Vegas about to circumvent cap again? UPD: Mark Stone back practicing.

It all depends on how the cap accruals through the season would be taken into account. Point is, putting in a cap in the playoffs, you have to account for cap accruals, retained salaries, buyouts, there's too many things to account for and that need agreement on.
In any case, finding a way to implement a salary cap in the playoffs is itself a problem that must be solved before we can begin to apply it as a solution to anything else.
Removing cap post deadline really isn't that radical. There's already no cap for the playoffs. I also think removing the cap gives other benefits aside from evening the playing field and addressing the LTIR issue.

Yes, I do think the main issue with LTIR/playoffs is the random benefit from timing of an injury. What do you think is the core issue then? If you say its about some team managing when a player comes back from injury, that'll never get solved.
You're just asserting stuff here. Your idea isn't radical, and my core issue is never getting solved. You're entitled to each of those opinions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ted Hoffman
You're not going to realize this no matter how many times I try to explain this, but you are never getting the owners to sign off on not having a cap for any part of the regular season, no matter when you decide to set a deadline for the cap to be lifted. And, you've veered way away from the problem you intended to fix to ... "fixing" a non-problem with a non-solution.

Someone else is going to have to explain it to you so it finally clicks, or you're going to have to figure it out yourself.

Yeah I'm done with your low-key passive aggressive know-it-all tone. Don't have the time or stamina to get into it with someone who can't have a discussion without being insulting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VivaLasVegas
Some people's assertions about how their idea has to be correct and is immune to criticism reminds me of a project I've been involved in for 4 years and counting: getting data at the level we want to do the analyses we want.

Sounds simple, right? Just pull all the data, there you go! And then you realize the source system doesn't do that cleanly. And, the way it provides data is a jumbled mess and you can't just accumulate it neatly, so you have to create rules to organize the data correctly so you can accumulate it. But, as you build rules to organize you realize "if I offset X, I should get Y" only works in some situations, in others you get Y' and you really do want Y. So now you have to have a rule for some situation that gets you Y, but suddenly R shows up elsewhere. Oh, and now there's a situation C* you have to deal with that screws up everything, so now you have to write more rules for that.

4 years. From identifying "what do we want" to "where should it go" to "how to we quality check this" both in a single field and across multiple fields, to "how do we accumulate this so it's correct at a given point in time" to "how do we make this so that we can join other data easily and in the correct order," every step has been asking questions, making sure we get the right answers, running through scenarios, asking questions knowing what problems we'd like to solve and asking does this help us get there and do that?

The point I'm trying to make here for some of you: solutions are rarely as easy as they seem. Troubleshoot your ideas. Spend more than 3 seconds thinking about it. Try to pick holes in them, ask does this really make sense? If you find a hole, ask do I need to change my solution entirely, or can I come up with an easy solution to that - and then does that cause a problem I didn't anticipate. Listen to feedback, when someone tells you hey, there's a problem here don't just ignore it and say "bah, that will never happen, my solution is so easy it's practically foolproof!" If you're not doing any of that, you're wasting your time touting a non-solution that almost certainly doesn't fix the problem and creates more problems than it solves.
 
Vegas is doing NOTHING against the rules. Blame the league for allowing it to happen.

By the way not a Vegas fan.

On the other hand Ottawa got penalized far to harshly for what happened last year when they tried to trade Dadonov . Strangely, the league only reversed themselves after Vegas complained. And took no responsibility in they themselves not having complete records of players contracts before they approve trades.

By the way not a Sens fan.
 
12 paragraph essay incoming.

dd8eafaa-2a04-48d9-8ec9-47776222aa15_text.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: Morrison


Not against what they are doing.. thrilled to hear patera is back in the equation! Hope it goes well for Hertl.

LV as the 8th seed going in with a 100million roster. They will be breaking someone's heart.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WhataKnight
Vegas is doing NOTHING against the rules. Blame the league for allowing it to happen.

By the way not a Vegas fan.

On the other hand Ottawa got penalized far to harshly for what happened last year when they tried to trade Dadonov . Strangely, the league only reversed themselves after Vegas complained. And took no responsibility in they themselves not having complete records of players contracts before they approve trades.

By the way not a Sens fan.
NJ and the Kovy contract wasnt "against the rules" either. NHL still did something about it since it was obvious.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gab6511
I know it won't happen, but what would happen if he came back for the last game of the season. Would VGK need to clear cap? How?
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad