flyingfingers
Registered User
- Mar 6, 2024
- 170
- 190
I'm supposed to put stock into what TSN analysts think of Tarasenko?
Let's not play these stupid games. He's a 2nd line scorer that put up top 6 numbers for us despite playing a fair bit of the season at 3rd line RW and almost exclusively on PP2.
I didn't list the 4th that Kane returned because the 4th was likely for Mikkola. And yes I listed it as a conditional 1st for that very reason.
I'm not considering it a catastrophe he got a future 3rd and a 4th, but you're rationalizing this as if this wasn't a return universally viewed as god awful even given the circumstances.
The return is only being viewed as "god awful" by Sens fan here and on Twitter who overrate the player because he was a decent bright spot around a lot of shit. I mean, some Sens fans seem to be pointing to the Wennberg deal as being proof... despite the fact that Wennberg is the more useful player.
Reasonable people around the hockey world (like TSN analysts) are certainly not taking the stance of this being a terrible return.
And Tarasenko has been a second-line scorer on a 28th-place team. He's not a second-line scorer on a Stanley Cup contender. He's a depth piece and the Panthers paid a depth piece price.
Also, by your logic, if Kane got a 1st, Tarasenko got two 3rds, not a 3rd and 4th.
Like I said before, without a NMC, I think Tarasenko could have gotten a 2nd and 4th, the same as Mantha. So am I shocked that considering he had control of the trade, he got a 3rd and 4th? No. It is what it is.
What was crazy was people throwing out things like a 1st rounder or Anton Lundell.
Last edited: