Confirmed with Link: [VAN/SEA] Daniel Sprong to Seattle for Future Considerations

Peen

Rejoicing in a Benning-free world
Oct 6, 2013
31,464
27,720
Wonder if the league ever goes to the idea of running essentially 10 or 11F and using one or two of the extra F spots for specific utilities. e.g., Juulsen for the PK, Sprong for 3rd periods when teams sit back and are just dumping it in.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lindgren

Bojack Horvatman

IAMGROOT
Jun 15, 2016
4,558
8,343
I'm guessing this is to clear cap so that Gillis can trade Samuelsson for Booth.

In all seriousness. I don't really get this. Maybe just doing it for the player. Weird timing though with the Boeser injury and immediately trading someone that can play top 6 RW. Hopefully that means good news with Brock or with Joshua
 
  • Like
Reactions: SeawaterOnIce

Bojack Horvatman

IAMGROOT
Jun 15, 2016
4,558
8,343
This was a warning to Petey, score goals or the bunny gets it !!!

09476a10-460a-45e6-9a33-928e813e1c12_text.gif
 

Bitz and Bites

Registered User
May 5, 2012
1,779
907
Victoria
Sprong is one of those guys like Virtanen who’s just hard to fit into a lineup. He’s too individualistic to mesh with good top six players and doesn’t have the PK usage and ability to be trusted when holding a lead in the third period like you need from a bottom six player. Sure he might be able to pop in a few goals playing against some teams AHL level fourth lines and bottom pairings (like Virtanen did) but he’s just too limited and will probably hurt the team as much as he helps.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nick Lang and Ernie

logan5

Registered User
May 24, 2011
6,659
4,801
Vancouver - Mt. Pleasant
Yeah, bizarre timing unless Boeser has been immediately cleared, which seems unlikely.

Lekkerimaki is getting ventilated at ES in Abbotsford and I don't like any notion of 'doing a Gaudette' and yanking a guy back and forth when he's adjusting to his first season of pro hockey. Give him 40 games there before making any decisions.

I suspect that Tocchet has voiced that he prefers Bains in the squad over Sprong (ironically given the good chemistry of those two players) and that's why this has happened.
FYI. SHL is a high level pro hockey league. And I presume you are basing your "he is getting ventilated" on. his minus figure so far in Abby. Last year in the SHL he was near the top of his team in plus minus, in a league that is arguably superior to the AHL. He was a plus 6 ob a terrible Orebro team.
 
Last edited:

thecupismine

Registered User
Apr 1, 2007
2,616
1,865
Three things I take out of the move:

One, they prefer Bains over Sprong on the fourth line. Weird, as I thought they had good chemistry together, but with Joshua getting healthy there's a space issue. Tocchet calling Bains a good young player and not a prospect was pretty telling.

Two, roster space is about to become an issue. Joshua is coming back, and I'm praying this means good news on Boeser not being out long term.

Three, they're thinking about cap space. Bains/Raty can constantly yo-yo up and down as the 13th forward, which helps them accrue space quicker. I would've be surprised if this was done because they math'd out that this allows them to make a move for a blueliner in late January/early Feb instead of March.
 

valkynax

The LEEDAR
Sponsor
May 19, 2011
11,104
12,601
Burnaby
I'm guessing this is to clear cap so that Gillis can trade Samuelsson for Booth.

In all seriousness. I don't really get this. Maybe just doing it for the player. Weird timing though with the Boeser injury and immediately trading someone that can play top 6 RW. Hopefully that means good news with Brock or with Joshua

If they say Sprong was a problem in the locker room, that I can understand.

Whatever, let's see what comes next.
 

cc

Registered User
Feb 28, 2002
10,017
1,908
Its not as if it's a big issue to lose Sprong but unless there is some 4d chess in play, I fail to see how this move makes the team better.

With other moves, you can see the reasoning but I can't really see a good reason to move sprong at this point in time.

