But just to make it clearer, no I'm not in love with Vegas exploiting this loophole while at the same time understanding that it's permissible under the rules even though it probably shouldn't be.
I also don't find the "circumvention" as odious last year because most of Vegas' acquisitions didn't play in the playoffs or barely did so, so they really only got the benefit of Barbashev as an addition. The biggest chunk of 10 mil over the cap came from Quick's contract who didn't face a single shot in the postseason. With Barbashev, Vegas was either minimally over the cap or under it when accounting for players that were actually playing.
That said, I feel differently about it today. As entertaining as it's been to see Vegas pick up Mantha, Hanifin, and Hertl without trading off any core roster pieces, if all of those players plus Stone are available for a run, I'd feel dirty about cheering for it. It's a much bigger tilt in roster strength than they got last year.
And beyond that, I was a hypocrite because the reality is I wasn't all that pissed at what Tampa did so much as I'm generally adverse to repeat cup winners and was frustrated at seeing Tampa doing so well. So I fixated on one less savory thing they did and was loudly pissy about it. Just like fans do with the Knights all the time. Or just like fans do when they're reacting to dirty hits done by another team until a player on theirs does it and all of a sudden it's "he should keep his head up" or "not my guy's fault he's bigger, taller and stronger". It happens all the time on this site.
I'm willing to admit when I'm wrong (like me repeatedly saying Vegas doesn't have the assets to make a splash, I was clearly wrong about that) or when I'm being hypocritical. My shit talking about Tampa was for a bad faith purpose and I admit it. Trying to grow every day.