Confirmed with Link: VAN/COL Poolman (20% retained) + 2025 4th for Erik Brannstrom(Waived)

VanJack

Registered User
Jul 11, 2014
22,293
15,734
Brannstrom was highly rated in his draft year, and his skating is close to elite.

Problem is, he's listed at 5'10" and 185, and since coming to the league has been absolutely schooled in his own zone. Probably the reason why Ottawa didn't qualify him.

And ultimately the reason why the Av's were only willing to go one year at $900,000. Kind of a baffling signing really. They already have a flock of smaller, offensive d-men led of course by Cale Makar....but Towes, Girard, Kylington and even De Haan are 6'1" or under. Why sign another under-sized defender?

Brannstrom likely spends most of the season in Abbotsford if he clears waivers.....but is still an RFA heading into next season.
 
  • Like
Reactions: David71

Jerry the great

Registered User
Jul 8, 2022
859
869
Brannstrom was highly rated in his draft year, and his skating is close to elite.

Problem is, he's listed at 5'10" and 185, and since coming to the league has been absolutely schooled in his own zone. Probably the reason why Ottawa didn't qualify him.

And ultimately the reason why the Av's were only willing to go one year at $900,000. Kind of a baffling signing really. They already have a flock of smaller, offensive d-men led of course by Cale Makar....but Towes, Girard, Kylington and even De Haan are 6'1" or under. Why sign another under-sized defender?

Brannstrom likely spends most of the season in Abbotsford if he clears waivers.....but is still an RFA heading into next season.
his skating in nowhere near elite. Both top speed and burst bang on league average for defenders. not a great shot either. Couple that with his size and inability to competently defend and you have a player likely on his last NA contract.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PanniniClaus

ziploc

Registered User
Aug 29, 2003
7,402
6,273
Vancouver
That one's been dealt with though. This was the last one that needed to be cleaned up - IIRC, the only other Benning legacy contracts on the team IIRC are Hughes, Demko, and Garland (and Klimovich, lol)
The stink is dissipating.

1728274254737.png
 
Last edited:

The Stig

Rest In Peace Johnny Gaudreau
Feb 14, 2013
15,655
3,853
Maple Ridge B.C.
I keep seeing "he had a really bad camp" but I don't know what that means. Did he accidentally shoot the puck at the coaches mom's head or something?
 

strattonius

Registered User
Jul 4, 2011
4,536
5,074
Surrey, BC
I keep seeing "he had a really bad camp" but I don't know what that means. Did he accidentally shoot the puck at the coaches mom's head or something?

High pedigree player that just has not taken the next step. This was the summer that Brannstrom had to come back and look like he leveled up but he has stagnated.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Stig

lawrence

Registered User
May 19, 2012
16,429
7,337
I don't get this. We wanted to free up cap room but wasn't Poolman on LTIRetired so his cap already didn't count towards our cap? i'm confused.
 

Vector

Moderator
Feb 2, 2007
26,683
44,630
Junktown
I don't get this. We wanted to free up cap room but wasn't Poolman on LTIRetired so his cap already didn't count towards our cap? i'm confused.

That’s not how LTIR works. Essentially, LTIR means you can exceed that cap by that contract amount (2.5m). However there’s another mechanism in place. It’s called daily cap accrual. Every day you gain a little bit more cap space. It grows quite a bit and with say 2.5m in space to start the year, that becomes around 11m by the trade deadline.

If you are on LTIR, you don’t accrue cap space. So you have 2.5m in cap space but it remain static all year. By trading Poolman’s contract (20% retained so Canucks free up 2m) and waiving Brannstrom they are able to get below the salary cap and accrue cap space every day.
 

Hammer79

Registered User
Jan 9, 2009
7,488
1,364
Kelowna
I originally read this as "Canucks get Brunnstrom" and I'm like why are we getting some failed 39 year old forward? Than I realize I am old as f*** and I should get new glasses.
That hatty in his first season was epic though lol.... Nonis' big swing if he had kept his job. Yikes
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bubbles

tantalum

Hope for the best. Expect the worst
Sponsor
Apr 2, 2002
25,421
14,571
Missouri
Canucks can build up cap space with this move and while Brannstrom has had his struggles if they get him the system they might be able to build him into something with strong coaching. He just turned 25 and perhaps you can get him to a third pairing level. Regardless he is some depth in the system if he passes through waivers. So that works.
 

SeawaterOnIce

Bald is back in style.
Sponsor
Aug 28, 2011
17,608
22,080
Vegas received Mark Stone for Erik Brannstrom and a 2nd round pick (Egor Sokolov) Totally horrific trade at the time that looks even worse now.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: quat

Bubbles

Die Hard for Bedard 2023
Apr 16, 2004
8,835
8,377
BC Teams:Nucks,Juve
That hatty in his first season was epic though lol.... Nonis' big swing if he had kept his job. Yikes

I remember the hype on that guy, and he was so close to signing with the Canucks. I had dreams of him lining up with the Sedins for years. That hatty set the league on fire and he literally disappeared right after lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: quat

AlainVigneaultsGum

Holidays in two days
Sponsor
Oct 26, 2012
3,802
6,218
Calgary, AB
Got to hand it to Jimmy Rutherford. When he first hired Allvin as our GM, I know I was underwhelmed at the time, only because I didn't know much about him.

We seem to be blessed with more than competent management right now and it still feels a bit weird in a good way.

Going on three years, too. Which have flown by in comparison to the first three years of the Benning era. Three years into Jimmy's tenure was the Petey draft, but it felt like he'd been around for f***ing ever already hahahaha.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad