ACC1224
Super Elite, Passing ALL Tests since 2002
- Aug 19, 2002
- 78,349
- 45,602
zeroHow many points for Amadio tonight? How many of them goals?
zeroHow many points for Amadio tonight? How many of them goals?
undisclosed injuries and secret identities, man Vegas is weird
Can you take this out of the GDT please?Your commentary and viewpoints are part of the problem. All you talk about is "analytics"....perhaps that's what you do....but that's not the point nor my business. My opinion (and it's just mine) is that analytics are over used ad nauseum. They do not (in their entirety) reveal the true make up of a player....let alone a team. Now, I'll admit there is some use for them BUT.....a keen and experienced at winning hockey coach & GM (without the aid of stats) will win out 10/10 times. Look at all the analytics driven trades Dubas has made & I rest my case. I just read about how bad the Marchment trade for Malgin was.....case in point. We need experienced mgmt to go anywhere. I hope you at least agree on that!
I think the problem is they don't have anyone screening the goal tender and causing trouble for the defensmen JT is there but of to the side.1-3-1 is standard across the entire NHL. It's really not the issue.
I think the bigger crime is not putting Spezza on the top one. You could also argue that Sandin should be swapped with Rielly.
My take:
Tavares
Matthews - Nylander - Spezza
Rielly
Ritchie
Engvall - Bunting - Marner
Sandin
Spezza is a big shooting threat and he's a fantastic puck handler. You can put him in the bumper spot too. I think Rielly has been far too hesitant in shooting or using lanes properly on the PP1. He's relying on distributing to Matthews or Marner far too often but without Marner, I think Rielly can dish to Spezza who can actually be a scoring one-timer threat instead of passing it to Marner where everyone knows what he's going to do (curl, carry, wrister blocked -- out)
Marner has struggled immensely on the PP but maybe giving him less minutes on it and a different set of players to play with might kind of jar something loose. Let him be the primary forward on it. It would be similar to when Nylander was on the 2nd PP to let him handle that unit and it kinda worked.
Could swap Sandin and Rielly but I'd rather give Sandin the horns of the PP2 with Marner since it would miss a bit of a shooting threat.
Thanks for the reply. Speed is an issue, rose colored glass my friend. Watch him close. He us out of shape. He is 10.5m out of shape. I fact he is 1m out of shape and if he was paid 1m he would be gone.I've been watching him. Speed has not been the issue. He's one of the fastest players on the team... I feel silly having to explain this.
Either way this will be my last reply to you since you clearly don't have a clue.
Hope you are right but I have my doubtsYes we expect him to be a line driver and he played well in the last 2 games. He has produced with and without Matthews, he had a shit playoff no sugar coating it, and a bad start to the season. But you also need to acknowledge that he played well in the last 2. But yes we need him to produce, hopefully he can keep the momentum going, he did a lot of good things for us last game.
He's #16, Ritchie is #20.Thanks for the reply. Speed is an issue, rose colored glass my friend. Watch him close. He us out of shape. He is 10.5m out of shape. I fact he is 1m out of shape and if he was paid 1m he would be gone.
Where have all these 'hockey stats' got us? Last time I saw the Leafs win was in 67....and for for info I took Stats at the U of T... so don't presume I do not understand....that's being condenscending and unworthy of us true TML fans.
He's #16, Ritchie is #20.
Where has the eye test got us? We haven't won since 67' using it. It must not be working.
I am not entirely dismissive of stats. But, if we review some of Dubas' analytical driven trades (most recent being Malgin/Marchment) don't look good either. I agree, it's a tough one.Where has the eye test got us? We haven't won since 67' using it. It must not be working.
You use every available tool at your disposal, to try and build the best team, and evaluate. I don't know how you could have taken Stats, and at the same time be completely dismissive of the same. The talk is as if, one persons stats are the only way possible, that someone else isn't better at understanding them, or that it's understanding and use doesn't grow over time. To be so dismissive of "stats" is just so incredibly short sighted that it's ridiculous.
I am not entirely dismissive of stats. But, if we review some of Dubas' analytical driven trades (most recent being Malgin/Marchment) don't look good either. I agree, it's a tough one.
WE FINNA f***in DESTROY THIS OTHER ORGANIZATION TONIGHT SIRE!!NICE!!! I LOVE LIFE!! INVEST HARD: THEY AIN'T HAVE NONE OF THEIR PLAYERS WITH THEM!!!!!!! WOOOOP WOOOPP!! TWERK SOME GET SOME!!!! TWERK TWERK TWERK TWERK THAT THANG!!!!!!!!!!!! GET IT!! GET IT!! WHOOP THAT TRICK!! WHOOP THAT TRICK!!! WE IS WINNERS, !!! THEY IS NOT!!!! THey ain't have NO PLAYERS AT ALL OR STARS!! WE DO!!!!! WHO DO WE TRUST WHO DO WE TRUST: WE!!! THAT*S WHO!!!
Thank you for this analysis.The Leafs tend to the play to the level of their competition which makes ever games outcome anything but certain.
WE FINNA f***in DESTROY THIS OTHER ORGANIZATION TONIGHT SIRE!!NICE!!! I LOVE LIFE!! INVEST HARD: THEY AIN'T HAVE NONE OF THEIR PLAYERS WITH THEM!!!!!!! WOOOOP WOOOPP!! TWERK SOME GET SOME!!!! TWERK TWERK TWERK TWERK THAT THANG!!!!!!!!!!!! GET IT!! GET IT!! WHOOP THAT TRICK!! WHOOP THAT TRICK!!! WE IS WINNERS, !!! THEY IS NOT!!!! THey ain't have NO PLAYERS AT ALL OR STARS!! WE DO!!!!! WHO DO WE TRUST WHO DO WE TRUST: WE!!! THAT*S WHO!!!
WE FINNA f***in DESTROY THIS OTHER ORGANIZATION TONIGHT SIRE!!NICE!!! I LOVE LIFE!! INVEST HARD: THEY AIN'T HAVE NONE OF THEIR PLAYERS WITH THEM!!!!!!! WOOOOP WOOOPP!! TWERK SOME GET SOME!!!! TWERK TWERK TWERK TWERK THAT THANG!!!!!!!!!!!! GET IT!! GET IT!! WHOOP THAT TRICK!! WHOOP THAT TRICK!!! WE IS WINNERS, !!! THEY IS NOT!!!! THey ain't have NO PLAYERS AT ALL OR STARS!! WE DO!!!!! WHO DO WE TRUST WHO DO WE TRUST: WE!!! THAT*S WHO!!!
Excited for this one. Feel like in the last couple of games we've slowly started to turn the corner. Tonight will either confirm that, or put us in the dumps again. Let's go boys!