Post-Game Talk: #Warrior

3 Stars


  • Total voters
    61

80shockeywasbuns

Registered User
Feb 12, 2022
1,910
3,310
Look, I don't completely think this is crazy because if I didn't know HF existed I might be one of those people.
It’s not hard to see why when the media and even the coaches talk about hockey like it’s this battle of willpower and determination. Like would it kill an NHL coach to talk about hockey as if they actually like the sport?
 

SnowblindNYR

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Nov 16, 2011
54,547
33,834
Brooklyn, NY
It’s not hard to see why when the media and even the coaches talk about hockey like it’s this battle of willpower and determination. Like would it kill an NHL coach to talk about hockey as if they actually like the sport?

Lavi is what, like 60? He started as a hotshot babyfaced guy for the Islanders and maybe at the time he was on the cutting edge but at the end of the day he's still 60. I feel like hockey has a very lame aura about toughness that it's basically the only thing worthy of anything. And as a result there are a lot of old school people that hate analytics because they care way more about intangibles. Every other sport embraced analytics to a certain extent. But hockey is old school and they care about intangibles and hockey mythology more than trying to be the best you could be. Now, the one thing that is giving me hope is that if he was completely oblivious to analytics and looked at the game like fans do I think he would have demoted Miller a long time ago. He's not tough and he does make a lot of mistakes with the puck. It was very easy for him to put Lindgren back with Fox but he didn't (especially after the Caps game). This makes me wonder how much of this is about hockey mythology and how much of it is politics. Lindgren is obviously a well liked veteran. But I think if Lavi was a complete dinosaur Fox would be playing with Lindgren by now.

I think the problem is that teams that base their identity on toughness also win cups. But it's like everyone ignores the fact that they're tough and good and instead just focus on the toughness and it doesn't matter if the players are actually good.
 

Synergy27

F-A-C-G-C-E
Apr 27, 2004
13,809
12,827
Washington, D.C.
The only question I have right now is do we need to trade for one defenseman or two?

The xG% for the bottom four last night was downright scary. I’m not sure if just inserting Jones or adding one competent LD is gonna be enough.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mandiblesofdoom

duhmetreE

Blessed Bigly
Sponsor
Jan 18, 2012
34,433
52,256
More of the same. Where is the team from the first 6 or so games?

Only difference is Lindgren and Panarin playing at a Gretzky record breaking pace

We have a very expensive and ineffective 4th line with Kreider Mika.

Lindgren Trouba is working just as we expected. Blocked shots is almost as good as goals
 
  • Like
Reactions: KirkAlbuquerque

GoAwayPanarin

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
May 27, 2008
44,081
56,877
In High Altitoad
The only question I have right now is do we need to trade for one defenseman or two?

The xG% for the bottom four last night was downright scary. I’m not sure if just inserting Jones or adding one competent LD is gonna be enough.

Schneider Trouba was working as well as one could have hoped. There was no reason to nuke it.

Lindgren looks even worse than he did last year.
 

94leetch

Registered User
Oct 29, 2022
194
263
Thing I don't get is the Sens came in and played exactly as advertised. What was the game plan, run and gun with them ? Or did they not listen to Lav?
 

LOFIN

Registered User
Sep 16, 2011
16,620
23,541
Amid all this negativity, there is some truth to this post from the Sens board:
Ottawa was the better team tonight but this 'Rangers are frauds' narrative is complete BS. The best teams know how to squeak out points in all situations - that's exactly what separates the top of the crop from the rest of the league. Play a mediocre home game, get outshot 40-20, and come out with 2 points in the standings. That's exactly what the Sens are missing to take the next step.
 

majordomo

Registered User
Oct 29, 2023
2,108
1,715
NYC
I agree. I'm not trying to imply everything is roses with the team. I just don't buy into the sky is falling narrative when we are 7-2-1 and only a little over 10% of the way through the season. I choose to believe that if what we've seen the past 2 games actually continues long term that changes (as much as can in season) will be made. Let's not forget that this team, even the youngsters, have a lot of playoff experience already. Taking nights off, not giving 100% throughout the season is something I very much expect to happen with this bunch. That in itself you could argue is concerning, but where did the President's Trophy get us last year?

