So...where to after the tournament? He hasn't hit the 40 game mark to burn a UFA year so maybe we should just leave him off the roster considering this season is going nowhere for the habs.
He's having a great year so far...made the habs roster at 19, played top pairing and 2nd pairing minutes, went to the WJC and is arguably Canada's best player. If we can loan him to a European team so he can work on his offense for the remainder of this year that would be great.
Bring him back next season permanently.
Is he hurt?
Hearing in London Mete to be returned after WJC? Any word leaking out in Montreal.
And he is going to the Olympics?
Furthermore, Duthie and McKenzie spoke about Mete's fate after this tournament. McKenzie says that he hears that Montreal will send Mete back to London after the tournament with the intention to allow him to participate in the Olympics. He said Montreal tells those who ask that they will decide after the tournament. But Bob is convinced the decision is already made.
Furthermore, Duthie and McKenzie spoke about Mete's fate after this tournament. McKenzie says that he hears that Montreal will send Mete back to London after the tournament with the intention to allow him to participate in the Olympics. He said Montreal tells those who ask that they will decide after the tournament. But Bob is convinced the decision is already made.
Good, despite what Ferraro would tell you, or Duthie, Timmins was not the best defensemen for Team Canada. Overall that would go to Mete or Fabbro imo.
If Mete can go to the Olympics good for him, keeps him away from the distractions on and off the ice in Montreal while giving him some international play.
If it weren't for the Olympics, I'd say to bring Mete back to Habs. It's not exactly the most successful environment at the moment, but I would prefer Habs axe this season, trade their best assets for promising prospects and picks and play guys they plan for their future. Despite the crappy losing record, Mete can learn a lot more playing in the NHL, even if it's for 10 minutes a game. My opinion, of course.
You can't ignore the lack of size but he's only 19. He has plenty of time to get stronger. It's amazing he did as well as he did in his NHL stint at 19 being that small. That says A LOT. Top pairing is possible for him imo.
I'm glad they are sending him back to London. At 19, I think he's better served getting big minutes at all situations and playing against his peer group vs. his likely fate in Montreal, getting 10 minutes a night when he isn't pressboxed. Plus, I wouldn't have to know anything about Dale Hunter's staff to know Mete will be better served in his development in London. He'd make a mistake in Montreal, look back for some instruction and all he'd get is JJD's vacant eyes looking back at him.If it weren't for the Olympics, I'd say to bring Mete back to Habs. It's not exactly the most successful environment at the moment, but I would prefer Habs axe this season, trade their best assets for promising prospects and picks and play guys they plan for their future. Despite the crappy losing record, Mete can learn a lot more playing in the NHL, even if it's for 10 minutes a game. My opinion, of course.
Gostisbehere: 5'11"
Barrie: 5'10"
Butcher: 5'10"
I know most defencemen in the Top 20 scoring are over six foot, but that doesn't mean you can't be a top four defenceman at 5'10".
Krug, Subban, Leddy, Karlsson, letang, Spurgeon, Mcavoy, Montour, Morrissey, Stralman, Faulk, Vatanen, Faulk, Girard are all six and under...
Crazy how Subbam and Faulk are considered average to big and Mete is considered tiny... with 2 inches in difference...
I'd like to see him start in Laval next year too... we need to patient. I'd also like to see him partner with Juuls as I think they'd complement each other beautifully and could be a top 4 pair for the next decade.I want him to improve his shot and game in Laval before not just London
Crazy how Subbam and Faulk are considered average to big and Mete is considered tiny... with 2 inches in difference...
I always loved arguments about certain centres being too small and when you bring up Crosby, the goalposts change to, "Oh well Crosby is STRONG so it's okay he's 5'11". Like just say it's not height then.
And alot of those guys have their height boosted too. I met Scott Stevens once, and he's under 6 feet for sure. Built like a frigging tank, but dude was shorter than me.Over the century the NHL has existed, theres like 20% of players that won hardware that were actually taller than 6' and thats mostly because of Lemieux, Jagr and Ovi.
(Ok its not an actual number )
Oh crap I just realized that if we send him back to junior he'll probably have to impress the brass again in next year's training camp otherwise he'll get sent to Sly and co. in Laval.