Can this guy play RW or is he exclusively a LW?
Awesome, thanks!In my viewings he’s been playing RW
If I’m not mistaken, for the most part this playoff he’s been on the right side on a line with Roobroeck and Ritchie. He looks like the type that can player either side though. Also, I’m of the belief though that most wingers can play either side
WIth the Kraken drafting at 8 he may have moved ahead of Catton for me.Rate 14 on BM’s latest poll of scouts. I’d be surprised if he doesn’t go higher.
Who's the douche? I want to get blocked too!No, I'm blocked by that douche
Well, he punched his ticket to the OHL finals. Or rather it was punched for him. He wasn't dressed in game 7. Anyone know if he's injured?
Edit: He sustained an upper body injury in game 6 and was scratched for game 7. I don't know what that means for him in the finals against London.
Yes, I'm not the most consistent on there but but I'm trying @BCprospectAre you on Twitter?
Oshawa aren't really disclosing anything but I heard it was a game time decision when he couldn't play game 7, so hopefully he's back for game 1.
Habs need to get a good look at him in case the draft order doesn't have Lindstrom or Demidov available at 5.
Not sure why the Habs seem so intent on drafting a forward.
This isn't the NFL where players immediately step in and play after the draft.
Sennecke is multiple years away and so are more of the draft eligibles, even the ones available in the top 10.
Besides if the Habs drafted someone like Silayev (if he's the BPA at 5) they could always turn around and trade Guhle for a good forward to make room.
Because they have a group of young defenseman that they feel very strong about, they're trying to compete sooner not later, trading Guhle who is already a very good defenseman to move backwards with another green defenseman isn't what they want to do.
Their holes are up front and they'll be able to get a great forward at 5 without getting into saturating an already saturated and further along blueline group on a maybe.
They don't have to trade Guhle now, where did you get that from my post?
Like I said, the player they'll be selecting at 5th OVR will be years away from playing, whether they take a forward or defenseman.
Doesn't matter if they take Silayev or Sennecke, it'll probably be until at least 2026/27 until they play.
At THAT time if the young D they pick is ready to play they could make room for him by trading a defenseman for a forward.
Drafting for need is stupid and the Habs should pick BPA even if that player doesn't "fit" the current makeup of the roster.
Every team picking at the top considers their roster needs. They're not gonna be 3 years from now trading Guhle who would be a leader, well established defenseman on the roster to bring in a rookie who has never played in North America before.
That's just an insane thing to do.
Definitely fair all around, especially about Buium/Silayev/Dickinson vs. Reinbacher (although I think the kid will be alright).You draft the prospect you think is going to be the best player regardless of positional need.
If the Habs brass thinks Silayev/Buium is that guy, you take him and worry about having too many good defenseman later, as it's always possible to swap players with another team that helps fill a greater need on the roster of both teams.
You don't draft Sennecke/Iginla over the BPA because you need a forward right now, because who knows if that's going to be the case a couple years from now.
Maybe the Habs legitimately have a forward as the BPA on the board at 5, in which case go for it, but something tells me if they pick a guy like Sennecke/Iginla it's because they talked themselves into it because of the greater need for a forward.
Of course what makes this all amusing is that reaching for Reinbacher instead of Michkov/Leonard will mean not only did the Habs miss out on a better forward than they'll get at #5 this year, but I think most neutral observers would take Buium/Silayev/Dickinson over Reinbacher as well. Worst of both worlds.
They did it with Romanov though, who got us Dach. I think Guhle or Xhekaj could get us a pretty solid top 6 foward eventually.. They have also been battling through some injuries. Ideally we draft a foward, but that Silayev kid is quite something.Every team picking at the top considers their roster needs. They're not gonna be 3 years from now trading Guhle who would be a leader, well established defenseman on the roster to bring in a rookie who has never played in North America before.
That's just an insane thing to do.
They did it with Romanov though, who got us Dach. I think Guhle or Xhekaj could get us a pretty solid top 6 foward eventually.. They have also been battling through some injuries. Ideally we draft a foward, but that Silayev kid is quite something.
The Habs Dman prospects aren't good or deep enough to pass on the BPA and this guy is a really safe pick and probably too high for the Habs to take him, can't remember exactly where they are picking but to me Sennece is closer to 20 than 10....but size......Because they have a group of young defenseman that they feel very strong about, they're trying to compete sooner not later, trading Guhle who is already a very good defenseman to move backwards with another green defenseman isn't what they want to do.
Their holes are up front and they'll be able to get a great forward at 5 without getting into saturating an already saturated and further along blueline group on a maybe.
There are no slam dunk HoF type of defenseman available either this year. The most intriguing are Dickinson and Buium, both are IMO very solid but unless we move Hutson or Guhle for a very good top 6 player, they should pass on them.The Habs Dman prospects aren't good or deep enough to pass on the BPA and this guy is a really safe pick and probably too high for the Habs to take him, can't remember exactly where they are picking but to me Sennece is closer to 20 than 10....but size......
I think there are 5 or 6 better potential all round Dman than Hutson there and maybe Guhle as well but maybe it's only 3 or 4.There are no slam dunk HoF type of defenseman available either this year. The most intriguing are Dickinson and Buium, both are IMO very solid but unless we move Hutson or Guhle for a very good top 6 player, they should pass on them.
Your content is great man. Keep up the good work!Yes, I'm not the most consistent on there but but I'm trying @BCprospect
Recruits, like Grant McCagg? If yes, he's maybe the biggest Sennecke fan on that planet so he certainly had something to do with his selection at 5.They did a mock draft on the Sick/Recrutes podcast on Tuesday, I believe it was. Their top 5 mock went:
1. Celebrini
2. Demidov
3. Lidstrom
4. Buium
5. Sennecke
These are pro scouts (not attached to an orgainization, but still). I think when it comes to Sennecke, where there's smoke...
Sure, that's your opinion, but the view in the scouting community has shifted. In Bob's lottery rankings, three scouts out of 10 surveyed placed Sennecke inside top 10, one of the three at 5OV. Recrutes put him at 5 and at the Athletic podcast featuring Peters, Wheeler, and Pronman, it was stated that Sennecke is in the conversation for the top 10 now.The Habs Dman prospects aren't good or deep enough to pass on the BPA and this guy is a really safe pick and probably too high for the Habs to take him, can't remember exactly where they are picking but to me Sennece is closer to 20 than 10....but size......
The Habs Dman prospects aren't good or deep enough to pass on the BPA and this guy is a really safe pick and probably too high for the Habs to take him, can't remember exactly where they are picking but to me Sennece is closer to 20 than 10....but size......