I think we have to live and die with Zib this year. So hopefully our 3rd line taking the next step takes a bunch of weight off the top 6. The defense on the other hand, needs some major surgery between now and April.
Playoff experience means crap when the same "star" players disappear in the playoffs every season. It's no coincidence that those same players have contracts that are preventing us from making the changes we really need to make.
 

80s Kid

Registered User
Feb 20, 2023
204
367
AZ
The easiest path to beat the Rangers is to stay out of the penalty box. While the Sens lost, it was a close game and they only took two minor penalties, including one that was interrupted halfway by a Kreider hooking penalty.

There are of course many other ways to win but the GWG ended up being a power play goal by Laf. The Panthers were more disciplined last season and won the cup. Vagus has consistently been one of the least penalized teams in the league and they won the cup the year before.

Until the Rangers get better at 5v5, this will continue to be their downfall because the best power play in the world means nothing if your opponent stays out of the box.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mandiblesofdoom

Maliks PlusMinus

Registered User
May 28, 2015
913
641
Glasgow, Scotland
You guys are so weird.
We are 7-2-1 and Jones isn’t even particularly good. Being stuck in your own zone in a few games is fine if you win. Honestly not sure what people want from a season. I’m delighted how we have started
 
  • Like
Reactions: Smash

hardnosed

Registered User
Feb 27, 2017
1,537
1,519
Just a random thought; Jones is better defending in our end than Mancini. Mancini plays the front of the net like a 10 year old. He's always staring at the puck while guys sneak in behind him to get wide open. Head on a swivel.........
 

Shesterkybomb

Registered User
Dec 30, 2016
16,498
17,690
The easiest path to beat the Rangers is to stay out of the penalty box. While the Sens lost, it was a close game and they only took two minor penalties, including one that was interrupted halfway by a Kreider hooking penalty.

There are of course many other ways to win but the GWG ended up being a power play goal by Laf. The Panthers were more disciplined last season and won the cup. Vagus has consistently been one of the least penalized teams in the league and they won the cup the year before.

Until the Rangers get better at 5v5, this will continue to be their downfall because the best power play in the world means nothing if your opponent stays out of the box.
The easiest way to win is to pressure our d on the forecheck, between lack of options and their first go to of rimming it up the wall the breakout is atrocious and teams can cycle us to death. Imo it seems like our forwards a lot of times are too close to their d and when they get a pass they are jammed by the d, there's no center cutting to accept a pass in the middle. One issue I notice where the Panarin line gets hemmed in sometimes is the d are reading that our wingers are on off wings and pressure them quick because they have to turn around to make a play. Imo, the breakout is killing this team, I had hoped having Housley would fix this, it hasn't.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mandiblesofdoom

80s Kid

Registered User
Feb 20, 2023
204
367
AZ
The easiest way to win is to pressure our d on the forecheck, between lack of options and their first go to of rimming it up the wall the breakout is atrocious and teams can cycle us to death. Imo it seems like our forwards a lot of times are too close to their d and when they get a pass they are jammed by the d, there's no center cutting to accept a pass in the middle. One issue I notice where the Panarin line gets hemmed in sometimes is the d are reading that our wingers are on off wings and pressure them quick because they have to turn around to make a play. Imo, the breakout is killing this team, I had hoped having Housley would fix this, it hasn't.
I agree it's a problem but in terms of simplicity, staying out if the box is about as straight forward as it gets.

I also think we're experiencing growing pains by trying to work Mancini into the lineup. I like the kid and think he's got a lot of potential but the growing pains are real. Lindgren hasn't been good but I'm sure the fishbowl isn't helping either. I just wish we could get Jones back into the lineup. He might be small but the guy knows how to move the puck.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mandiblesofdoom

TGWL

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 28, 2011
15,978
10,686
Performances like this are why fans say pay that man anything. But then you realize that this team just isn't good enough to be carried all the way and eventually if they don't improve that will only get them so far.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad