People talk about NYR roster like it's the 1999 Rangers. We have two forwards in our Top 9 who are not at/under the age of 26, and their names are Rick Nash and Mats Zuccarello. Not to mention we have the flexibility now to trade Nash and acquire a D, possibly.
Not only is the Rangers F group not on the decline, it has a chance to be the best group of forwards we've had in years, one of the youngest Top 9s in the league at great cap value (outside of Nash, who regardless of his contract is still extremely effective on the ice when healthy).
Yes, our D is looking pretty bad, but Lundqvist balances it out so that we wind up looking more like a team with mediocre D and mediocre Goaltending, rather than what we are which is a team with terrible D and an outstanding Goalie. And again, Gorton is not done with this roster. I would actually argue that our D is better right now than it was in 2015 pre-Yandle trade, when we were still in our way to winning the President's Trophy with or without Yandle.
Narratives change on a dime in the NHL. I guarantee Gorton finds a way to improve the D before camp starts, if not by the trade deadline. For all the negative talk surrounding the Rangers, we're still finishing with 96-100+ points every year, and have a ton of young promise up front (plus Skjei on the back end). Right now, I actually think this roster is better than the one we had headed into camp last year, when everyone get hurt, we sucked all year except the first 3 months, and still found a way to finish with one of the best records in the East.
But we hear this every year with the Rangers. People said our window had closed when we were down 3-1 against Pittsburgh in the 2014 playoffs. Then the next season it was "oh yeah, that was a fluke, they're def done." Then we win the President's and get within one win of returning to the finals with literally all our best players hurt, "OK, now they're really done." 2016, we had one of our worst years in recent memory...still managed 100 pts and though we lost first round, we DID lose to the Cup winners who ran over everybody.
So why did Vesey choose the Rangers? Why not? We've consistently been one of the best teams in the NHL over the past 4 years despite the gloomy predictions that this team seems to garner every single year. While people rub off about "OMG FARM SYSTEM!" re: Buffalo, Winnipeg, Edmonton, Toronto, Florida, Islanders, and a thousand other teams that never seem to actually...you know, win games and stuff.
"Why didn't he choose the Blackhawks?" Because they literally have the worst salary cap predicament in the league and, I dunno, maybe it wasn't a good fit for him? He wanted the East Coast, and he signed with the best, most promising team on the East Coast, which is the Rangers AINEC.
I see your "No prospects" and raise you a "VALUE THIRD ROUNDERS THAT TURN INTO BUCHNEVICH AND STEALING COLLEGE FAs FROM OTHER TEAMS".
/obnoxious homer rant