I guess we'll see if this move is linked to something else in the works
 

TruGr1t

Proper Villain
Jun 26, 2003
24,742
9,412
Assume this is all to do with Allvin's absolute obsession with accruing cap space, and this was better in their opinion than waiving him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chiripa20

VanJack

Registered User
Jul 11, 2014
22,643
16,130
I can just taste the sweet future considerations now!
Return is probably based on what Sprong does in Seattle......if he recovers his scoring touch, maybe a late round pick from the Kraken.

Or maybe there's a guy on their Coachella Valley farm team the Canucks have their eye one. Regardless, there's one thing you have to say about Allvin. When he decides a guy isn't working out, he doesn't hesitate to pull the trigger

Sprong, Mikheyev, Kuzmenko, Podkolzin, Beauvillier and Dickinson---all jettisoned. And he doesn't much care which team they go to. No hesitation in trading these guys, even to divisional opponents.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ziploc

jd22

Registered User
Aug 16, 2008
2,060
1,935
Netherlands
I honestly think I started this account years ago to warn Ducks fans about this guy

Stunned that no one has caught on yet

He's a beyond unbearable teammate. Horrible person to around

Stunned that any team even signs him in the first place. Shows how much hockey is run by dinosaurs and people who don't understand you need to build a cohesive locker room

Not even worth attempting to recoup an asset on him. Just an all around waste of talent

I knew him way back in Major Junior and he was a massive asshat and a locker room cancer. With how many teams he's played on and the inability to really stick anywhere I wonder if this hasn't changed. He didn't get along with the coaches, made crazy demands, stayed away from teammates and wouldnt sign anything for kids or fans. He was a massive diva.

Hm.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nona Di Giuseppe

Bourne Endeavor

Registered User
Apr 6, 2009
38,904
7,851
Montreal, Quebec
On the one hand, it's odd but... I do kind of get the madness. Bains has played much better after a slow start, Raty's looked decently promising and it's all but written in stone they want to give Lekk a chance. All in all, it makes more sense to give that spot to a rookie we have control over than a one dimensional UFA we aren't going to keep.

As for waiving him. Ehh, it's irrelevant. He absolutely gets claimed by someone.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Grantham

Spectrefire

Registered User
Jan 3, 2013
1,245
1,325
It's pretty obvious they sent him to Seattle as a solid to the player, it's been reported he wanted to go back to Seattle if things didn't work out here.

Honestly, it seems like the team's pretty happy with where Lekkerimaki and Raty are at right now, and with Joshua coming back, they feel they didn't really have a place for Sprong anymore. Better send him somewhere where he'll get an opportunity than riding the bench.
 
  • Like
Reactions: quat and Chiripa20

ChilliBilly

Registered User
Aug 22, 2007
7,298
4,607
chilliwacki
I don't really get why they didn't just waive him.

Would've given him a longer leash for sure. Provides a different element than every other depth player.
They get an asset of some sort for him. He may have chosen the destination. Would really like to know what the future consideration is.

Pretty sure someone would have claimed him.
 

vancityluongo

curse of the strombino
Sponsor
Jul 8, 2006
18,936
6,892
Edmonton
there were too many wingers, but i don't know that sprong is the one i would have moved

unless we're consolidating a bunch of assets into a top of the lineup player, not sure about this one
 

Nuckles

_________
Apr 27, 2010
28,887
5,265
heck
"2. Jonathan Lekkerimaki’s five-goal-in-seven games start at AHL Abbotsford has the Canucks thinking his time is coming sooner than later, which was bad news for Daniel Sprong. His lineup spot was already tenuous, and there was a drop pass in the third period of Thursday’s win over Los Angeles that probably caused Rick Tocchet to eat a full roll of Tums. The interesting thing about his trade to Seattle is that the Canucks could have waived him, and there are only six teams ahead of the Kraken in priority. That tells us: Seattle wanted to make sure it got him, and the Canucks — who accepted nothing in return — made sure he got there. That’s doing someone a favour."
 
  • Like
Reactions: AlainVigneaultsGum

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad