sting101
Registered User
- Feb 8, 2012
- 16,864
- 16,194
Nope most of Canuck fans best posters wanted nothing to do with Lindholm as a 3C for that awful contract about to turn 30 and yes most wanted Zadorov but he's really never been a top4 defensman and was repeatedly benched and had his minutes reduced to 12-14 in his Calgary days for being lazy and unengaged and we saw it at times here too so there is some concern once a guy gets his big legacy deal he wont bring the same intensity.Understood. I still think retaining those two in the long-term would have been a much better route than what the Canucks actually ended up doing.
I bet a fair number of Canuck fans would agree which is why I don’t understand the spazzing above.
Were better off with 4 deals that are short term and Debrusk who fits more to what we need stylistically and still having 3-4 million in cap to maneuver on a top4 D that has impact later than what you propose