted the Avs ability to pile on xGF at the end of the game.
Do you believe in score effects at all though?If one looks at that chart and doesn’t think it tells a story of one team dominating the other I don’t think they understand the data enough is what I mean or have a lot of experience with stats.
Even when trying to look at the most beneficial window where the Jets were closest to the Avs which was also very short in duration they still had a xGF% similar to what the Blackhawks had this year.
There is no way a team could continue to get out chanced 2:1 over an entire series and come out ahead, luckily for the Jets I don’t think they will continue to give up 40 scoring chances in one game, it is so unlike them to give up so many chances against
He really killed it in the 2022 playoffs when they won the cup in spite of him.Kuemper would be killing it if he was on the Avs now.
Show me on the doll where Darcy Kuemper touched youHe really killed it in the 2022 playoffs when they won the cup in spite of him.
He's really killing it on Washington right now.
''But Washington is bad tho! You don't understand! The Avs aren't as bad as them!''
Evidently not bad enough for 30 year old mostly career AHL journeyman Charlie Lindgren.
Kuemper is just a roasted marshmallow at this point.
Show me your driver's license.Show me on the doll where Darcy Kuemper touched you
You can filter based on all scores within 1 and played at 5 on 5, the same results occur of about a 2:1 advantage for shots, chances, and expected goals throughout the game. The worst Avs player was Parise with a xGF% of 58%, everyone else was quite a bit higherDo you believe in score effects at all though?
At the moment of it being 6-3, the Jets were being outplayed, but nowhere near what the final statistics make it seem like.
Score effects definitely contributed to the Avs piling up basically 1.8xG while the Jets got 0. The Jets were up by 3 goals with ~12 minutes left, it's the definition of score effects.
Anyway, doesn't matter anymore. 1-0 Jets, new game tomorrow and I expect it to look very different in terms of style of game.
Okay that's cool to hear the other perspective on this. It felt like the Avs controlled play like crazy but made some costly mistakes. Always hard to say what's on the goalie and what's not.I wouldn’t put a whole lot of stalk into that conference. He knows he’s dealing with a goalie having a mental breakdown and he’s not one to call players out. He very well could go with George again but I’d absolutely not base the assumption on what he says in a presser.
Honestly, most Avs fans would take that defensive effort every game if they can push like that offensively. They have the horses that are perfectly suited to that style but haven’t been super consistent this year. The game they played defensively last night only becomes an issue if they can’t push the pace offensively.
The Avs gave up 16 scoring chances, 7 high danger chances, and 23 shots all game… there were some mistakes but that’s as good a recipe for success there is for a goalie.Sure, I won't disagree with that. But playing behind a team that's not interested in playing defense sure won't make anything better. You can twist it and say that if the Avs Dcore showed up the Avs would've won this game easily as well. It's a team game and Georgiev sure isn't the only one to blame for this loss.
Because good goalies cost money and there is still no guarantee they play well.This comes up every year… teams gambling on goaltending. It blows me away that you take the time to build a club and then gamble on some shaky goalie. You’d think Colorado of all places- a team that immediately won after trading for Patrick Roy - would know this.
Yes, you might be able to get by and maybe it happens this year but what a risk to take. I just don’t understand this type of gamble.
How is that different from any player?Because good goalies cost money and there is still no guarantee they play well.
Why would you wait until the trade deadline?There wasn't a clear upgrade on George this TDL - there were a bunch of goalies that may have been better, but no clearcut goalie. The only one was Saros and Nashville was on a heater.
So get someone betterAnd when Jake Allen costs a 2nd, it doesn't make sense to pay a 1st+ for a goalie that may be better than George.
0-0 going to OT and Mac sets up Adam Lowry for the winner.Lol, watch Georgiev play out of his mind next game and confuse the hell out of everyone! Hope it doesn't happen obviously, but I wouldn't be surprised at all!
Players are more predictable at every level. There's a reason why the phrase 'goalies are voodoo' is so prevalent.How is that different from any player?
Because Georgiev had a solid season prior and had a patches of solid play up until the New Year.Why would you wait until the trade deadline?
Name a goalie that was available and a clear upgrade over Georgiev.So get someone better
If you don’t want to invest in a decent goalie, you’re getting a box of chocolates. If the Avs want to risk it, cool. But it seems pretty dumb to build that great team and then have a mystery box in net.Players are more predictable at every level. There's a reason why the phrase 'goalies are voodoo' is so prevalent.
Cool. I guess there’s nothing to worry about then.Because Georgiev had a solid season prior and had a patches of solid play up until the New Year.
Boston has two, Islanders have a couple of decent ones… those are just off the top of my head.Name a goalie that was available and a clear upgrade over Georgiev.
Nashville has 2. Of course none of them would have been available. Markstrom would have been an upgrade if the idiot owner had allowed him to be traded.If you don’t want to invest in a decent goalie, you’re getting a box of chocolates. If the Avs want to risk it, cool. But it seems pretty dumb to build that great team and then have a mystery box in net.
Cool. I guess there’s nothing to worry about then.
Boston has two, Islanders have a couple of decent ones… those are just off the top of my head.
Pretty clear that none of them were actually available, at least not for non-outrageous prices considering there were 5+ teams in the goalie market and none of them were able to figure out a trade.Boston has two, Islanders have a couple of decent ones… those are just off the top of my head.
There are always trades available. But you might not want to wait until the deadline to do it.Pretty clear that none of them were actually available, at least not for non-outrageous prices considering there were 5+ teams in the goalie market and none of them were able to figure out a trade.
Matkstrom’s a solid goalie. I can’t see why he wouldn’t have been available. They dealt off other players.Nashville has 2. Of course none of them would have been available. Markstrom would have been an upgrade if the idiot owner had allowed him to be traded.