Claimed off Waivers: [VGK] Golden Knights re-claim F Raphael Lavoie off waivers from the Oilers - assigned to AHL

Muffin

Avalanche Flavoured
Aug 14, 2009
17,773
20,999
Edmonton
I'm not understanding why Vegas can claim, waive, Edmonton re-claims but then Vegas can re-claim and he goes to Henderson instead of Bakersfield? Isn't Edmonton the original waiving team?
Guess Vegas is considered the original team now. Weird thing is the team that was higher in the standings put in a claim when the Oilers tried to send him to the AHL but not this time?
 
  • Like
Reactions: KrisLetAngry

Hallzy

Registered User
Mar 18, 2022
144
144
What an incredible ride for Raph.... 2nd rounder to cracking Team Canadas WJC team, to fairly highly regarded, to hes kinda "meh", to tug-o-war between beautiful Edmonton and Vegas....
 

WarriorofTime

Registered User
Jul 3, 2010
31,541
20,618
When Vegas first claimed him off waivers yes they were. But then after Vegas waived him and the Oilers re-claimed him, Vegas became the “original team”
So if Edmonton re-claimed (again) wouldn't it just be an endless loop? Why wouldn't he have gone straight to Bakersfield when Edmonton was the only claimer after Vegas waived him?
 

Muffin

Avalanche Flavoured
Aug 14, 2009
17,773
20,999
Edmonton
Guessing Colorado was the team that put in the claim earlier when the Oilers tried to send him down but with Kahkonen available they picked him up instead but didn't want to waste two roster spots on both? :dunno:
 

WarriorofTime

Registered User
Jul 3, 2010
31,541
20,618
Edmontron wasn't the only claimer when Vegas waived him.
Gotcha... so Edmonton claimed him with the intent of assigning, but someone else also claimed so they had to keep him up or re-waive. They chose to re-waive. But this mysterious third team changed didn't claim this time, so Vegas was able to re-claim and automatically assign?

Who was the third team..? Calgary?
 

djdub

This Space for Rent
Oct 1, 2011
1,384
161
Calgary, AB
Does this mean a team above EDM in the standings colluded with Vegas to put in a claim when Edmonton claimed him?

Why would that team put in a claim in at all and not put one in when Edmonton waived him?

Seems fishy.
 

madmike77

Registered User
Jan 9, 2009
6,727
664
Gotcha... so Edmonton claimed him with the intent of assigning, but someone else also claimed so they had to keep him up or re-waive. They chose to re-waive. But this mysterious third team changed didn't claim this time, so Vegas was able to re-claim and automatically assign?

Who was the third team..? Calgary?
Calgary did lose a depth centre when Vegas claimed Schwindt so it’s possible. They could use another AHL centre. But who knows?
 

WarriorofTime

Registered User
Jul 3, 2010
31,541
20,618
NHL should at least do some due diligence here to see if it was collusion. It's kinda fishy someone else made a claim forcing Edmonton to put him back on Waivers but then let Vegas claim him back into the AHL.

We're obviously talking about the margins here, but Edmonton basically lost an AHL prospect for nothing. Feels like it could have been Vegas going "hey, we'll scratch your back if you scratch ours here"
 

theslatcher

Registered User
Jan 5, 2016
8,186
5,919
Sweden
Gotcha... so Edmonton claimed him with the intent of assigning, but someone else also claimed so they had to keep him up or re-waive. They chose to re-waive. But this mysterious third team changed didn't claim this time, so Vegas was able to re-claim and automatically assign?

Who was the third team..? Calgary?
Calgary would've gotten him if they had put in a claim. It was one of Colorado, Boston, Vancouver, Winnipeg, Florida, Carolina, Dallas, or Rangers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WarriorofTime

MMC

Global Moderator
May 11, 2014
51,303
43,412
Orange County, CA
NHL should at least do some due diligence here to see if it was collusion. It's kinda fishy someone else made a claim forcing Edmonton to put him back on Waivers but then let Vegas claim him back into the AHL.

We're obviously talking about the margins here, but Edmonton basically lost an AHL prospect for nothing. Feels like it could have been Vegas going "hey, we'll scratch your back if you scratch ours here"
This is pretty wild, there’s a number of factors that contribute to whether a team is even in a position to make a waiver claim on a given day even if they want to given how tight teams are to the cap. Cap/roster situations are constantly in flux, suspecting foul play here makes no sense to me.
 

WarriorofTime

Registered User
Jul 3, 2010
31,541
20,618
This is pretty wild, there’s a number of factors that contribute to whether a team is even in a position to make a waiver claim on a given day even if they want to given how tight teams are to the cap. Cap/roster situations are constantly in flux, suspecting foul play here makes no sense to me.
I don't know how it makes "no sense", you're right that there are other potential reasons, but to completely rule out collusion as a possibility seems naive. We're what.. a year removed from a team lying about a player's no trade clause.
 

Petes2424

Registered User
Aug 4, 2005
8,505
3,319
And Vegas has now done it two years in a row.

Targeted a former high pick (on waivers) and rather than be forced to keep him in the NHL, got him through waivers (immediately) again, to assign him to their own AHL team instead. A couple speed bumps this time around, but results ultimately the same.

Denisenko last year and Lavoie this year. Assume they’ll try the same with Schwindt as soon as Calgary’s roster settles down.

Vegas needs to add players to their organization who are close to being ready, because of the turnover in their bottom six every year, coupled with how many ELCs they have with players who are still a ways from being NHL players.

Whether these guys work out or not, who knows, but it is interesting that Edmonton was the target of both offersheets, and the old school waiver move we used to see a lot back in the day, but since managers started being so nice to each other these days, we don’t see it very often anymore. I can only think of the two examples in recent time, and Vegas did it both times.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dutronc

WarriorofTime

Registered User
Jul 3, 2010
31,541
20,618
That was in 2021 brother.
The unveiling was more recent

And Vegas has now done it two years in a row.

Targeted a former high pick (on waivers) and rather than be forced to keep him in the NHL, got him through waivers (immediately) again, to assign him to their own AHL team instead. A couple speed bumps this time around, but results ultimately the same.

Denisenko last year and Lavoie this year. Assume they’ll try the same with Schwindt as soon as Calgary’s roster settles down.

Vegas needs to add players to their organization who are close to being ready, because of the turnover in their bottom six every year, coupled with how many ELCs they have with players who are still a ways from being NHL players.

Whether these guys work out or not, who knows, but it is interesting that Edmonton was the target of both offersheets, and the old school waiver move we used to see a lot back in the day, but since managers started being so nice to each other these days, we don’t see it very often anymore. I can only think of the two examples in recent time, and Vegas did it both times.
The offer sheets made sense though, Edmonton's cap situation is f*cked and those guys weren't that expensive [not crazy offersheet comp] and decent candidates to break out with bigger opportunity. It's basically the perfect storm of circumstances needed for an offersheet to make sense.

Denisenko's 1-way contract probably lead Florida to be OK with not re-claiming him (to put back into their own AHL team) so they weren't spending $775K on an AHL player after he didn't make the team out of camp.
 

SEALBound

Fancy Gina Carano
Sponsor
Jun 13, 2010
42,809
21,671
Lavoie is going to show to the AHL rink and be like


green-mile-im-tired-boss.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: Morrison

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad