Started out uninterested with the supposed premise of "sitcoms through the decades, but superheroes" and stopped watching after the first episode. I had been hearing the whole time about how it was so much more than that and I finally got the recommend last week from a source whose taste I trust and got caught up in time for the finale today. There was a time in the middle where I really liked it, but it really fell apart for me towards the end. I just couldn't get over the fact that the good guy was holding thousands of people hostage and mind r*ping them while the bad guys never really did anything close to that bad (mostly just wanted her to stop?). It could have been more interesting if they actually acknowledged full stop that she was the bad guy, but they never really came close. It was definitely different though, which I appreciate, and maybe people who read the comics got more out of it, but I'm still disappointed with where it went.
She was not a bad guy or a good guy, she was a woman trying to cope with the death of her boyfriend. That's the entire point.
She accidentally created the world and got caught up in it.
At the end, she realizes what she has done and sacrifices her dream family for the greater good. She even ACKNOWLEDGES that she was the bad guy:
When she tells Monica that, like all of the town folks, she must hate her
But then they immediately let her off the hook by Monica saying they would never understand her sacrifice. She "sacrificed" her imaginary kids and reanimated dead husband to release thousands of people from slavery. That would already be an easy trade even without considering that SHE was the one enslaving them. You don't get a get out of jail free card for enslaving thousands because your boyfriend died.
The fan theories definitely got carried away but the people involved in the show didn’t do any favours. Why did 3 of the actors claim there were going to be some major cameos? What was the point of casting Evan Peters in that role to basically troll fans and make a silly joke ?
No.
You get a get-out-of-jail card for originally losing your boyfriend while saving the motherf***ing universe (literally). I guess that buys you a lot of leeway
And, tbh, you are better letting her go than trying to fight her... unless you have like 5 Avengers ready to be deployed
Gonna disagree completely with your first point.
The second seems totally antithetical to every movie that came before. It will be tough to take down this rogue superhero that's enslaving thousands? Better not try then. Isn't her entire story that she was radicalized by being the victim of unrestrained power? Seems weird that the conclusion to her story is that unrestrained power being used for evil shouldn't be punished.
The second point was a joke. Sorry if that was not clear. I tend not to overthink these movies/series and take them at face value
I do not expect them to have Shakespeare quality writing.
I agree. My problem with it was that this is what I saw on the face if it, and couldn't get passed it. I would be willing to overlook it if they presented a sensible counter narrative, but I just don't see a scenario here where Wanda is the good guy.
I agree. My problem with it was that this is what I saw on the face if it, and couldn't get passed it. I would be willing to overlook it if they presented a sensible counter narrative, but I just don't see a scenario here where Wanda is the good guy.
And how is she the bad guy though? She has powers she did not really understand and in her grief created this world without realizing it. I am not saying it should be without repercussions and I think we will see that in The Multiverse of Madness.